Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Looks Matter should be changed to "Genetics Matter"

  • Thread starter Deleted member 4159
  • Start date
Deleted member 4159

Deleted member 4159

An outcast among outcasts
-
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Posts
11,775
Normies criticize looks theory as being shallow and one dimensional. And to a degree, they're right. However, not only do they underestimate the importance of looks, they underestimate the near permanent impact of genetics on everything in your life. From athletic ability, talent, intelligence, behaviors, even their precious "muh personality". The overall genetics argument is far more encompassing, and much harder to refute than looks alone.
 
Good point! Genetics also determines a lot more than your SMV, so parallels can be drawn. However, looks matter a lot more than normies are willing to acknowledge, but that's a finer point that isn't quite as important to drive home as the general fact that the sexual market is "unfair".
 
Good point! Genetics also determines a lot more than your SMV, so parallels can be drawn. However, looks matter a lot more than normies are willing to acknowledge, but that's a finer point that isn't quite as important to drive home as the general fact that the sexual market is "unfair".
Exactly, looks is one of many essential genetic factors
 
It’s true i think even when you surgery max there is an element of uncertainty to how far you can really max out even w plastic surgery ESPECIALLY for manlets who are always gonna be short af
 
It’s true i think even when you surgery max there is an element of uncertainty to how far you can really max out even w plastic surgery ESPECIALLY for manlets who are always gonna be short af
Also applies if you have a small skull, small hands, small frame, etc.
 
I disagree. Looks don't correlate that much strongly with good genetics or other abilities, and if you managed to looksmaxx in a way that you look like Chad you'd actually get just as much success as Chad.

Looks > genetics when it comes to get women.

A 9/10 Chad with serious congenital diseases mogs every single healthy cel here.
 
From athletic ability, talent, intelligence, behaviors, even their precious "muh personality". The overall genetics argument is far more encompassing, and much harder to refute than looks alone.
The problem is that normies also don't believe that intelligence is genetic (just read some books bro), and talent for them is just a matter of practice and persistence.
The genetic argument would destroy the myth of meritocracy.
 
I disagree. Looks don't correlate that much strongly with good genetics or other abilities, and if you managed to looksmaxx in a way that you look like Chad you'd actually get just as much success as Chad.

Looks > genetics when it comes to get women.

A 9/10 Chad with serious congenital diseases mogs every single healthy cel here.
The halo effect makes people percieve attractive people as more intelligent than they actually are. However, good genetics have a tendency to come in packages. For example, many studies have shown that attractive people tend to have higher iq's. Their skull size tends to be better, which houses a bigger brain. So the halo effect, combined with actually having better genetics overall, is a double edged sword.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top