svgmn1
Soon to become a wizard...
★★★★★
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2021
- Posts
- 15,651
- Online time
- 1d 7h
I find it comical how under any remotely or barely blackpilled post on soycial media currently, you are guaranteed to find a comment on the lines of "op is definitely indian" as a mocking attempt.
This of course began way too earlier than this year back when looksmaxzing made it to the mainstream, I didn't care much about it tbh but I always found it intriguingly comical, comically hypocritical if anything.
Picture this: you're a normie tier male, you found a blackpill/manosphere related thread that was too uncomfortable, avoided to make an argument or a retort and immediately jumped to cope by jester or zoomer level mockery, sometimes pinpointing the poster's location from his account depending on the platform to make it on a personal level, all of this is just the regular, what is hypocritical is when the post/poster isn't even an ethnicel or even an incel, or the post isn't even about ethnicity, yet you point the finger of blame towards a race of fuglier men or other groups incels who suffer from the same things you suffer from to a greater degree the same way foids frame ugly males as the core problem.
If you carefully take your time to understand what all this means you'll realize I am clearly not making an argument against racism or jester, neither I am crying about racepill related inferiority or copes like JBW nor I am defending curries here, I firmly believe all of us are racist, I'm just showing the comical contrast and seperation in this case, when the process of finding a culprit in one's case turns to a holding an easy target who suffered from the same ardours that one went through to greater degree as a scapegoat.
There would be many explanations to this, the most rational one my mind concluded is the need to exclude your pertinence to the target in an argument, one which could possibly make you feel vulnerable or exposed.
These responses come from people who want nothing more than excluding themselves from being inferior, not necessarily just excluding themselves from being a currynigger or a sandnigger or a beanernigger or a ricenigger. This self-based exclusion from a said group while deflecting the blame towards easier targets (some races are just easier to use as lolcows, not that they don't deserve to be used as lolcows) and framing them as the culprits behind the uncomfortable reality gives them a safe highground to feel better about the uncomfortable truths they face in life, it's exactly like a bullied kid getting mad from being bullied, so he decides to bully another bullied kid who's weaker than him in retaliation (I witnessed this human behavior a LOT when I was young, still do but in different forms like this one)
it also shows fear of facing what it is and avoiding a direct confrontation
This of course began way too earlier than this year back when looksmaxzing made it to the mainstream, I didn't care much about it tbh but I always found it intriguingly comical, comically hypocritical if anything.
Picture this: you're a normie tier male, you found a blackpill/manosphere related thread that was too uncomfortable, avoided to make an argument or a retort and immediately jumped to cope by jester or zoomer level mockery, sometimes pinpointing the poster's location from his account depending on the platform to make it on a personal level, all of this is just the regular, what is hypocritical is when the post/poster isn't even an ethnicel or even an incel, or the post isn't even about ethnicity, yet you point the finger of blame towards a race of fuglier men or other groups incels who suffer from the same things you suffer from to a greater degree the same way foids frame ugly males as the core problem.
If you carefully take your time to understand what all this means you'll realize I am clearly not making an argument against racism or jester, neither I am crying about racepill related inferiority or copes like JBW nor I am defending curries here, I firmly believe all of us are racist, I'm just showing the comical contrast and seperation in this case, when the process of finding a culprit in one's case turns to a holding an easy target who suffered from the same ardours that one went through to greater degree as a scapegoat.
There would be many explanations to this, the most rational one my mind concluded is the need to exclude your pertinence to the target in an argument, one which could possibly make you feel vulnerable or exposed.
These responses come from people who want nothing more than excluding themselves from being inferior, not necessarily just excluding themselves from being a currynigger or a sandnigger or a beanernigger or a ricenigger. This self-based exclusion from a said group while deflecting the blame towards easier targets (some races are just easier to use as lolcows, not that they don't deserve to be used as lolcows) and framing them as the culprits behind the uncomfortable reality gives them a safe highground to feel better about the uncomfortable truths they face in life, it's exactly like a bullied kid getting mad from being bullied, so he decides to bully another bullied kid who's weaker than him in retaliation (I witnessed this human behavior a LOT when I was young, still do but in different forms like this one)
it also shows fear of facing what it is and avoiding a direct confrontation
Last edited:





