Liberalism for third world countries is a bad idea

[Caesercel]

And maybe so is it's child capitalism but I'm not sure about that. All liberty does for a bunch of poor fucks living in slums is give them the ideological means to drown themselves in drugs , alcohol , sexual degeneracy and completely destroy any semblance of social order and ethics. As they devolve into man eat man chaos. The biggest examples of such failed systems could be latin america or the ghettos of black America. Something like Islam would've served these people better since it's good at keeping the plebs in line. Traditional conservatism prevents them from destroying themselves.

Individualism simply doesn't work in poverty. It fits better to rich countries like Norway or Japan where the culture is regimented anyways so it doesn't matter if they smoke a bit of bong or be a whore

 

[Fluoxymesterone]

I agree, high iq

 

[DarkStar]

I support Ethno-Nationalism, Socialism, and Traditionalism in the actual meaning(not christian meaning)for Europe+NEA, but Liberalism for the Turd world.

 

[wereq]

I support Ethno-Nationalism, Socialism, and Traditionalism in the actual meaning(not christian meaning)for Europe+NEA, but Liberalism for the Turd world.

Liberalism for 3rd world like MENA and curryland is necessary to reduce birth rates.

 

[DarkStar]

Liberalism for 3rd world like MENA and curryland is necessary to reduce birth rates.

LatAm & Africa also

 

[AutistSupremacist]

I support Ethno-Nationalism, Socialism, and Traditionalism in the actual meaning(not christian meaning)for Europe+NEA, but Liberalism for the Turd world.

Are you a duginist?

 

[Koomersarj]

I support Ethno-Nationalism, Socialism, and Traditionalism in the actual meaning(not christian meaning)for Europe+NEA, but Liberalism for the Turd world.

 

[mamacacoincel]

And maybe so is it's child capitalism but I'm not sure about that. All liberty does for a bunch of poor fucks living in slums is give them the ideological means to drown themselves in drugs , alcohol , sexual degeneracy and completely destroy any semblance of social order and ethics. As they devolve into man eat man chaos. The biggest examples of such failed systems could be latin america or the ghettos of black America. Something like Islam would've served these people better since it's good at keeping the plebs in line. Traditional conservatism prevents them from destroying themselves.

Individualism simply doesn't work in poverty. It fits better to rich countries like Norway or Japan where the culture is regimented anyways so it doesn't matter if they smoke a bit of bong or be a whore

latam (brazil) is not liberal at all, but have all this sex free and tons of drugs, even at dictatorship period. i just wanna liberal economic for buy cheap thing.

 

[Castaway]

Are you a duginist?

Dugin is against ethno-nationalism

 

[AutistSupremacist]

Dugin is against ethno-nationalism

Well yea, but the traditionalist and socialist thing. The only people who advocate that are the fourth theory ( Duginist)people, strasserists and MAGA Communists

 

[sexualeconomist]

And maybe so is it's child capitalism but I'm not sure about that. All liberty does for a bunch of poor fucks living in slums is give them the ideological means to drown themselves in drugs , alcohol , sexual degeneracy and completely destroy any semblance of social order and ethics. As they devolve into man eat man chaos. The biggest examples of such failed systems could be latin america or the ghettos of black America. Something like Islam would've served these people better since it's good at keeping the plebs in line. Traditional conservatism prevents them from destroying themselves.

Individualism simply doesn't work in poverty. It fits better to rich countries like Norway or Japan where the culture is regimented anyways so it doesn't matter if they smoke a bit of bong or be a whore

Liberalism is bad period full stop not further explanation required

 

[based_meme]

It's arguably worse for countries whose societies and respective cultures are counter or antithetical to the fundamental values of philosophical liberalism, specifically individualism and total personal autonomy. Imagine taking a conservative, collectivist culture and introducing sexual liberty (as a result of individual freedom). We can see glimpses of the effects of that kind of radical shift (sometimes referred to as "culture shock") when you have sexually repressed and sheltered people being thrust into this kind of society like a babe in the liberal wilds. The behavioral pendulum swings to the opposite end and they behave in ways that are seen as abnormal or extreme by the average person within that culture.

Imagine taking a sex-starved Paki guy who's used to women walking around veiled and wearing loose, baggy clothes in a strict, Islamic patriarchy and throwing him in a California nude beach. He would turn into an instant viral sensation for being an ultra creep and groping as much tits, ass and pussy as his arms can handle. The dude might even go full degenerate and just start publicly fapping right there and then.

 

[Poopless One]

Imagine taking a sex-starved Paki guy who's used to women walking around veiled and wearing loose, baggy clothes in a strict, Islamic patriarchy and throwing him in a California nude beach. He would turn into an instant viral sensation for being an ultra creep and groping as much tits, ass and pussy as his arms can handle. The dude might even go full degenerate and just start publicly fapping right there and then.

 

[stalkerKiller]

I agree, some sort of centralized system needs to direct development usually. This could be a technocracy or an oligarchy. Either way you get more stable results the less freedom the population has.