Why do I say peerless? Because you need to be distinct. Attraction is relational. You need to be atop her criteria. Not just in your raw perceived value as an individual, materialistically or immaterially. It's also in your attainability/ your accessibility/ your bondability/ your vibe/ etc. And that's all based on female perception.
Low self esteem girls may be super bitchy and try to create vibes that have the ethereal feel of superiority, but it's transparent. Low self esteem girls may care less about looks because they know that they can never satisfy someone else on the basis of looks alone, so they dare not go into the looks department because they'd know that those who are good looking would innately have more superficial/ dominarchical desires. So she'll stay with a loser because they'll be more kind to her. Because they can't criticize her in anyway where they themselves can't take the heat. (She knows that it's people's primal predilection to join in on any clique (that is high in the primality scales) that they are able to reside in so long as the pressure of criticism they'll inflict on him will be less than what can be said about them. And where someone on the hierarchies of mankind is prominent. On and around the same level those people are on the primal scales. Where they can be criticized/ admired on the same level they are. But if they can be criticized more/ admired less, receive more negativity and little positivity than those people then they will flock away eventually in their own self-serving streams of being. And you won't be able to resonate with them.
People stay away from those who are better than them. By primal predilection of those who will receive certain stimulus that on their primality/ dominarchicality capital that they will not be able to reside with. The overall status of how you are on all this. Well, the existentiarchy. For the environment. So Enviro-aptness. If you are an existing being there is usually a method by which organics reside in it. You need to master the basis of it. Being suitable for the material universe, and humanity's immaterial judgment system. All of these existentio-pressures will make people insecure if they are unfit for it. And when others are better suited, they will be critical of other people, and are willing to swerve the weak. People dont' want that kind of hit on their self esteem. human primality/ dominarchicality/ tyrannarchy. These are a part of human judgment when you prevail in the Biological Based Existentiarchy.
Where you are better suited/ evolutionarily equipped/ stronger/ faster/ more abilitated. People want to qualify for elite environments. Where you have high power in the Existentiarchy. And people's primarchical perception will see it. You have a perch by which you can use your tyrannicality and dominarchical position to cow/ criticize the weak, and they can't fight back.
Being a part of having a peerless package means you have no equal. For a girl's criteria of inclusion, the higher she is on the existentiarchy, then the more she will want to have others to have this same hierarchical capital. People and their inner primality want something for their suitor.
Raw Value based attraction. Where someone not conducive to your personal comfort, but has everything on your laundry list is who you'll pursue. Chad comes in here. 80-90% of relationships come in contact here.
Personal Position based attraction. Where you're looking for someone suited to your position. Where the things they have are not on your personal desire list, your primal desire, but because they meet your suitability scale/ suitorarchy, then they will be chosen. Beta providers come in here. I'd say about 80-90% of marriages come through here.
big difference between marriage and relationship.
The paragonic package for pairing, whether primality based or just on one's personal current position.
The problem isn't just that it's all about looks though. It's the panspanning standard across all scales of substance that forges the package they desire. And women have high affluence in the modern 1st world. They will not just settle for looks alone.
And all of these things are picked with the panspanning standard across all these scales with the need for htem to be suitable excellent. Incels/ mentalcels/ etc-cels can't hold a candle to maybe even any of these standards they have on any scale of substance.
It's not looks, it's the entire primality preference package. It ranges from raw aesthetic substance, to vibe, to finance, to power, etc. Typically amounting to you being the ethereal eminent enigma that shines down upon her emotional receptors as the being of her dreams/ the prospects bringing her ideal identity. Utterly pan-suitable for her preference.
Low self esteem girls may be super bitchy and try to create vibes that have the ethereal feel of superiority, but it's transparent. Low self esteem girls may care less about looks because they know that they can never satisfy someone else on the basis of looks alone, so they dare not go into the looks department because they'd know that those who are good looking would innately have more superficial/ dominarchical desires. So she'll stay with a loser because they'll be more kind to her. Because they can't criticize her in anyway where they themselves can't take the heat. (She knows that it's people's primal predilection to join in on any clique (that is high in the primality scales) that they are able to reside in so long as the pressure of criticism they'll inflict on him will be less than what can be said about them. And where someone on the hierarchies of mankind is prominent. On and around the same level those people are on the primal scales. Where they can be criticized/ admired on the same level they are. But if they can be criticized more/ admired less, receive more negativity and little positivity than those people then they will flock away eventually in their own self-serving streams of being. And you won't be able to resonate with them.
People stay away from those who are better than them. By primal predilection of those who will receive certain stimulus that on their primality/ dominarchicality capital that they will not be able to reside with. The overall status of how you are on all this. Well, the existentiarchy. For the environment. So Enviro-aptness. If you are an existing being there is usually a method by which organics reside in it. You need to master the basis of it. Being suitable for the material universe, and humanity's immaterial judgment system. All of these existentio-pressures will make people insecure if they are unfit for it. And when others are better suited, they will be critical of other people, and are willing to swerve the weak. People dont' want that kind of hit on their self esteem. human primality/ dominarchicality/ tyrannarchy. These are a part of human judgment when you prevail in the Biological Based Existentiarchy.
Where you are better suited/ evolutionarily equipped/ stronger/ faster/ more abilitated. People want to qualify for elite environments. Where you have high power in the Existentiarchy. And people's primarchical perception will see it. You have a perch by which you can use your tyrannicality and dominarchical position to cow/ criticize the weak, and they can't fight back.
Being a part of having a peerless package means you have no equal. For a girl's criteria of inclusion, the higher she is on the existentiarchy, then the more she will want to have others to have this same hierarchical capital. People and their inner primality want something for their suitor.
Raw Value based attraction. Where someone not conducive to your personal comfort, but has everything on your laundry list is who you'll pursue. Chad comes in here. 80-90% of relationships come in contact here.
Personal Position based attraction. Where you're looking for someone suited to your position. Where the things they have are not on your personal desire list, your primal desire, but because they meet your suitability scale/ suitorarchy, then they will be chosen. Beta providers come in here. I'd say about 80-90% of marriages come through here.
big difference between marriage and relationship.
The paragonic package for pairing, whether primality based or just on one's personal current position.
The problem isn't just that it's all about looks though. It's the panspanning standard across all scales of substance that forges the package they desire. And women have high affluence in the modern 1st world. They will not just settle for looks alone.
And all of these things are picked with the panspanning standard across all these scales with the need for htem to be suitable excellent. Incels/ mentalcels/ etc-cels can't hold a candle to maybe even any of these standards they have on any scale of substance.
It's not looks, it's the entire primality preference package. It ranges from raw aesthetic substance, to vibe, to finance, to power, etc. Typically amounting to you being the ethereal eminent enigma that shines down upon her emotional receptors as the being of her dreams/ the prospects bringing her ideal identity. Utterly pan-suitable for her preference.
Last edited:
