Serious liberalism and anarchy

[cinderogre]

liberalism swill eventually lead to anarchism in the name of progress. because liberalism is all about defying the already existing social structures in theme of oppression and injustice.they introduce a new idea because they percieve it to be injustice or intolerant but a few years later they would have found a new injustice to cope with their boredom of not being active.they believe for some reason our society is not in the right place right now and need constant reformation and improvement. when people call ou their crazy reforms, people are labeled as narrow-minded,less progressive and backward.they will keep on banning good things and allowing bad things until the society
at one point of time in future completely cease to exist.i believe hierchcial pre enlightenment society is the best because it aims to focus on the best interests of the particular nation or a group and doesn't allow principles like equality, liberity and freedom to take advantage and turn that society into a cucked egalitarian shithole that moves into the future with auto destructive mindset.

 

[stalin22]

Liberalism won't lead to anarchy
But anarcho tyranny

 

[cinderogre]

Liberalism won't lead to anarchy
But anarcho tyranny

whatever it maybe iam sure about one thing it will destroy the society

 

[cinderogre]

any opinions

 

[sulpuda]

Even if you're right, eventually liberals will form their own government because they will believe they are the only justice. Let's say you're a libertarian and you ultimately toppled the "evil society." then the "progress" you're going to have to make is to establish an organization that will actively identify and eliminate discrimination in the world. If they form a government, it will be a country like the Soviet Union that considers itself the most complete political system and does not allow any criticism.

 

[cinderogre]

Even if you're right, eventually liberals will form their own government because they will believe they are the only justice. Let's say you're a libertarian and you ultimately toppled the "evil society." then the "progress" you're going to have to make is to establish an organization that will actively identify and eliminate discrimination in the world. If they form a government, it will be a country like the Soviet Union that considers itself the most complete political system and does not allow any criticism.

but what we define progress is subjective to the time period.
no one can actually be truly progressive no matter how hard they try. ecvn if they actually introduce many progressive policies, as time goes on the people of the future will look at them as not being progressives and narrow-minded
we cannot defiantly say how the polcitcla systems will look like 1000 years from now.
u motioned Soviet Union being progressive.
If a person for example happen to exist in a time period when Soviet Union existed as a country they might view the atheistic communistic government and its policies proggressive compared to the authoritarian and nationalistic and fascistic governments that existed at that time period. but if u view it from perspective of a person who is currently living in 2024 it defiantly appears very tyrannical and authorization so basically there is no true so called progress liberals like to harp about. no matter how much progressive policies they create or support it will be still tainted in the conservative and tradiotnal cultural influces of the particular time period it existed.

 

[cinderogre]

Even if you're right, eventually liberals will form their own government because they will believe they are the only justice. Let's say you're a libertarian and you ultimately toppled the "evil society." then the "progress" you're going to have to make is to establish an organization that will actively identify and eliminate discrimination in the world. If they form a government, it will be a country like the Soviet Union that considers itself the most complete political system and does not allow any criticism.

modern liberalism is pacifistic in nature I guess