proudweeb
TOP 0.1% onlyfans performER
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2021
- Posts
- 2,883
Study Link
"A recent study co-authored by researchers from three American universities found that physically-attractive real estate agents listed homes that were on average $20,275 more expensive than listings secured by their average-looking counterparts, all else being equal. And not only did they list for higher prices, they also sold homes for an average of $15,622 more than average-looking listing agents could."
"In a series of surveys Dr. Hamermesh helped conduct in the United States and Canada, the conclusion was when all other things are taken into account, ugly people earn less than average incomes, while beautiful people earn more than the average. The “ugliness penalty” for men was -9% below the average, while the beauty premium was +5% over the average (a 14% differential between ends of the spectrum). For women, the effect was less pronounced, contrary to common social myths: the ugliness penalty was -6% while the beauty premium was +4% (a 10% differential). Nor were the U.S. and Canada shallow exceptions: when the survey was repeated in other countries, similar results were found."
This was in 2013 when real estate markets were garbage, so it's probably almost twice the difference today.
Water is wet I'm sure, but it's interesting to see statistical proof of the blackpill from a source different than the usual dating site studies or what-not. Looks not only influence your dating life, but also the resale value of your property
"A recent study co-authored by researchers from three American universities found that physically-attractive real estate agents listed homes that were on average $20,275 more expensive than listings secured by their average-looking counterparts, all else being equal. And not only did they list for higher prices, they also sold homes for an average of $15,622 more than average-looking listing agents could."
"In a series of surveys Dr. Hamermesh helped conduct in the United States and Canada, the conclusion was when all other things are taken into account, ugly people earn less than average incomes, while beautiful people earn more than the average. The “ugliness penalty” for men was -9% below the average, while the beauty premium was +5% over the average (a 14% differential between ends of the spectrum). For women, the effect was less pronounced, contrary to common social myths: the ugliness penalty was -6% while the beauty premium was +4% (a 10% differential). Nor were the U.S. and Canada shallow exceptions: when the survey was repeated in other countries, similar results were found."
This was in 2013 when real estate markets were garbage, so it's probably almost twice the difference today.
Water is wet I'm sure, but it's interesting to see statistical proof of the blackpill from a source different than the usual dating site studies or what-not. Looks not only influence your dating life, but also the resale value of your property