It sounds like you’re either saying personality matters in some capacity, or that one must be at the zenith of man’s potential in order to retain a woman’s loyalty
Swag is a low inhib high NT personality. I do believe that matters. But the unifying aspect that all desired traits women want in a suitor umbrella-under from is power/ dominance/ vanity pleasure.
Having a high NT, low inhib personality is just being the entertainment that has good applicacy for genetics (being the model uniform individual who has distinctive traits that put him above others in competitive/ resource taking circumstances), and power to use it.
Ultimately this is the only true function women look for by which all else stems from. At least, the only one which is sheerly severe enough that, primally, distinction among other males is discerned for.
If you have sentiment among a girl, she can care about other things.
But the blackpill behind that though is that it still requires distinction.
But even if you have a good personality, and immaterial traits, I think the ULTIMATE aspect that all traits umbrella is distinction. Dominance, power is just the most competitive/ crude/ cruel subcolumn of human attractiveness.
And being a good violin player/ nice guy/ tender/ beta-grace also in a sense weaves in and is enhanced with being dominant... in maybe not a competitive way, but in some kind of way against some harsh opposing forces in her life like psychological forces such as loneliness/ finances/ her family.
Incel + swag = creepy
Chad + swag(0) = cute sexy dork
It's all about looks. Money and status work if you also have looks or you don't mind being betabux.
Women characterize all traits that are not the ones that are the centerpiece of their desire (IF THE CENTERPIECE TRAITS DON'T HAVE QUALITY THAT MEETS THEIR CRITERIA OF DESIRABILITY) as to be reasons for aggressiveness, creepiness, ill-will from the person who has them. Even if they mean well. It's all just a reasoning-veneering to keeping the substantio-set (substance set) that is the beta/ incel's identiy away from them.
They characterize all other traits based on the quality of the centerpieces. (centerpiece susbtance vs side-specifications/ sidespecs).
And typically those are the unchangeable traits. Because women are competitively considerate/ novelty desiring.
If women want distinction in society then they will want someone who has high value traits in unchangeable places to be comparatively superior to those around them. That's what all this is about. The more we suffer, and are disrespected as a species then the more we want to have payback by being comparatively superior to make others feel pain by anxiety. Superficiality is just social revenge.
Women are premeditative and analyze value by all possible combinations that can be taken.
But the lack of changeability all people have is what gives the alphas/ chads their distinction of dominance.
Without value like race, face, height, etc. that's unchangeable then they wouldn't be so impressively distinct, with such ominous novelty.
Because men who have bad traits can't change them/ bad unchangeable traits, then the woman has no chance of value with that person, so they just look for excuses to eliminate him from the equation.
