Soy “Looksmatch is a false concept. Your “looksmatch” is who you can get”

[BITG]

This is obviously BS, but what do you guys think of this?

 

[Personalityinkwell]

my looksmatch doesn't exist

 

[Cheesecel]

1+1=3

 

[Tenshi]

 

[Robtical]

Of course hypergamous whores who go for way above their looksmatches will deny that there's such a thing as lookmatch.

 

[Speedloader]

I hate when looksmatch is confused with smvmatch

 

[BITG]

Of course hypergamous whores who go for way above their looksmatches will deny that there's such a thing as lookmatch.

I hate when looksmatch is confused with smvmatch

1+1=3

 

[ThouShallObeyKing]

This is obviously BS, but what do you guys think of this?

its kind of ironic cause by this logic many men have no looksmatch at all (no girl will date them)

 

[Deleted member 19546]

Down syndrome looksmatch is someone else with down syndrome.

But many guys with down syndrome cannot get down syndrome girls.

 

[WØLF]

Of course hypergamous whores who go for way above their looksmatches will deny that there's such a thing as lookmatch.

 

[BITG]

its kind of ironic cause by this logic many men have no looksmatch at all (no girl will date them)

They would argue that isn’t true. They would improve confidence and social status, like its simple to do that whilst starting from the bottom with little self esteem because of years of isolation and bullying.

Down syndrome looksmatch is someone else with down syndrome.

But many guys with down syndrome cannot get down syndrome girls.

 

[randomguy1235]

Of course hypergamous whores who go for way above their looksmatches will deny that there's such a thing as lookmatch.

 

[IncelKing]

There is a difference between SMV (Sexual Market Value) and LOOKSMATCH

LOOKS-MATCH is based on OBJECTIVE LOOKS. WHO YOU CAN GET is based on SMV, NOT LOOKS

A 5/10 male's looksmatch is a 5/10 female. However a 5/10 male will only be able to get a 3/10 female, hence a 5/10 male and 3/10 female have the same SMV.

 

[Sheogorath]

This is obviously BS, but what do you guys think of this?

I think that obviously there is no exact match, and the 'ranking' system of attractiveness obviously involves some subjectivity/flexibility (it can vary person to person) but we could generally in theory average out people's ranking on an individual level to get an average level an determine an approximate match.

"Match" obviously sounds too specific. Maybe within 1 point either way should qualify as a match.

So a male who is mid-tier ~50 percentile would 'match' with foids 40-60 percentile, for example

 

[Deleted member 26140]

Our looksmatches are getting pounded by chad as we speak

 

[TheNEET]

But many guys with down syndrome cannot get down syndrome girls.

down syndrome pussy is for chad only

 

[mNFwTJ3wz9]

looksmatch is confused with smvmatch

 

[Over_this_Life]

There is a difference between SMV (Sexual Market Value) and LOOKSMATCH

LOOKS-MATCH is based on OBJECTIVE LOOKS. WHO YOU CAN GET is based on SMV, NOT LOOKS

A 5/10 male's looksmatch is a 5/10 female. However a 5/10 male will only be able to get a 3/10 female, hence a 5/10 male and 3/10 female have the same SMV.

 

[Sparrow's Song]

So if you're an ugly male in 2020, your looksmatch is a literal granny or a gay dude...

 

[autism kills]

There is a difference between SMV (Sexual Market Value) and LOOKSMATCH

LOOKS-MATCH is based on OBJECTIVE LOOKS. WHO YOU CAN GET is based on SMV, NOT LOOKS

A 5/10 male's looksmatch is a 5/10 female. However a 5/10 male will only be able to get a 3/10 female, hence a 5/10 male and 3/10 female have the same SMV.

 

[IncelKing]

This has to be fake. I just cant process this.

So if you're an ugly male in 2020, your looksmatch is a literal granny or a gay dude...

Society expects unattractive STRAIGHT men to circumvent their SEXUALITY by fucking TRANNIES and FAGGOTS in order to overcome their sexual deprivation.

Holy shit it's so fucking OVER

 

[BITG]

There is a difference between SMV (Sexual Market Value) and LOOKSMATCH

LOOKS-MATCH is based on OBJECTIVE LOOKS. WHO YOU CAN GET is based on SMV, NOT LOOKS

A 5/10 male's looksmatch is a 5/10 female. However a 5/10 male will only be able to get a 3/10 female, hence a 5/10 male and 3/10 female have the same SMV.

Agreed. But you believe that looks are objective? Isn’t it subjective to a degree?

 

[Deleted member 22999]

I think looksmatch is your opposite gender equivalent out of 10 on the looksmeter

 

[IncelKing]

Agreed. But you believe that looks are objective? Isn’t it subjective to a degree?

of course looks are objective. There are universal standards for what is considered attractive.

Height: 94% of women would reject a man for being too short. https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Bl...of_women_reject_men_for_being_.22too_short.22

Face: tinder experiments show that an ugly incel will struggle to find matches NO MATTER WHERE you set the location to. Meanwhile Chad slays EVERYWHERE

 

[BITG]

of course looks are objective. There are universal standards for what is considered attractive.

Height: 94% of women would reject a man for being too short. https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Bl...of_women_reject_men_for_being_.22too_short.22

Face: tinder experiments show that an ugly incel will struggle to find matches NO MATTER WHERE you set the location to. Meanwhile Chad slays EVERYWHERE

True. But are there specific height requirements and face ratios/prominence of the bones one must have? What are the exact cut off lines?

 

[Damo the incel]

That's what foids want you to believe, them ugly bitches that can't even take there make up, 3/10 foids bumping up to 5s with makeup and still dating a guy above there make up looks match probably getting a 6/10 guy

 

[IncelKing]

True. But are there specific height requirements and face ratios/prominence of the bones one must have? What are the exact cut off lines?

You'll find all your answers here.

Scientific Blackpill

The Scientific Blackpill is about understanding the nature of human social and sexual behavior with a particular focus on evolutionary psychological perspectives...

incels.wiki

 

[Quarantined]

I hate when looksmatch is confused with smvmatch

Ya but unfortunetly the main forces acting on the sexual market place are supply and demand. Men have higher then foids due to higher sex drive.

 

[BITG]

You'll find all your answers here.

Scientific Blackpill

The Scientific Blackpill is about understanding the nature of human social and sexual behavior with a particular focus on evolutionary psychological perspectives...

incels.wiki

Brutal incel wiki pill

 

[bignose]

5/10 male and 3/10 female have the same SMV.

i dont agree , smv of a 3/10 female is much greater than all the sub8 males

 

[Opus132]

A woman's looksmatch is who she can keep.

 

[Justice Bao]

There is a difference between SMV (Sexual Market Value) and LOOKSMATCH

LOOKS-MATCH is based on OBJECTIVE LOOKS. WHO YOU CAN GET is based on SMV, NOT LOOKS

A 5/10 male's looksmatch is a 5/10 female. However a 5/10 male will only be able to get a 3/10 female, hence a 5/10 male and 3/10 female have the same SMV.

Absolutely true. But explaining that to a simp is harder than teaching a chimpanzee rocket science

 

[Neggr]

my looksmatch doesn't exist

 

[squirrelsonfire2]

What bullshit if the only thing a 7’0 tall gigachad can get is a 4’0 obese retard doesn’t make him her looksmatch

 

[BITG]

What bullshit if the only thing a 7’0 tall gigachad can get is a 4’0 obese retard doesn’t make him her looksmatch

Agreed. Even though it’s an exaggeration, it doesn’t make sense by definition.