Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

News lol if you think dating sites/app are the main contributor to the incel crisis

FuckFace

FuckFace

Colez Biker Gayng
★★★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
381
It's regular social media that does the most damage, by far.

Ugly woman posts pictures of her ugly face = hundreds of males rescuing the damsel from the one or two "mean" comments that actually told her how attractive she is (not at all).

Facebook, Twitter, Instagram = unholy trinity
 
Meh, I went to high school in the early 2000s before social media was really a thing. Technically it did exist, but social media didn't really start getting big until like 2006. But even when I was in high school, all the ugly girls and fat girls were dating up in looks, and often WAY up. Juggernaut law was in full effect.

Honestly, it's just biological differences between men and women.

Men are biologically hardwired to be desperate and take any woman they can get. They're hardwired to protect women and provide for them as well.

Women are hardwired to be selective because they're the ones who naturally carry the risk when it comes to pregnancy. Before modern medicine and modern technology, pregnancy carried a risk of death. Also a man could hypothetically impregnate 100 different women in a year whereas a woman could only give birth once during that amount of time.

Hypergamy is natural. It's a part of sexual selection.
 
Meh, I went to high school in the early 2000s before social media was really a thing. Technically it did exist, but social media didn't really start getting big until like 2006. But even when I was in high school, all the ugly girls and fat girls were dating up in looks, and often WAY up. Juggernaut law was in full effect.

Honestly, it's just biological differences between men and women.

Men are biologically hardwired to be desperate and take any woman they can get. They're hardwired to protect women and provide for them as well.

Women are hardwired to be selective because they're the ones who naturally carry the risk when it comes to pregnancy. Before modern medicine and modern technology, pregnancy carried a risk of death. Also a man could hypothetically impregnate 100 different women in a year whereas a woman could only give birth once during that amount of time.

Hypergamy is natural. It's a part of sexual selection.
yes too much is too much, we get men validating females existence white knights boosting females ego's. Why do you think females act tough and brave because of feminism.

Hon2


jfc i was basically a 9 10 years ago, now its in the 60%
 
It seems like shit got a lot worse around 2013 when Tinder started becoming popular
 
Meh, I went to high school in the early 2000s before social media was really a thing. Technically it did exist, but social media didn't really start getting big until like 2006. But even when I was in high school, all the ugly girls and fat girls were dating up in looks, and often WAY up. Juggernaut law was in full effect.

Disagree a bit. I feel like in the early 2000s things were still local. Peers and parents still had somewhat of an influence over who people dated. People were still somewhat looksmatched. IMO, everything changed in the late 2000s. The social media revolution allowed for anonymous communication. All of a sudden women were able to navigate around the approval of their local communities. This slightly started with facebook and really took off with dating apps. Each year I watched male sexual value plummet, and then like 2012 that shit hit a rock bottom. At that point, you had to be a Brad Pitt or Morris Chestnut doppleganger just to find a gf.

Honestly, it's just biological differences between men and women.

Men are biologically hardwired to be desperate and take any woman they can get. They're hardwired to protect women and provide for them as well.

Women are hardwired to be selective because they're the ones who naturally carry the risk when it comes to pregnancy. Before modern medicine and modern technology, pregnancy carried a risk of death. Also a man could hypothetically impregnate 100 different women in a year whereas a woman could only give birth once during that amount of time.

Hypergamy is natural. It's a part of sexual selection.
Gospel truth, but I feel like hypergamy was kept in check prior to 2008. Everything went to complete shit after the 90s/early 00s.
It seems like shit got a lot worse around 2013 when Tinder started becoming popular
TBH, it did.
 
Meh, I went to high school in the early 2000s before social media was really a thing. Technically it did exist, but social media didn't really start getting big until like 2006. But even when I was in high school, all the ugly girls and fat girls were dating up in looks, and often WAY up. Juggernaut law was in full effect.

Honestly, it's just biological differences between men and women.

Men are biologically hardwired to be desperate and take any woman they can get. They're hardwired to protect women and provide for them as well.

Women are hardwired to be selective because they're the ones who naturally carry the risk when it comes to pregnancy. Before modern medicine and modern technology, pregnancy carried a risk of death. Also a man could hypothetically impregnate 100 different women in a year whereas a woman could only give birth once during that amount of time.

Hypergamy is natural. It's a part of sexual selection.
I went to high school even before the internet (early 90-s) and I can confirm that it was the same as today.
 
Blaming dating apps or even normal media for your situation is the biggest cope ever, average looking desesperate normies have a long tradition of screwing ugly woman when they can't find their looksmatch, similary, ugly men has been tell since at least 50 years that they need to make money if they want to find a partner....

It's just that since we have internet now we can see what everyone experience except us, it's biology, nature, it started in the 60 with the sexual revolution decades before internet.
 
actually technology has sped up the process, literally gave females an ego boosts.
 
It's a combination of many biological and social factors that causes inceldom not dating sites or social media.
 
idk i think its tinder i mean its basically a buffet of guys in your hand without leaving the house. mixed with our lack of LMS=death. maybe people just went to bars back in the day instead of tinder, but you could still do that now lol.
 
cope, dating sites is still social factors.
Dating sites are just a tool that they use to make it easier for females to be promiscuous. They're not the real problem.
If all dating sites would get banned tomorrow not much would change in the long run.
 
Dating sites are just a tool that they use to make it easier for females to be promiscuous. They're not the real problem.
If all dating sites would get banned tomorrow not much would change in the long run.
yes, it is. you think approaching is any better?
online dating literally has made females become picky and raising their standards.
 
yes, it is. you think approaching is any better?
online dating literally has made females become picky and raising their standards.
Their standards hasn't changed. Before online dating was a thing it was just harder for females to find chads because they actually had to go out and meet people so they just settled for the best they could find.
 
Their standards hasn't changed. Before online dating was a thing it was just harder for females to find chads because they actually had to go out and meet people so they just settled for the best they could find.
yes it has, my pictures prove it,

Screenshot 20180801 135243


it was a high 9 in 2007 11 years later, at above average this is proof hypergamy is real.
 
Social media and online dating come from the same cloth. Both things are from the internet and they are used to filter out potential partners. Standards have change irreparably because of them both. In online dating you got a bunch of guys Dming you non stop. In Social Media you got a bunch of guys dming.. non stop. The end results are the same. The top tier folks get to filter out low quality people, while having many options.

Class is done for today.
 
Meh, I went to high school in the early 2000s before social media was really a thing. Technically it did exist, but social media didn't really start getting big until like 2006. But even when I was in high school, all the ugly girls and fat girls were dating up in looks, and often WAY up. Juggernaut law was in full effect.

Honestly, it's just biological differences between men and women.

Men are biologically hardwired to be desperate and take any woman they can get. They're hardwired to protect women and provide for them as well.

Women are hardwired to be selective because they're the ones who naturally carry the risk when it comes to pregnancy. Before modern medicine and modern technology, pregnancy carried a risk of death. Also a man could hypothetically impregnate 100 different women in a year whereas a woman could only give birth once during that amount of time.

Hypergamy is natural. It's a part of sexual selection.

Fellow oldcel here. I was in HS in the mid to late 2000's. Myspace was popular in those days as well as older dating sites like PoF (plenty of fat) and they definitely made things a lot worse for men but I can't help but feel that it wasn't nearly as bad as it is today. I'd say it was around the rise of Tumblr (2011 or so I guess) when PC culture -- and by extension female hypergamy as a corollary -- started to get to the extreme levels that they're at today. And now here we are.

Cucks in the tech industry need to think long term before they develop this kind of shit. Islamic countries that just outright ban those kinds of sites have the right idea. A true pro-male president would do the same.
 
Disagree a bit. I feel like in the early 2000s things were still local. Peers and parents still had somewhat of an influence over who people dated. People were still somewhat looksmatched. IMO, everything changed in the late 2000s. The social media revolution allowed for anonymous communication. All of a sudden women were able to navigate around the approval of their local communities. This slightly started with facebook and really took off with dating apps. Each year I watched male sexual value plummet, and then like 2012 that shit hit a rock bottom. At that point, you had to be a Brad Pitt or Morris Chestnut doppleganger just to find a gf.


Gospel truth, but I feel like hypergamy was kept in check prior to 2008. Everything went to complete shit after the 90s/early 00s.

TBH, it did.

This was the beginning of the end as it allowed all the foids and normalfaggots on the internet.

Screen Shot 2018 08 01 at 41713 PM
 
Meh, I went to high school in the early 2000s before social media was really a thing. Technically it did exist, but social media didn't really start getting big until like 2006. But even when I was in high school, all the ugly girls and fat girls were dating up in looks, and often WAY up. Juggernaut law was in full effect.

Honestly, it's just biological differences between men and women.

Men are biologically hardwired to be desperate and take any woman they can get. They're hardwired to protect women and provide for them as well.

Women are hardwired to be selective because they're the ones who naturally carry the risk when it comes to pregnancy. Before modern medicine and modern technology, pregnancy carried a risk of death. Also a man could hypothetically impregnate 100 different women in a year whereas a woman could only give birth once during that amount of time.

Hypergamy is natural. It's a part of sexual selection.
Just because it's natural doesn't mean it's right, remember animals also rape and eat their children for literally no reason, we are more than animals we shouldn't follow their primitivistic tendencies
 
yes it has, my pictures prove it,

View attachment 32608

it was a high 9 in 2007 11 years later, at above average this is proof hypergamy is real.
I'm not trying to say that hypergamy isn't real. Women want a chad today just like they did millions of years ago. The real problem is that feminism have made every subhuman blob feel entitled to a chad as the result men have become so desperate that they would put their dicks into anything that has a vagina. That's why you see high tier normies with disgusting landwhales.
 
I'm not trying to say that hypergamy isn't real. Women want a chad today just like they did millions of years ago. The real problem is that feminism have made every subhuman blob feel entitled to a chad as the result men have become so desperate that they would put their dicks into anything that has a vagina. That's why you see high tier normies with disgusting landwhales.
yes, but the perception of chad has changed, the fact you are missing the point is absurd.
Guys who work on themselves and self improve wont benefit from it. my pictures prove, A guy that is somewhat attractive will not be able to get laid or relationship because of females perception of things.
 
The fall of societal expectations for people to be marry their first girlfriend, and then the fall of societal expectations for people not to sleep around, and then apps like tinder have all contributed to the current state of affairs where the bottom 20% get jack shit, the next 75% get some and the top 5% get it all.
 
dating in 2018 is literally like lining up 5-10,000 guys against a wall and having the woman pick the best looking one.
 
Dating sites are just a tool that they use to make it easier for females to be promiscuous. They're not the real problem.
If all dating sites would get banned tomorrow not much would change in the long run.
It would be harder for women to communicate anonymously with potential sexual suitors. They would have to use older ways of finding sexual rendezvous which were much more dangerous and easier to detect. No doubt that removing dating websites would slow social decay.
This was the beginning of the end as it allowed all the foids and normalfaggots on the internet.

View attachment 32617
Totally, Iphone and popularization of the smartphone was one of the key factors that lead to the current dating market.
 
yes, but the perception of chad has changed, the fact you are missing the point is absurd.
Guys who work on themselves and self improve wont benefit from it. my pictures prove, A guy that is somewhat attractive will not be able to get laid or relationship because of females perception of things.

Lol you were never a "chad" you delusional moron, male beauty is the same now and 40.000 years before.

The only that has changed is that with social media culture, your social status depends more on your physical appearance, i bet that you are ostracized right now by society for some reason(with this not being the case in the past) and since you are average there's nothing left to compensate, that's why you don't get laid anymore as a former normie with 20+ lays.
 
Last edited:
It's a combination of many biological and social factors that causes inceldom not dating sites or social media.

Yes but these new things do exacerbate the issue.
 
Lol you were never a "chad" you delusional moron, male beauty is the same now and 40.000 years before.

The only that has changed is that with social media culture, your social status depends more on your physical appearance, i bet that you are ostracized right now by society for some reason(with this not being the case in the past) and since you are average there's nothing left to compensate, that's why you don't get laid anymore as a former normie with 20+ lays.
never said anything i was a chad, the fact my rating was a 9.4 on hotornot proves that a guy who was slightly attractive, going from a 9.4 to an above average male in the looks scale. Proves that female preception guy has changed literally.

male beauty has changed exponentially, you can literally see it through past. even male beauty was alot different in modern times.

the fact that male models are the prime example what females lust over, basically calvin klein models. so tell me were there calvin klein models in the past?

this is an example how men are objectified as sex symbols.


jordan peterson perfectly puts it in this video



women now are choosing chads as the "alpha"

 
Last edited:
yes too much is too much, we get men validating females existence white knights boosting females ego's. Why do you think females act tough and brave because of feminism.

View attachment 32585

jfc i was basically a 9 10 years ago, now its in the 60%
I never got the story of how you went from normal guy to blackpilled misogynist. Have you posted that story somewhere, or can you tell us? I know some people give you shit, but you're kind of a rare breed, and I am curious what led you to this.

Is it like that Gerard Butler movie?
MV5BMTM2MTM2OTUwNl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNTgwNTE0Mg@@._V1_.jpg
 
I never got the story of how you went from normal guy to blackpilled misogynist. Have you posted that story somewhere, or can you tell us? I know some people give you shit, but you're kind of rare, and I am curious what led you to this.

Is it like that Gerard Butler movie?
MV5BMTM2MTM2OTUwNl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNTgwNTE0Mg@@._V1_.jpg
well the fact i had plenty of rejections from females and getting fired from work because of them. Well also the PUA community aswell and the fact females just want to sleep around and not give a shit. I cant even get into a relationship let alone sex.
 
Don't neglect the economic factors. Welfare and the workplace now being catered to women, mean that women don't need men anymore. They no longer have to trade their sexuality for resources, the state enslaves men and gives women their resources. You might argue this doesn't apply to young Staceys, but it all filters down.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top