This article focuses on appearance and attractiveness discrimination in the American workplace.(in 2022 almost all country due to globalisation and western business practises)
this article discusses issues related to “lookism” and “lookphobia” as a real challenge for managers who are recruiting, attracting, interviewing, hiring, appraising, and promoting employees. The article provides a discussion of societal norms concerning “attractiveness,” the existence of appearance discrimination in employment, the presence of “preferring the pretty”,
From the article
A fair exterior is a silent recommendation” (Publilius Syrus, circa 42 B.C.).
appearance is part of a person’s non-verbal communication; and appearance is tied directly to “attractiveness.” And physical attractiveness, one readily must admit is a “prized possession”
“contemporary American society celebrates and embraces physical beauty with an inexhaustible force.” Corbett (2007, p. 153) also underscores that “at the beginning of the twenty-first century, American society was obsessed with physical appearance
James (2008, pp. 629-30) points out that when two equally qualified women apply for a position: “You would rather hire the applicant that you find more attractive because society taught you to associate beauty with other favorable characteristics.”
(now as most hr is foid they would hire good looking chad guy)
“Appearance matters in our society today more than it ever has before.” Corbett (2011, p. 625) further declares that “indeed, contemporary society seems to be utterly and completely obsessed with physical attractiveness.”
employers often make hiring decisions based on the appearance and attractiveness of the job applicants. James (2008, p. 229) indicates that “…outward appearance plays a significant role in everyday life.
Daniel Hamermesh, an economist at the University of Texas, over a lifetime and assuming today’s mean wages, “attractive” American workers on average make $230,000 more than their very plain-looking co-workers (Hamermesh 2011, p.47).
Corbett (2007, p. 154) relates that “clothing stores were hiring young, shapely, beautiful people who had ‘the look’ to be sales associates. Bars and restaurants were hiring pretty people.”
(if foids werent allowed to work then problems like this would not arise
now foids can use fakeup to increase their smv thus having advantage over men)
Employers, therefore, in order to survive, let alone prosper, in a very competitive and difficult economy, as well as in a society which places a premium on “good looks, very well might take steps to build an “attractive,” and concomitantly marketable, image, brand, or culture.
(I applied for a baggage handler position at airport they never called me back.)
@PPEcel @Gymcelled @Edmund_Kemper @TheDarkEnigma @BlkPillPres @Diocel @ThoughtfulCel @Blackpillapologist @TheProphetMuscle
this article discusses issues related to “lookism” and “lookphobia” as a real challenge for managers who are recruiting, attracting, interviewing, hiring, appraising, and promoting employees. The article provides a discussion of societal norms concerning “attractiveness,” the existence of appearance discrimination in employment, the presence of “preferring the pretty”,
From the article
A fair exterior is a silent recommendation” (Publilius Syrus, circa 42 B.C.).
appearance is part of a person’s non-verbal communication; and appearance is tied directly to “attractiveness.” And physical attractiveness, one readily must admit is a “prized possession”
“contemporary American society celebrates and embraces physical beauty with an inexhaustible force.” Corbett (2007, p. 153) also underscores that “at the beginning of the twenty-first century, American society was obsessed with physical appearance
James (2008, pp. 629-30) points out that when two equally qualified women apply for a position: “You would rather hire the applicant that you find more attractive because society taught you to associate beauty with other favorable characteristics.”
(now as most hr is foid they would hire good looking chad guy)
“Appearance matters in our society today more than it ever has before.” Corbett (2011, p. 625) further declares that “indeed, contemporary society seems to be utterly and completely obsessed with physical attractiveness.”
employers often make hiring decisions based on the appearance and attractiveness of the job applicants. James (2008, p. 229) indicates that “…outward appearance plays a significant role in everyday life.
Daniel Hamermesh, an economist at the University of Texas, over a lifetime and assuming today’s mean wages, “attractive” American workers on average make $230,000 more than their very plain-looking co-workers (Hamermesh 2011, p.47).
Corbett (2007, p. 154) relates that “clothing stores were hiring young, shapely, beautiful people who had ‘the look’ to be sales associates. Bars and restaurants were hiring pretty people.”
(if foids werent allowed to work then problems like this would not arise
now foids can use fakeup to increase their smv thus having advantage over men)
Employers, therefore, in order to survive, let alone prosper, in a very competitive and difficult economy, as well as in a society which places a premium on “good looks, very well might take steps to build an “attractive,” and concomitantly marketable, image, brand, or culture.
(I applied for a baggage handler position at airport they never called me back.)
One moment, please...
clutejournals.com
@PPEcel @Gymcelled @Edmund_Kemper @TheDarkEnigma @BlkPillPres @Diocel @ThoughtfulCel @Blackpillapologist @TheProphetMuscle
