This was written more or less so for a femoid audience, so I need someone to get this on cuckqueers ASAP due to the fact I have no reddit account.
Since the disturbance of the great cuck https://incels.is/members/chadthepussymagnet.5747/ (May Khuda burn them in hell forever with no chance for repentance) , I've been forced to create this quick looks-personality parallel for femoids, so they can understand what we are saying and to put and end to women saying {{{PERSONAITY MATTER!!!}}}.
In this essay, I will not include height or status or race for the case of simplicity.
But first, we need to accept these axioms:
Axiom A: Personality can be changed. (You tell us to do this all the fucking time) (this axiom is not actually true IRL (see mental health concerns), but we're making is so due to fact that you say it so).
Axiom B: Looks (Genetics-wise) cannot be changed. (Not all of us are Biomedical Engineers)
Axiom C: Looks distribution within the male population is so:
As many of the femoids who are opposed to Incelistani Ideology have ///Tinder\\\, I shall use it as a case study.
Suppose you are on ///Tinder\\\ looking for a quick hookup. You see the profiles, and all profiles on that app only tell you two things. Their Looks (Upper Image) and their personality (Bio). You probably feel the need to achieve something with whom you get, after all, You want the your person to be 'the perfect match' or 'mr. perfect'/'the best one' for you. As Axiom A states, personality can be changed, but as Axiom B states, looks cannot be changed. Your first priority, whether it's hookup or LTR, would be looks. Why?
For Hookups:
You're only going to spend a small time with him, so something he can change is his own matter. However, his appearance is a different story. To get the best, use the unchangeable.
For LTR (In 20's when you're still prime):
A guy with good looks has the best of the unchangeable, but his personality can be changed. If it's already good, you just won the chicken dinner, and if not, you're bound to him by the fact there's aren't that many people who look as good as he does, so with no other good choice, you're bound to him. Why? Axiom C, there aren't many guys that look good, combined with the fact that you only have 80 years of life, you may as well stick it out and attempt to change the changeable (personality). If you happen to become a mother (please don't you fucking whore), endowing your kids with ideal genetics is the best thing you can do as a parent, as your kid can change their personality upon wish.
I had to dumb it down for femoids (I used the least amount of Statistics/Science/Objective Logic possible and had to write this like it was for a fucking 5 year old) , so I expect this on the front page of IT by the next morning.
Since the disturbance of the great cuck https://incels.is/members/chadthepussymagnet.5747/ (May Khuda burn them in hell forever with no chance for repentance) , I've been forced to create this quick looks-personality parallel for femoids, so they can understand what we are saying and to put and end to women saying {{{PERSONAITY MATTER!!!}}}.
In this essay, I will not include height or status or race for the case of simplicity.
But first, we need to accept these axioms:
Axiom A: Personality can be changed. (You tell us to do this all the fucking time) (this axiom is not actually true IRL (see mental health concerns), but we're making is so due to fact that you say it so).
Axiom B: Looks (Genetics-wise) cannot be changed. (Not all of us are Biomedical Engineers)
Axiom C: Looks distribution within the male population is so:
As many of the femoids who are opposed to Incelistani Ideology have ///Tinder\\\, I shall use it as a case study.
Suppose you are on ///Tinder\\\ looking for a quick hookup. You see the profiles, and all profiles on that app only tell you two things. Their Looks (Upper Image) and their personality (Bio). You probably feel the need to achieve something with whom you get, after all, You want the your person to be 'the perfect match' or 'mr. perfect'/'the best one' for you. As Axiom A states, personality can be changed, but as Axiom B states, looks cannot be changed. Your first priority, whether it's hookup or LTR, would be looks. Why?
For Hookups:
You're only going to spend a small time with him, so something he can change is his own matter. However, his appearance is a different story. To get the best, use the unchangeable.
For LTR (In 20's when you're still prime):
A guy with good looks has the best of the unchangeable, but his personality can be changed. If it's already good, you just won the chicken dinner, and if not, you're bound to him by the fact there's aren't that many people who look as good as he does, so with no other good choice, you're bound to him. Why? Axiom C, there aren't many guys that look good, combined with the fact that you only have 80 years of life, you may as well stick it out and attempt to change the changeable (personality). If you happen to become a mother (please don't you fucking whore), endowing your kids with ideal genetics is the best thing you can do as a parent, as your kid can change their personality upon wish.
I had to dumb it down for femoids (I used the least amount of Statistics/Science/Objective Logic possible and had to write this like it was for a fucking 5 year old) , so I expect this on the front page of IT by the next morning.
Last edited:
