Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Male Diversity, Female Disposability

Red Shambhala

Red Shambhala

Death to America
★★
Joined
Nov 10, 2017
Posts
2,575
Online
0
"Diversity" is obviously the big thing these days, with faculty job postings even increasingly demanding "diversity" statements; so as part of your resume and everything you have to include a statement about how diversity macht frei. 

There is, however, a kind of "diversity", people tend not to talk about. (Or actually there are two kinds since liberal identity politics don't care about old-fashioned class and see unemployed white men simply as privileged white men, but that's another thread). 

What I mean is the fact that there's generally more diversity among men than among women. There is generally more variability among men than among women. For better or worse. 

Consider the great artists: all the great artists are men, but the "reading's just for faggots"-types are also mostly men. As far as I know, people with an IQ above average are mostly men, but people with an IQ below average are also mostly men. The funny people, the comedians, the ones who make the whole class laugh, are always men. But the super serious depressed poets, Sinners-in-the-hand-of-an-angry-God-preachers are also men. 

There are men who are into tall women, but there aren't any women into short men. There are men into fat women, but there aren't any women into men with short dicks. There are men who are into dominant women, but there aren't any women into submissive men. According to some study, even TYT debated, the majority of young women these days consider themselves to be "beyond the labels" of homo- and heterosexuality. And yet, the same amount of women would never date a bisexual man. 


Likewise, I've met men (and read about studies as well) who said they'd be fine with a relationship in which the female outearns them or they'd even stay at home and cook. But it's women who are LESS likely to support such a relationship. 

With women, it often feels like if you know one, you know them all. They all have the same social attitude (hypergamous), the same sexual preference (submissive and masochist), the same aesthetic preferences (tall, big dick, etc.) the same interests (travel, coffee, making snapshots in foreign countries and in front of places of worship of religions their parents didn't belong to), the same opinions, the same non-existing humor, etc. 

Male writers always get shit about the way they portrait women. But women should actually be flattered. Because the only really interesting women are the women men have created in media. The women men create actually have more character, more personality than RL women! 

This is one of the reasons why I hate this right-wing, tradcuck, anti-"degeneracy", anti-gay, etc. part of antifeminism. I think among men there should be a trend that we accept that there's relatively much "diversity" among us. Otherwise we just end up fighting each other over stupid identity stuff, while women can go on to be like the borg because they all just want the same anyway.
 
WarmIncelation

WarmIncelation

Officer
★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
597
Online
0
I'm lazy and don't feel like supporting these claims with evidence but I have read that there is scientific data to back up what you're saying. Women fit more in the middle and men are all across the board at both ends of the spectrum. This is most evident when it comes to IQ.
 
Zyros

Zyros

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
3,362
Online
0
The thing on hobbies and shit is not so true. I know many girls who have completely different hobbies/interests

but

There are men who are into tall women, but there aren't any women into short men. There are men into fat women, but there aren't any women into men with short dicks. There are men who are into dominant women, but there aren't any women into submissive men.

This is completely true. In sexual taste, they are all the same.


WarmIncelation said:
I'm lazy and don't feel like supporting these claims with evidence but I have read that there is scientific data to back up what you're saying. Women fit more in the middle and men are all across the board at both ends of the spectrum. This is most evident when it comes to IQ.

This happens too for the looks/treatment-by-life ratio. 

Women quality of life differ but are more in the middle.

Ugly males are treated like scum. Good looking males are treated like gods. There is a much wider disparity on how looks influence life for males than for females, both for the good and the bad.
 

Similar threads

Incel Constantine
Replies
16
Views
577
-TheRinku127-
-TheRinku127-
I
Replies
12
Views
518
Detro
Detro
Edmund_Kemper
Replies
85
Views
5K
the virgin shepherd
the virgin shepherd
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape7
shape8
Top