A girl around 16 is maximally fertile. Men (wait, are they men? No, little boys!) of the same age have neither the mental maturity nor the economic potential to make meaningful use of this fertility for society. Men in their early 30s are at the optimal age, are at the peak of their careers and have more life experience so they can deal with problems better than pubescent wimps and are therefore more suitable as partners for 16-year-old girls. By the time they're 50, the children will be out of the house again. It shouldn't be a crime if a man in his early 30s fucks a girl aged 14 or over. Of course, these are all sexhaver problems and we don't actually need to concern ourselves with this kind of "liberalization" because we don't benefit from it anyway. But purely in terms of logic, the magic 18 is complete nonsense. However, I fear that 14-16 year old jailbaits will prefer chads, even if they are losers, rather than a statusmaxxed incel. So the basic question is: why are we even interested in this whole age-cuck topic?
Last edited:
