S
LifeFuel Lifefuel for curries - More curry men marry white women than vice versa
holy shit its over for ricecels
whitecels taking gook women and producing hapas. expect another ER soon
whitecels taking gook women and producing hapas. expect another ER soon
Probably punjabis
Never seen a white girl with a southern indian irl or online
Never seen a white girl with a southern indian irl or online
JBW proven wrong. It's over for ugly white men who want curry girls.
Betabux unless Chadpreet.
J
Wtf all the races are slowly getting bleached
N
Jap males are biggest slayers of white poon according to that chart
I would guess almost always with M and S
I would guess almost always with M and S
Curries in the USA are fucking loaded, that's why. Poor curry = no white pussy
MARRIED is the keyword there. Do you have a graph where Indian men hook up with white women? No? Ok, no ""life fuel"" here.
S
Married is better than hooking up you degenerate
Women value the men they hook up with FAR more than the poor sap they have to settle with in their 30's.
Fuckin curries stealing our women.
Just be curry theory confirmed once again.
Just be curry theory confirmed once again.
Thanks for the curry lifefuel. Brb, marrying white girl
Just be Curry confirmed
Copes shattered.
What do the numbers in the brackets on the left side mean? total marriages by that group?
I
@NegroKing @chudur-budur
Marriage is cuckoldry
This. Also, frivorce laws etc...
This lol.
People on this forum are retard af:
Indian male: 24.8% of 243 = 60.26
Pakistani male: 12.7% of 30 = 3.81
Total curry marrying crackerwhores = 64.07 ~ 64
Vietnamese male: 19.4% of 115 = 22.3
Laotian male: 12.2% of 17 = 2.074
Korean male: 29.9% of 153 = 45.74
Japanese male: 35.4% of 161 = 56.99
Filipino male: 29.7% of 370 = 109.89
Chinese male: 21.9% of 424 = 92.85
Cambodian male: 13.9% of 27 = 3.75
Total rice marrying crackerwhores = 333.594 ~ 334
Hispanic male: 31.2% of 10872 = 3392.06 ~ 3392
Black male: 14.3% of 11047 = 1579.72 ~ 1580
Rices fuck more than 5 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
Blacks fuck 25 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
Hispanics fuck 53 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
CURRIES ARE THE BOTTOM OF THE BARREL. IT'S CURRY OVER.
People on this forum are retard af:
Indian male: 24.8% of 243 = 60.26
Pakistani male: 12.7% of 30 = 3.81
Total curry marrying crackerwhores = 64.07 ~ 64
Vietnamese male: 19.4% of 115 = 22.3
Laotian male: 12.2% of 17 = 2.074
Korean male: 29.9% of 153 = 45.74
Japanese male: 35.4% of 161 = 56.99
Filipino male: 29.7% of 370 = 109.89
Chinese male: 21.9% of 424 = 92.85
Cambodian male: 13.9% of 27 = 3.75
Total rice marrying crackerwhores = 333.594 ~ 334
Hispanic male: 31.2% of 10872 = 3392.06 ~ 3392
Black male: 14.3% of 11047 = 1579.72 ~ 1580
Rices fuck more than 5 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
Blacks fuck 25 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
Hispanics fuck 53 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
CURRIES ARE THE BOTTOM OF THE BARREL. IT'S CURRY OVER.
People on this forum are retard af:
Indian male: 24.8% of 243 = 60.26
Pakistani male: 12.7% of 30 = 3.81
Total curry marrying crackerwhores = 64.07 ~ 64
Vietnamese male: 19.4% of 115 = 22.3
Laotian male: 12.2% of 17 = 2.074
Korean male: 29.9% of 153 = 45.74
Japanese male: 35.4% of 161 = 56.99
Filipino male: 29.7% of 370 = 109.89
Chinese male: 21.9% of 424 = 92.85
Cambodian male: 13.9% of 27 = 3.75
Total rice marrying crackerwhores = 333.594 ~ 334
Hispanic male: 31.2% of 10872 = 3392.06 ~ 3392
Black male: 14.3% of 11047 = 1579.72 ~ 1580
Rices fuck more than 5 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
Blacks fuck 25 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
Hispanics fuck 53 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
CURRIES ARE THE BOTTOM OF THE BARREL. IT'S CURRY OVER.
People on this forum are retard af:
Indian male: 24.8% of 243 = 60.26
Pakistani male: 12.7% of 30 = 3.81
Total curry marrying crackerwhores = 64.07 ~ 64
Vietnamese male: 19.4% of 115 = 22.3
Laotian male: 12.2% of 17 = 2.074
Korean male: 29.9% of 153 = 45.74
Japanese male: 35.4% of 161 = 56.99
Filipino male: 29.7% of 370 = 109.89
Chinese male: 21.9% of 424 = 92.85
Cambodian male: 13.9% of 27 = 3.75
Total rice marrying crackerwhores = 333.594 ~ 334
Hispanic male: 31.2% of 10872 = 3392.06 ~ 3392
Black male: 14.3% of 11047 = 1579.72 ~ 1580
Rices fuck more than 5 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
Blacks fuck 25 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
Hispanics fuck 53 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
CURRIES ARE THE BOTTOM OF THE BARREL. IT'S CURRY OVER.
People on this forum are retard af:
Indian male: 24.8% of 243 = 60.26
Pakistani male: 12.7% of 30 = 3.81
Total curry marrying crackerwhores = 64.07 ~ 64
Vietnamese male: 19.4% of 115 = 22.3
Laotian male: 12.2% of 17 = 2.074
Korean male: 29.9% of 153 = 45.74
Japanese male: 35.4% of 161 = 56.99
Filipino male: 29.7% of 370 = 109.89
Chinese male: 21.9% of 424 = 92.85
Cambodian male: 13.9% of 27 = 3.75
Total rice marrying crackerwhores = 333.594 ~ 334
Hispanic male: 31.2% of 10872 = 3392.06 ~ 3392
Black male: 14.3% of 11047 = 1579.72 ~ 1580
Rices fuck more than 5 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
Blacks fuck 25 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
Hispanics fuck 53 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
CURRIES ARE THE BOTTOM OF THE BARREL. IT'S CURRY OVER.
People on this forum are retard af:
Indian male: 24.8% of 243 = 60.26
Pakistani male: 12.7% of 30 = 3.81
Total curry marrying crackerwhores = 64.07 ~ 64
Vietnamese male: 19.4% of 115 = 22.3
Laotian male: 12.2% of 17 = 2.074
Korean male: 29.9% of 153 = 45.74
Japanese male: 35.4% of 161 = 56.99
Filipino male: 29.7% of 370 = 109.89
Chinese male: 21.9% of 424 = 92.85
Cambodian male: 13.9% of 27 = 3.75
Total rice marrying crackerwhores = 333.594 ~ 334
Hispanic male: 31.2% of 10872 = 3392.06 ~ 3392
Black male: 14.3% of 11047 = 1579.72 ~ 1580
Rices fuck more than 5 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
Blacks fuck 25 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
Hispanics fuck 53 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
CURRIES ARE THE BOTTOM OF THE BARREL. IT'S CURRY OVER.
People on this forum are retard af:
Indian male: 24.8% of 243 = 60.26
Pakistani male: 12.7% of 30 = 3.81
Total curry marrying crackerwhores = 64.07 ~ 64
Vietnamese male: 19.4% of 115 = 22.3
Laotian male: 12.2% of 17 = 2.074
Korean male: 29.9% of 153 = 45.74
Japanese male: 35.4% of 161 = 56.99
Filipino male: 29.7% of 370 = 109.89
Chinese male: 21.9% of 424 = 92.85
Cambodian male: 13.9% of 27 = 3.75
Total rice marrying crackerwhores = 333.594 ~ 334
Hispanic male: 31.2% of 10872 = 3392.06 ~ 3392
Black male: 14.3% of 11047 = 1579.72 ~ 1580
Rices fuck more than 5 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
Blacks fuck 25 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
Hispanics fuck 53 times more cracker pussies than curries fuck.
CURRIES ARE THE BOTTOM OF THE BARREL. IT'S CURRY OVER.
Sorry dude but your logic is retarded. You say that rice fuck 5 times white girls but you don't see the number of rice guys in the population. The number of rice guys is over 1200 in this experiment when you sum all the races. Now you are basically comparing 243 Indians with 1200+ ricecels and then you say they fuck 5 times, lol. Same goes for other races. Also considering the fact that Indians usually marry within their race these numbers are actually quite good compared to how the curries on this forum cope.
WHat's the main diff btween Punjabi curries and other curries? Curious.
This guy is the Chaddest curry I've ever seen
@chudhur-budur
why tf did you post that bullshit 4 times
The logic is retarded. He says that rice fuck 5 times white girls but doesn't see the number of rice guys in the population. The number of rice guys is over 1200 in this experiment when we sum all the races. Now he is basically comparing 243 Indians with 1200+ ricecels and then he says they fuck 5 times, lol. Same goes for other races. Also considering the fact that Indians usually marry within their race these numbers are actually quite good compared to how the curries on this forum cope.
Punjabis are from North India and they have fairer skin and more Caucasoid features. On the other hand most Indian curries, especially from South India have darker skin and have subhuman features most of the time. Most bollywood actors and actress are either Punjabis or Muslims. Example of Punjabi a guy. Although he is an actor but Punjabis on the whole usually look better so you will find a lot of good looking people in the Punjabi population.
This thread is proof that curries cannot be incel
Hit the nail on the head.
Thnx
There can be another explanation, according to this stats, the total number of 25-29 aged curry males in the US is 139100 in 2016. Let's be extremely optimistic, let's say 10% of them are 2nd gen curry who are actually marriage aged, the number is 13910. Among them only 243 are getting married and the rest of them are incels. Moreover, 243 is from 2008-2016, kek, I am taking number from 2016 only.
This also confirms my calculation to some extent:
http://www.indiawest.com/news/globa...cle_cb7df7a8-fd78-11e4-9ea2-ef7b66a88f7b.html
Hit this. and stop coping.
refute that bullshit then.WHat's the main diff btween Punjabi curries and other curries? Curious.
This guy is the Chaddest curry I've ever seen
@chudhur-budur
why tf did you post that bullshit 4 times
The extent to which one would go to shit on their own race.
First of all the numbers in the original image are not absolute numbers. If you think only 243 Indian males married in USA between 2008-2016 then it's over for you even in arranged marriages. These are statistics and the numbers are part of a sample set. You really think only 110k white males in USA married in that period of 8 years? Just to draw a comparison the number of White males for the age group 25-29 in 2012 was 7,000,000 (assuming sex ratio 1:1, total number is in this data). Now you tell me. Out of 7 million white men, only 110,000 married (using your logic). So rest are Incels?
Also that article that you added doesn't mean shit. Just because less Indians are marrying doesn't mean rest are all Incels. Lots of white people are unmarried, doesn't mean they are all Incels. It just means that more people are choosing to be single or rather unmarried. And that was the whole point of the article as was obvious from its religious tone.
I don't understand why you put this much effort just to shit on your own race. And in the end the logic and math you use is also wrong.
Keep coping.
Your comparison with white population is correct, that means the number in OPs chart is meaningless or it's incomplete or it has some other meaning. Small sample set is not a good statistical measure, therefore my assumption is wrong, but that does not prove yours is correct. But a big number of USA bred 2nd gen curries are not getting married/laid to whites, inceldom proves that. Otherwise you won't see so many curries on incel forums and other places like TRP, MGTOW or FA.
Lol, how much are you going to cope dude. I remember talking to you once and it amazes me how much effort you put into shitting on curries despite being a curry. Your logic in the past 2 posts were clearly wrong which I proved and so was the Maths used. Now you are saying that sample set isn't a good statistical measure. Fair to say that Math and stats isn't your strong area so I won't argue on that with you anymore.
Also as the polls have proved earlier most guys on these forums are white. You keep coping for whatever reasons you do.
N
love the names
rice, curry, crackers, towel heads
whats a good stereo type for Latina, Mexican and a blacks
rice, curry, crackers, towel heads
whats a good stereo type for Latina, Mexican and a blacks
Buying into some bs claims like "many curries are getting married to whites" is the cope, which I am trying to refute, now rethink who is coping here. The issue of sample size is mentioned by you first, not me. My question was, if a small sample size proves my hypothesis wrong, then how does it make yours correct? I am genuinely baffled at your thought process. And I did not do any "math", those are called addition, multiplication, division and rouding boyo and all my calcuation are on the data from OP's post.
Btw, I go through tremendous amount of pointless hardwork in a great length just to shit on my own race, this is my cope. I would say a better cope than making up some sloppy claim.
I mentioned issue of sample size because you were comparing the number 243 with the 13910 population which can't be done. The sample size isn't the issue, your comparison is the issue. The sample set doesn't cover the full population and that is why it is a sample.
What is the basis of your hypotheses? In the first post you compared the marriages by Indians with marriages by Asians when the population of those groups differed by a factor of 5. In the second post you were comparing the total Indian 25-29 age male population with the number in the sample set which is again wrong. And then you say you are baffled at my thought process. I literally just pointed out the problems in your hypothesis/calculations etc whatever you call them. I didn't even put my views. I just showed how your logic to prove the stats wrong was itself wrong.
Also I didn't even make any claim. You have been making sloppy claims based on your incorrect hypothesis. Unless you have studied probability and statistics in college, do both of us a favor, and don't reply to this post. I was expecting a better reply from you but it is clear that you are not a technical guy. However the problem is not with not being a technical guy, the problem is that you are not even using basic math and stats concepts correctly when you are trying to prove a statistical survey done by some statisticians wrong. And on top of that you are saying that others are coping.
Last edited:
these stats mean nothing all those currys are betabux used white gold digging whores
Yup you are right that was complete stupid comparing 243 with 13910, as stupid as the person who made that chart in the first place.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
