JFL Low-tier white normie, noodlewhore couple sentenced to federal prison for producing child pornography of their own children

[PPEcel]

What amazing personalities.



Last week, the U.S. Department of Justice announced that:

A Merriam Village, Missouri, couple was sentenced in federal court for sexually assaulting two young children to produce child pornography, and for receiving and distributing child pornography.

Mark John Millman, 37, a citizen of Great Britain and a legal alien resident, and his wife and co-defendant, Tara Sau Millman, 42, were sentenced in separate hearings before U.S. District Judge Brian C. Wimes. Mark and Tara Millman each were sentenced to 35 years in federal prison without parole. The court also sentenced them to spend the rest of their lives on supervised release following incarceration.

According to an affidavit by a Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agent, the couple was caught after law enforcement noticed Mark Millman (using an account with his actual name) selling child pornography on Mega, a cloud-sharing platform:



After federal agents obtained a search warrant, descended on the Millman home, and seized their devices, both admitted to viewing, producing, receiving, and distributing child pornography.

From Tara Millman's plea agreement:


Mark Millman's plea agreement corroborated his wife's:


Both Millmans pleaded guilty to one count of sexual exploitation of a child, and one count of receipt/distribution of child pornography. Both were sentenced to 35 years' imprisonment; the statutory maximum would have been 50 years.

As the facts repeatedly show, the most depraved human behavior can easily be attributed to sexhaving normies, not incels. This is example #9238712831 of normgroid degeneracy.

 

[Rimiru]

bro is not only low-tier but low iq

 

[Villainous]

Surprised the woman didn’t get off scot-free

 

[starcrapoo]

WMAF couples at it again smh... Remember these two? haha

Woman charged with father’s dismemberment won’t serve prison time

A San Francisco woman won’t serve any prison time for dismembering her elderly dad, whose severed head and other body parts were discovered in a refrigerator, a court ruled. Stephanie Ching, …

nypost.com

 

[PPEcel]

Surprised the woman didn’t get off scot-free

Usually, in criminal cases involving a husband and wife, or any romantic pair, the foid will attempt to argue that she was less culpable because she was abused by the man, that the man was the primary perpetrator, et cetera. You saw that with Elizabeth Holmes and Sunny Balwani.

In this case, I don't know whether Tara Millman made such an argument at sentencing in a bid for leniency, because the sentencing memorandums of the government and the defense are sealed from public view in this particular case. But what we know is that if she did try such a gambit, it didn't work.

 

[PPEcel]

forgot to tag @RoastieBeef @Wizard32

 

[epillepsy]

she's just giving her hapa daughter a head start in the pornography industry.
never too young to start preparing your child for the future.

 

[SparkLight]

Raising an ER if one of the children are male

 

[IchWillSterben]

Mogs moi

 

[Villainous]

Raising an ER if one of the children are male

Not to mention the mental damage that was done from being raped by your own parents as a kid. Hapa + trauma + mental illness = mass killer. These parents just created another incel shooter.

 

[Tjaldur]

35 years is far too long.

Pedophiles in America receive unfair, disproportionate amount of justice to the impact of their harm.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

forgot to tag @RoastieBeef @Wizard32

I'm confused about this part:

The defendant stated in September 2020 or October 2020, the co-defendant used her phone to record her performing oral sex on a two-year-old minor male, Jone Doe.
The defendant stated the co-defendant had also performed oral sex on John Doe on the same occasion.

Am I missing something or is that last sentence describing exactly the same thing as the previous one?
Or are they saying "she performed oral sex on the same boy a 2nd time but didn't record it that second time" ?
Just phrased very strangely.

Anyway I think that in law we should be avoiding terms like "oral sex" entirely.
We have terms like "fellatio" or "irrumatio" to represent those ideas.
Slang like 'oral sex' serves to foster confusion about what sexual intercourse actually is: a penis inside a vagina.

I would also avoid terms like "anal sex", just use "sodomy".
Although sodomy has some application to fellatio/irrumatio as well IMO since those have standalone terms you should just use it to refer to anal penetration with a penis.

Also terms like "pornography" should only apply to actual sexual intercourse (penis in vagina) and not anything else.
IMO some foid giving a guy a blowjob is not pornography because she is only simulating sex with a pseudo-vagina (her mouth)
at best we should call that pseudo-porn

Both Millmans pleaded guilty to one count of sexual exploitation of a child, and one count of receipt/distribution of child pornography. Both were sentenced to 35 years' imprisonment; the statutory maximum would have been 50 years.

That is ridiculously inflated as fuck, you have moms literally murdering their own children and getting only six years

Sask. mother who killed newborn daughter sentenced to 6 years

A judge handed down a six-year sentence for a Kindersley woman who killed her newborn daughter.

saskatoon.ctvnews.ca

The courts are essentially trying to get kids murdered with sentences like these.

35 years is far too long.
Pedophiles in America receive unfair, disproportionate amount of justice to the impact of their harm.

Yeah, no sentence should eclipse actual murder sentences, especially when all she did was lick his dick which probably didn't even traumatize the 2yo boy at all (probably liked it). TBH sentencing for this shit should take into consideration harm, like if she gave him herpes or bit his dick or something like that you should have bigger sentences.

Meanwhile you have rabbi mohel jews actually slicing the skin off of babies penises, raking the bleeding flesh with their fingernails, and THEN putting the penises into their mouths, and it gets celebrated/protected and cops will prosecute their critics as 'hate criminals'.

Literal clown world. BTW those mohels do give the babies herpes, doesn't matter, still protected, still no criminal charges.

 

[uo89997]

 

[Detro]

Poor foid, what happened to her personality detector?

 

[PPEcel]

That is ridiculously inflated as fuck, you have moms literally murdering their own children and getting only six years

Sask. mother who killed newborn daughter sentenced to 6 years

A judge handed down a six-year sentence for a Kindersley woman who killed her newborn daughter.

saskatoon.ctvnews.ca

The courts are essentially trying to get kids murdered with sentences like these.


Yeah, no sentence should eclipse actual murder sentences, especially when all she did was lick his dick which probably didn't even traumatize the 2yo boy at all (probably liked it). TBH sentencing for this shit should take into consideration harm, like if she gave him herpes or bit his dick or something like that you should have bigger sentences.

Meanwhile you have rabbi mohel jews actually slicing the skin off of babies penises, raking the bleeding flesh with their fingernails, and THEN putting the penises into their mouths, and it gets celebrated/protected and cops will prosecute their critics as 'hate criminals'.

Literal clown world. BTW those mohels do give the babies herpes, doesn't matter, still protected, still no criminal charges.

As I've previously pointed out, the United States doesn't have one legal system, it has over fifty of them, because of federalism. This is why you can get such wide sentencing disparities. It's a big country.

 

[Remaincel]

La creatura

 

[SlayerSlayer]

What amazing personalities.

View attachment 592571

Last week, the U.S. Department of Justice announced that:


According to an affidavit by a Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agent, the couple was caught after law enforcement noticed Mark Millman (using an account with his actual name) selling child pornography on Mega, a cloud-sharing platform:

View attachment 592573

After federal agents obtained a search warrant, descended on the Millman home, and seized their devices, both admitted to viewing, producing, receiving, and distributing child pornography.

From Tara Millman's plea agreement:
View attachment 592575

Mark Millman's plea agreement corroborated his wife's:
View attachment 592578

Both Millmans pleaded guilty to one count of sexual exploitation of a child, and one count of receipt/distribution of child pornography. Both were sentenced to 35 years' imprisonment; the statutory maximum would have been 50 years.

As the facts repeatedly show, the most depraved human behavior can easily be attributed to sexhaving normies, not incels. This is example #9238712831 of normgroid degeneracy.

I heard a really good joke from a ricecel who said white guys with asian females always look like a programmer by day, and a serial killer at night

 

[Defetivecuckachu]

Poor foid, what happened to her personality detector?

I think she must have eaten it.

 

[Deleted member 5712]

Don't understand the issue. If it's your kid I think they can damn well do what they please
Who cares if they film the child naked? I could literally go over to their house and they could spread their childs legs wide open and it's totally legal for me to be staring. But take a pic and send it over the internet and now it's illegal? hahahahahahaha

 

[PPEcel]

Don't understand the issue. If it's your kid I think they can damn well do what they please
Who cares if they film the child naked? I could literally go over to their house and they could spread their childs legs wide open and it's totally legal for me to be staring. But take a pic and send it over the internet and now it's illegal? hahahahahahaha

You don't think it's an issue for people to produce child pornography?

 

[Tjaldur]

Yeah, no sentence should eclipse actual murder sentences, especially when all she did was lick his dick which probably didn't even traumatize the 2yo boy at all (probably liked it).

It's annoying when normies constantly reeeee about 'death to pedophiles, they need harsher sentences' and overstate the damage victims goes through. All they can do is restate an idea that's been relayed to them as comfort.

Like being a child porno victim can settle you for life. The victim can become multi-millionaires from
restitution for their "losses" paid by various people
convicted of possessing child pornography they're in.

Supreme Court to decide on restitution for child porn victims

Justices to hear arguments over payment to child rape victim suing man who possessed images of her engaged in sex acts

www.cbsnews.com

By "losses" they just cycle the 'it revictamises me". Kylie Freeman has been abusing this ever since.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

I could literally go over to their house and they could spread their childs legs wide open and it's totally legal for me to be staring

In theory but if you didn't avert your eyes they'd find some shit to pin on you

You don't think it's an issue for people to produce child pornography?

when I was 17 if I took a dick pic that would be producing CP by many legal definitions, you need to be more specific about what you mean, unless you think that's some issue?

 

[Pixycel]

interracial pairings shouldn't be allowed

 

[BlackPilledOverdose]

Further proof that interracial pairings shouldn't be allowed, ER was just the tip of the iceberg

 

[PPEcel]

when I was 17 if I took a dick pic that would be producing CP by many legal definitions, you need to be more specific about what you mean, unless you think that's some issue?

Yes, that is an issue.

@Pumkin also referred to parents taking nude photos of their minor children and selling them on the internet.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

Yes, that is an issue.

@Pumkin also referred to parents taking nude photos of their minor children and selling them on the internet.

still matters if we're talking about some 30yo mom taking photos of her 17yo daughter vs 7yo tbh

 

[PPEcel]

still matters if we're talking about some 30yo mom taking photos of her 17yo daughter vs 7yo tbh

Both are wrong and merit prison time.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

Both are wrong and merit prison time.

yeah but I want separate names for the crimes and separate sentencing guidelines

some guy who has a BJ vid from his 17yo HS girlfriend giving fellatio shouldn't have the same charge to his name as some guy who did irrumatio on his tied-up preteen younger sis, we need different names and clear distinction about the moral differences

 

[fast_curry]

Noodlewhores never fail to deliver when it comes to degeneracy

 

[PPEcel]

yeah but I want separate names for the crimes and separate sentencing guidelines

some guy who has a BJ vid from his 17yo HS girlfriend giving fellatio shouldn't have the same charge to his name as some guy who did irrumatio on his tied-up preteen younger sis, we need different names and clear distinction about the moral differences

We have complex sentencing guidelines that take into account these differences. Needless to say, the guidelines are advisory, not mandatory. There's no need for "separate names" for the crimes.

If someone lends me their credit card to pick up a takeaway and I use it to blow $2000 at Barney's, that's fraud. If I manage a large pension fund, embezzle $500 million, and devastate the finances of thousands of retirees, that's also fraud. They'd both be calculated under the same section of the federal sentencing guidelines. But I'm likely to get probation and a fine for the former and 20 years for the latter.

The problem is that the statutory minimums need to go so that judges, not prosecutors, have more discretion over sentencing.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

If someone lends me their credit card to pick up a takeaway and I use it to blow $2000 at Barney's, that's fraud. If I manage a large pension fund, embezzle $500 million, and devastate the finances of thousands of retirees, that's also fraud. They'd both be calculated under the same section of the federal sentencing guidelines. But I'm likely to get probation and a fine for the former and 20 years for the latter.

The problem is that the statutory minimums need to go so that judges, not prosecutors, have more discretion over sentencing.

yet don't we have stuff like 'petty theft' vs 'grand theft' and various degrees of murder/manslaughter? why semantic distinction there but not elsewhere?

 

[PPEcel]

yet don't we have stuff like 'petty theft' vs 'grand theft' and various degrees of murder/manslaughter? why semantic distinction there but not elsewhere?

Because "murder" and "manslaughter" do have different meanings?

I mean, what kind of terminology to you want to apply to child pornography? Like, 1st degree CP, 2nd degree CP?

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

what kind of terminology to you want to apply to child pornography? Like, 1st degree CP, 2nd degree CP?

sure, we have degrees of rape and sexual assault after all, so why not matching degrees for images which depict those things?

 

[totalcel]

How do you know it’s their own children?

 

[PPEcel]

sure, we have degrees of rape and sexual assault after all, so why not matching degrees for images which depict those things?

So what's the difference between these degrees of CP?

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

So what's the difference between these degrees of CP?

well using Washington law for a basis https://www.findlaw.com/state/washington-law/washington-rape-and-sexual-assault-laws.html

you have 1st/2nd/3rd degree rape

so you could have "1st degree depiction of rape, 2nd degree depiction of rape" etc

though it seems like there might actually be six different classifications for the 'of a child' categories per https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/washington-statutory-rape-laws.htm

in that case there should be 6 degrees of CP depending on which is depicted

though TBH it only makes sense to me to have these charges on people who purchase the media because they are funding the crime itself, like hiring a hitman to murder someone, obviously with some exceptions if it's feds trying to trap the creator in which case they need to make an arrest within a year or get charged with funding rape retroactively - that will motivate them to be successful

 

[PPEcel]

well using Washington law for a basis https://www.findlaw.com/state/washington-law/washington-rape-and-sexual-assault-laws.html

you have 1st/2nd/3rd degree rape

so you could have "1st degree depiction of rape, 2nd degree depiction of rape" etc

though it seems like there might actually be six different classifications for the 'of a child' categories per https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/washington-statutory-rape-laws.htm

in that case there should be 6 degrees of CP depending on which is depicted

though TBH it only makes sense to me to have these charges on people who purchase the media because they are funding the crime itself, like hiring a hitman to murder someone, obviously with some exceptions if it's feds trying to trap the creator in which case they need to make an arrest within a year or get charged with funding rape retroactively - that will motivate them to be successful

I don't agree. Nor do I think individual FBI agents should be criminally liable for an unsuccessful sting.

That aside, would you be interested in a thread discussing the federal sentencing guidelines?

 

[Nihilistic Lowlife]

They should be executed simple as that i wouldn't waste my time in such a case.

 

[Izayacel]

Some People are Just Retarded

These rotten infested poor Shitters shouldnt Bring Kids Into this world.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

I don't agree. Nor do I think individual FBI agents should be criminally liable for an unsuccessful sting.

If the FBI is going to do shit like give money to a bunch of Jews raping babies on camera they sure as hell better apprehend those jews fast, there needs to be accountability for shit like that

IE you can't send undercover FBI guys working for the mafia and help them run drugs for 20 years and never make any arrests

we need some kind of minimum requirement here or you're just letting them be criminals and using taxpayer dollars to fund crime

That aside, would you be interested in a thread discussing the federal sentencing guidelines?

if you wanna ping me I can take a look I guess, what are you comparing them to?

 

[PPEcel]

If the FBI is going to do shit like give money to a bunch of Jews raping babies on camera they sure as hell better apprehend those jews fast, there needs to be accountability for shit like that

IE you can't send undercover FBI guys working for the mafia and help them run drugs for 20 years and never make any arrests

we need some kind of minimum requirement here or you're just letting them be criminals and using taxpayer dollars to fund crime


if you wanna ping me I can take a look I guess, what are you comparing them to?

not really a comparison, just a rundown on how they are used and how to calculate them

 

[übertard]

I have his eye area

 

[Crown of Frowns]

What amazing personalities.

View attachment 592571

Last week, the U.S. Department of Justice announced that:


According to an affidavit by a Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agent, the couple was caught after law enforcement noticed Mark Millman (using an account with his actual name) selling child pornography on Mega, a cloud-sharing platform:

View attachment 592573

After federal agents obtained a search warrant, descended on the Millman home, and seized their devices, both admitted to viewing, producing, receiving, and distributing child pornography.

From Tara Millman's plea agreement:
View attachment 592575

Mark Millman's plea agreement corroborated his wife's:
View attachment 592578

Both Millmans pleaded guilty to one count of sexual exploitation of a child, and one count of receipt/distribution of child pornography. Both were sentenced to 35 years' imprisonment; the statutory maximum would have been 50 years.

As the facts repeatedly show, the most depraved human behavior can easily be attributed to sexhaving normies, not incels. This is example #9238712831 of normgroid degeneracy.

That’s one ugly woman

 

[ThoughtfulCel]

Typical pig and chink

 

[Deleted member 41988]

jfl

 

[iceandblood]

They should be executed simple as that i wouldn't waste my time in such a case.

 

[PPEcel]

I heard a really good joke from a ricecel who said white guys with asian females always look like a programmer by day, and a serial killer at night

 

[Nihilistic Lowlife]

why?

As i said before i just execute them simple as that they are low iq natural selection

 

[Zhou Chang-Xing]

Surprised the woman didn’t get off scot-free

She will, eventually. They all will, or maybe this only applies to White women.

 

[PPEcel]

She will, eventually. They all will, or maybe this only applies to White women.

Stacies don't need to take plea deals because they can sob and the simps on the jury will buy her act