Serious Low iqcels could be more harmful than foids for society

[Pepsicel]

Foids bring to the table their vaginas. That release the willing force hidden in men. This willing force led to many inventions and civilizations seen for thousands of years and thousand realms. Pussy is what ironically separates us from the rest of animals. This willing force is that led many incels to study engineerings with the hope of work as a betabuxxer or buy copes to deal with their inceldom.
But What do low iqcels bring to the table? Nothing. Their jobs can be replaced by robots, AI or foids. They won't do a better job than foids because there's a lot of data that suggest that foids' iq is more homogenous than men's iq. In other words: Men have the smartest and dumbest people while women are on average less smarter and less dumber.
A wrong generalization in the Manosphere is that foids are dumber than men. This might be true if you are high iq man but this doesn't apply for low iq men that are easier to see than low iq women.
Now that you read my comment...
Which is the point to settle down foids with their lookmatches if the last ones are Low iqcels? Shouldn't this foids be more productive chasing Chad as potential betabuxxers than the previous scenario?

 

[DeepSea]

Men have the smartest and dumbest people while women are on average less smarter and less dumber. A wrong generalization in the Manosphere is that foids are dumber than men. This might be true if you are high iq man but this doesn't apply for low iq men that are easier to see than low iq women

You are completely wrong. Many people believe that the male IQ bell curve is "flatter" with more at the extreme low and extreme high while women have more at the center, but the idea is that both genders end up with similar IQ or that women are slightly smarter on average. That is actually false and the reason why is that the scientists who argued this had an agenda and manipulated the subjects used for the study.

Every "study" that comes to this conclusion only tests children between the ages of 10-14 or so. This is critical because of a thing called puberty, where girls start it before boys, and it usually happens within this age range. During puberty, one thing that happens obviously is that your brain grows, and so girls' brains grow while boys' are still developing. This means girls get a once-in-a-lifetime advantage over boys, and it's very telling that even with this handicap, boys still test equally overall.

When other IQ tests were done where both men and women finished puberty (e.g. adults over 18), men are just flat out smarter:

Higher average, higher upper limit, and higher lower limit. And it only makes sense intuitively. Men literally have ~10% larger brains than women on average. It only makes sense that men are going to be smarter than women, because brains are not just for show.

Even though IQ tests were specifically designed to maximise female results by scientists sympathetic to foid emancipation, males consistently outperform females by around 5 IQ points on average.

"Results showed that there is no difference among children aged 6–14 years, but that males obtain higher means from the age of 15 through to old age. Among adults, the male advantage is 0.33d equivalent to 5 IQ points." (source)

"The orthodoxy in intelligence research for the second half of the 20th century had been that men and women had the same average intelligence, but men had greater variance in their distribution than women. Most geniuses were men, and most imbeciles were men, they said, while most women were in the normal range. This conclusion, however, was manufactured out of political expediency. Not wanting to discover, or a priori denying, any sex differences in intelligence, psychometricians simply deleted from the standardized IQ tests any item on which the performance of men and women differed.

Studies with large representative national samples from Spain, Denmark, and the United States, as well as meta-analyses of a large number of published studies throughout the world, all conclude that men on average are slightly but significantly more intelligent than women, by about 3-5 IQ points. So this has now become the new (albeit tentative) consensus in intelligence research."

Why Men Are More Intelligent Than Women

Or are they?

www.psychologytoday.com

 

[Deleted member 35171]

Their jobs can be replaced by robots, AI or foids.

Who builds the robots?

Social service jobs (fast food, cleaning services, etc) shouldn't exist in the first place.
Give everyone industry jobs but lower the working hours so people can go home and cook, clean, etc for themselves. Besides more time at home = more time to breed (your state mandated wife.)

 

[wei#3959]

You are completely wrong. Many people believe that the male IQ bell curve is "flatter" with more at the extreme low and extreme high while women have more at the center, but the idea is that both genders end up with similar IQ or that women are slightly smarter on average. That is actually false and the reason why is that the scientists who argued this had an agenda and manipulated the subjects used for the study.

Every "study" that comes to this conclusion only tests children between the ages of 10-14 or so. This is critical because of a thing called puberty, where girls start it before boys, and it usually happens within this age range. During puberty, one thing that happens obviously is that your brain grows, and so girls' brains grow while boys' are still developing. This means girls get a once-in-a-lifetime advantage over boys, and it's very telling that even with this handicap, boys still test equally overall.

When other IQ tests were done where both men and women finished puberty (e.g. adults over 18), men are just flat out smarter:

View attachment 547337


Higher average, higher upper limit, and higher lower limit. And it only makes sense intuitively. Men literally have ~10% larger brains than women on average. It only makes sense that men are going to be smarter than women, because brains are not just for show.

Even though IQ tests were specifically designed to maximise female results by scientists sympathetic to foid emancipation, males consistently outperform females by around 5 IQ points on average.

"Results showed that there is no difference among children aged 6–14 years, but that males obtain higher means from the age of 15 through to old age. Among adults, the male advantage is 0.33d equivalent to 5 IQ points." (source)

"The orthodoxy in intelligence research for the second half of the 20th century had been that men and women had the same average intelligence, but men had greater variance in their distribution than women. Most geniuses were men, and most imbeciles were men, they said, while most women were in the normal range. This conclusion, however, was manufactured out of political expediency. Not wanting to discover, or a priori denying, any sex differences in intelligence, psychometricians simply deleted from the standardized IQ tests any item on which the performance of men and women differed.

Studies with large representative national samples from Spain, Denmark, and the United States, as well as meta-analyses of a large number of published studies throughout the world, all conclude that men on average are slightly but significantly more intelligent than women, by about 3-5 IQ points. So this has now become the new (albeit tentative) consensus in intelligence research."

Why Men Are More Intelligent Than Women

Or are they?

www.psychologytoday.com

based

 

[Rhaast]

Btw op is low IQ

 

[Deleted member 38579]

Which is the point to settle down foids with their lookmatches if the last ones are Low iqcels?

Wrong. Ugly men are the ones behind inventions, and there's recent cases of this.

Foids are responsible of the decay of so(y)ciety and are advocating to reduce the quality of life of men, thus stagnating technology and so(y)ciety progress.

Men are more productive than foids, regardless of IQ. Foids tend to be counter-productive as I said above.

Btw op is low IQ

that's the least of OP's problems considering his thread is foid worshipping and soycuckery advocacy.

 

[Pepsicel]

Wrong. Ugly men are the ones behind inventions, and there's recent cases of this.

Foids are responsible of the decay of so(y)ciety and are advocating to reduce the quality of life of men, thus stagnating technology and so(y)ciety progress.

Men are more productive than foids, regardless of IQ. Foids tend to be counter-productive as I said above.


that's the least of OP's problems considering his thread is foid worshipping and soycuckery advocacy.

I never said that ugly men weren't behind most inventions. I was pointing out that LowIQcels might be less productive than foids nowadays . Ignoring the data of @DeepSea because I didn't know it, my first claims aren't mutually exclusive.

 

[Deleted member 38579]

I was pointing out that LowIQcels might be less productive than foids nowadays .

Still wrong. even a fucking NEET is more productive than a foid and her meme degree

 

[Pepsicel]

Still wrong. even a fucking NEET is more productive than a foid and her meme degree

Depends of the NEET and the foid. If the foid works for the private sector in a company that doesn't receive bucks from the Goverment and the NEET receives a NEETbuxx plan from Goverment the foid is more productive.

 

[Linesnap99]

the roads were build by the people you call low iq.

 

[Deleted member 35171]

the roads were build by the people you call low iq.

Exactly.

 

[NYCcel]

OP thinks he's

Well done @DeepSea for clearing this up and linking to an interesting website (emilkirkegaard.dk)

 

[Pepsicel]

OP thinks he's

No. I'm low iq myself. Even foids had to teach me. I feel out of place. I have no real value for society.

Btw op is low IQ

It's me.

 

[Defetivecuckachu]

What was the question?

I think I'm a bit too low-IQ for all this....

 

[Transcended Trucel]

Btw op is low IQ

What was the question?

I think I'm a bit too low-IQ for all this....

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

Justus Grossbier is an amateur musician.

When considered jointly with the available literature, the findings suggest that children with higher IQs are more likely than their lower-IQ counterparts to take music lessons, and to perform well on a variety of tests of cognitive ability except for those measuring executive function.

His PIQ is impaired, though:

Racial inequality is simply a fact of our existence. Observe the case of Justus Grossbier:

View attachment 549307

Notice the subtle redirection. This teacher is clearly aware of racial differences in fluid intelligence.

View attachment 549309

Angela's Bio:

View attachment 549310

View attachment 549311

View attachment 549319

View attachment 549320

Remember:

the roads were build by the people you call low iq.

It is the contrast between a construction worker and an architect.