IncelKing
Chaos is a laddER
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2019
- Posts
- 9,553
At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter whether you’re: male or female, tall or short, good-looking or ugly, ethnic or white etc.
when you buy a burger at KFC, that burger will cost $10 for an Indian in the same way it will cost $10 for a white person, it will cost $10 for a short person in the same way it will cost $10 for a tall person, it will cost $10 for a man and it will also cost $10 for a woman. The price of the burger will be the same for everyone irregardless of what you look like.
when you buy a house which has a value of 1.1 million dollars, that house will cost the same to everyone no matter what you look like. When you buy a car which costs $50k, that car will cost the same to everyone no matter what you look like. Etc.
money is the ultimate equaliser because it doesn’t take into consideration a person’s looks, goods/services in society will always have the same cost/monetary value to everyone irregardless of their appearance.
What I love about money is
allows you to bypass the limitations of your appearance by enabling you to get what you want based on how much money you have rather than what you look like.
Chad can get Stacy for free because of his looks, but as an incel if you have money, you can provide compensation for your looks through the money you’re giving the Stacy, and therefore be able to bang the same Stacy as chad, when realistically if it wasn’t for money the incel having sex with Stacy is highly unlikely (nearly impossible lol). In the same way chad fucks her pussy, if you offer to pay her a price that she cannot refuse, you will be fucking her pussy just like chad.
Money allows you to overcome biology and genetic shortcomings so that you can gain access to sex/reproduction just like males of high genetic quality. Without money, this wouldn’t be possible! There is nothing more powerful than money in this society.
I believe the criteria for whether a man is incel or not, should not be limited to his looks because if a man has money, then doesn’t matter how ugly he is, he can have a sex life just like chad.
I believe the criteria for inceldom should take into consideration a man’s net worth and financial position (rather than only taking into consideration “looks” as a factor), because a rich ugly guy who is able to use his money to purchase access to top-tier women on a regular basis doesn’t logically belong in the same category as a poor ugly guy who doesn’t have the money to purchase sex at all (or at least not on a regular basis).
You can’t categorise them in the same category just because they have same looks, when their life experiences are completely different due to changing the variable of “money”.
to be an incel, you have to be BOTH ugly AND broke.
If you’re broke but good-looking, ugly but rich, or in the best case scenario you are good-looking AND rich at the same time:
you can’t be An incel.
That’s why those who have the money to be able to afford escorts can’t be incel, to explain this in a simpler way, let’s look at the criteria to be an incel. To be an INCEL, you have to be:
INVOLUNTARILY (due to factors out of your control)
CELIBATE (sexless)
Escort”cels” are having sex so they can’t be celibate (sexless), let alone involuntarily celibate.
if you are having sex, doesn’t matter whether you’re getting it through looks or money, you’re still getting sex and therefore cannot be classified as a celibate let alone involuntary celibate (incel).
Escortcels are not incel and don’t belong here, true incels are both ugly and broke, so not only are they unable to use looks to attract regular women, they can’t even use money to pay escorts.
when you buy a burger at KFC, that burger will cost $10 for an Indian in the same way it will cost $10 for a white person, it will cost $10 for a short person in the same way it will cost $10 for a tall person, it will cost $10 for a man and it will also cost $10 for a woman. The price of the burger will be the same for everyone irregardless of what you look like.
when you buy a house which has a value of 1.1 million dollars, that house will cost the same to everyone no matter what you look like. When you buy a car which costs $50k, that car will cost the same to everyone no matter what you look like. Etc.
money is the ultimate equaliser because it doesn’t take into consideration a person’s looks, goods/services in society will always have the same cost/monetary value to everyone irregardless of their appearance.
What I love about money is
allows you to bypass the limitations of your appearance by enabling you to get what you want based on how much money you have rather than what you look like.
Chad can get Stacy for free because of his looks, but as an incel if you have money, you can provide compensation for your looks through the money you’re giving the Stacy, and therefore be able to bang the same Stacy as chad, when realistically if it wasn’t for money the incel having sex with Stacy is highly unlikely (nearly impossible lol). In the same way chad fucks her pussy, if you offer to pay her a price that she cannot refuse, you will be fucking her pussy just like chad.
Money allows you to overcome biology and genetic shortcomings so that you can gain access to sex/reproduction just like males of high genetic quality. Without money, this wouldn’t be possible! There is nothing more powerful than money in this society.
I believe the criteria for whether a man is incel or not, should not be limited to his looks because if a man has money, then doesn’t matter how ugly he is, he can have a sex life just like chad.
I believe the criteria for inceldom should take into consideration a man’s net worth and financial position (rather than only taking into consideration “looks” as a factor), because a rich ugly guy who is able to use his money to purchase access to top-tier women on a regular basis doesn’t logically belong in the same category as a poor ugly guy who doesn’t have the money to purchase sex at all (or at least not on a regular basis).
You can’t categorise them in the same category just because they have same looks, when their life experiences are completely different due to changing the variable of “money”.
to be an incel, you have to be BOTH ugly AND broke.
If you’re broke but good-looking, ugly but rich, or in the best case scenario you are good-looking AND rich at the same time:
you can’t be An incel.
That’s why those who have the money to be able to afford escorts can’t be incel, to explain this in a simpler way, let’s look at the criteria to be an incel. To be an INCEL, you have to be:
INVOLUNTARILY (due to factors out of your control)
CELIBATE (sexless)
Escort”cels” are having sex so they can’t be celibate (sexless), let alone involuntarily celibate.
if you are having sex, doesn’t matter whether you’re getting it through looks or money, you’re still getting sex and therefore cannot be classified as a celibate let alone involuntary celibate (incel).
Escortcels are not incel and don’t belong here, true incels are both ugly and broke, so not only are they unable to use looks to attract regular women, they can’t even use money to pay escorts.
Last edited: