Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment lets close this debate once and for all

height vs face


  • Total voters
    68
Face is more important than Height, some people here think If they're 2 inches taller they can ascend when in reality the problem is their face.
 
FACEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
 
The significance of face is slightly higher overall, but both of them are particularly consequential when it pertains to one's physical attractiveness.
i don t think so, maybe in online yeah, but irl, i don t think saw, i saw many foids with very ugly tallfags both irl or on social media, but i never saw foids with someone very,very short but with a beautiful face that s why overall for the average foid u still need height atleast to get a gf, but for the beautiful foids u need both!

but for some average foid that s not so good looking, being tall is enough because of everything that height gives u because u are a man!
but if ur short and beautiful face, it s pointless because foids won t even see u as a man, u won t even be able to make her even have a thought of reproducing with u because ur too short, she would choose someone uglier but taller with a big penis
 
The true real answer is that there will never be a clear answer to this question.

It will always depend on the foid's preferences, on how ugly/handsome someone is, and on how short/tall someone is.
 
Your face is your base SMV, and your height is your SMV multiplier.
 
Face is more important but that doesn't mean height doesn't matter. They both matter I just think face is slightly more important.
 
Anyone who says height is living in an alternative reality
 
60 % face 40 % height i would say in dating
I actually used to believe the same as you, but OKcupid, Tinder, etc when they released their data proved otherwise.

I will put it another way, if the man is 6'5, but has a 4/10 face, compared to someone who is 5'6 but with a 9/10 face, will never be able to have the same quality of life and experiences with women. I have seen this for myself in public.

Personally, as a subjective criteria I would put it at around 85-90% looks, 10-15% height. The only issue with making statements like this is that height and looks are generally not mutually exclusive, I can't be bothered to right the whole reasoning though
 
Women are obviously attracted to height, though they do also appreciate a handsome face. The obsession some Americans (and especially manlets) have with height on these spaces is a bit strange (homoeroticism?), but the truth is that height isn't too relevant if you aren't actually short and have a decent face.
 
I strongly believe that with a good face and looks in general more doors will be open for you in the world.

Fpr example look at some of most well known actors who are also the most successful.

It doesn't even matter whether they are genuinely good actor.

Some actos that immediately cross my mind are Tom Cruise, Robert Downey Junior, Michael J Fox, Robin Williams.

What do they all have in common? They are very short BUT all of them are attractive to very attractive.
Brad Pitt for example isn't that tall either. Not even six foot, but he has that face. The body is easier ro shape than the face also.

Robert De Niro is also a short fella, but his face saves him.

Think about it. And now look at this Luigi Mangione fella. Yes, the foids were disappointed once they've found out that he was "short" but they did like his looks and do find him attractive.

He does have his groupies.
 
I actually used to believe the same as you, but OKcupid, Tinder, etc when they released their data proved otherwise.

I will put it another way, if the man is 6'5, but has a 4/10 face, compared to someone who is 5'6 but with a 9/10 face, will never be able to have the same quality of life and experiences with women. I have seen this for myself in public.

Personally, as a subjective criteria I would put it at around 85-90% looks, 10-15% height. The only issue with making statements like this is that height and looks are generally not mutually exclusive, I can't be bothered to right the whole reasoning though
Yeah, it doesn't surprise me at all that my height doesn't help me on dating apps.

Tbh, your observation made me realize just how over it is for me.

This is beyond brutal. It is just demoralizing.

I mean, I ain't stupid. I see my lack of results on the apps, so. If my DMs are just ignored or declined at best then I don't even have to bother sitting there and waiting until the foids come to me.

They won't.
I have checked my male competition and I am not blind. Most of the dude look so much better in evey aspect.

I simply stand no chance looks wise.
 
As someone who struggles with both, height is definitely more important.
 
If you're a manlet you're not even being treated a person/adult man. If you have an ugly face you just won't have good chances with girls that's all.
 
Ugly face = over for dating
Short = over in life
 
height is everything
 
Even with a great face you need to at least be taller than her. Women want a dude that's taller than them, from what I've seen. Thus I picked height.
 
i have met many tall incels
i have never met a beautiful incel
I have. He looked like if anne and Cillian murphy had a child but he was 5ft 2, its not only the height at that point, his limbs are that of a child, no woman can imagine him on top of her :feelsrope:
 

Similar threads

Castaway
Replies
22
Views
984
OverLoner
OverLoner
Clavicus Vile
Replies
15
Views
1K
EigouKaiki ∞
EigouKaiki ∞
Ryo_Hazuki
Replies
52
Views
918
Rapistcel
Rapistcel
LeFrenchCel
Replies
36
Views
2K
DjentlemanDuke
DjentlemanDuke
AscendOrDieTrying
Replies
19
Views
674
AscendOrDieTrying
AscendOrDieTrying

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top