<Dating
<Incel
Foids are fucking braindead.
Cope, virgin but not incel copers are still incels.
<Incel
Foids are fucking braindead.
Cope, virgin but not incel copers are still incels.
Seething holes.
D
Yes, the "incel community". Retarded foids 
they can't stand not being able to censor us on this forum
Words have no meaning to foids, they view them as tools to achieve a goal and manipulate others. This is why so many words (bigot, racist, incel, nazi, etc.) lost any meaning, it's because foids kept using them to shun men they don't like. This is also why they call married men "incels".
Being a virgin male in 2025 is worse than terrorism to toilets. Amazing
Censorship is probably among the tamest things they wish to do to us. If it was legal to do so, women would form death squads and hunt sub5 virgin men for sport
Gives the same vibe as "Guys is my dad an incel???"
Gives the same vibe as "Guys is my dad an incel???"
Of course. Although, I'd say they'd have other men do it VS themselves doing it.
More sexhavers have killed women than incels have and ever will even when adjusting for population differences.
Redditors have always been retarded
Second reply is just a hiveminded feminist.
We're not violent being behind computer screens rotting 24/7.
Idiot.
We're not violent being behind computer screens rotting 24/7.
Idiot.
M
Incel means “involuntary celibate”, but not every man that is involuntarily single is an incel.
?
You can't make this up. Jfl.
Also always funny how they view someone like me who is hiding from the world that abused me a threat. My existence and vents on some forum they don't even have to read is not comparable to bullying I endured from the likes of them.
They are so pissed off that we are able to criticise them freely here since they are used to us being punching bags irl.
?
You can't make this up. Jfl.
Also always funny how they view someone like me who is hiding from the world that abused me a threat. My existence and vents on some forum they don't even have to read is not comparable to bullying I endured from the likes of them.
They are so pissed off that we are able to criticise them freely here since they are used to us being punching bags irl.
who do u think is gonna do the domestic abuse, an incel that has never had a gf, or a jock that has cheated like 5 times
They'd rather get their information from biased troon reddit than actually researching about the topic themselves. They'd rather get their definition of an incel from people who can't agree on what it is. They literally get stunlocked by this and the definition of 'woman'. What a bunch of freakoid natured mentally illed dykes.
Don't forget the most overused word of the past decade, "fascist."
<Dating
<Incel
Foids are fucking braindead.
Cope, virgin but not incel copers are still incels.
If a fool persists in his folly, he will become wise.
Sure, the foid in question has no idea what an incel is, but at least she accepts this, admits her ignorance, and seeks guidance to learn, rather than continue to parrot blatantly false information when proven wrong as r*dditors are wont to do.
She’s actually leagues smarter than any other r*dditor since she can actually admit when she’s ignorant and try to learn new information. Of course, the problem is that she went to the internet equivalent of the short bus to ask for answers, so she isn’t all that smart.
The really tragic part is that if she had gone… nearly anywhere than r*ddit to ask her question, she would know exactly what an incel is and emerge smarter for it. This is a prime example of crabs in a bucket dragging each other down.
If Obama’s “wife” big Mike really is a man, this isn’t a ridiculous statement.
This is a beautiful example of how midwits often end up being dumber than people with lower IQs (henceforth called nitwits)
There you have it. Beautiful. What a concise and accurate description. Both the nitwit and the genius would give you this answer. It’s factually correct, and it takes 2 seconds to read.
But the midwit can’t have a simple answer, because they don’t understand the value of brevity (this is also why midwits can never be funny) the midwit, in an effort to appear smarter than they actually are, must constantly over explain and overcomplicate even the most basic of topics. None of the nonsense that they add to a conversation is ever actually meaningful, they’re simply spewing word vomit in an attempt to seem smarter than they really are. In doing so they try to prove that they have a deep and complex understanding of the subject (unlike the foolish nitwit!) but actually show the complete opposite.
Ehhhh, technically this is true, since a man could have had prior relationships, or he could have one night stands, which would disqualify him as an incel while still technically make him involuntarily single if he struggles to find a long term relationship specifically. However, the mere fact that I have to explain and justify these technicalities is proof that the sentence is wholly unnecessary and serves only to complicate and confuse the answer. Notice also the switch to “involuntarily single” this isn’t pedantry or semantics, the words single and celibate do overlap, but in this specific context, celibate’s exact definition is important, and you can’t just swap it out for any other synonym. This shows that this r*dditor likely doesn’t even know what “celibate” means, if he thinks “single” is a good substitute here.
Incel communities exist, however, inceldom as a whole is not a “community” this is as ridiculous as saying that short men are a “community” communities about, for and by short men exist, yes, but not all short men are part of these communities.
The existence of bluepilled incels and incels who attempt to ascend by becoming feminist simps disproves this, obviously.
Technically true, but dishonestly framed, the vast majority of humans “can be dangerous” this is an entirely meaningless phrase.
Yes, of course. There will be violent members of any group. However, statistically (per capita) incels are among the least violent groups of people. Niggers, for example, are orders of magnitude more violent and dangerous than the average incel.
As you can see, the longer the midwit speaks for, the more he reveals his complete lack of any sort of understanding in the relevant subject matter. The nitwit, also has no deeper understanding of the subject matter and concepts he’s presented with, but the difference between the two is that the nitwit doesn’t pretend to have a deeper understanding. The nitwit accepts “incel means involuntary celibate” he takes this simple definition at face value and doesn’t attempt to invent ridiculous information to show how well he understands something which he actually knows NOTHING about. Every sentence in this comment after the first is either blatantly untrue, or completely unnecessary to the point, and only serves to reveal the midwits stupidity.
Tl;dr: the mark of a midwit is being able to remove 90% of their points from an argument, and having the argument stay the same, or even improve as a result.
Yes, the "incel community". Retarded foids
Self-research is actually what got me here.
If you're being intellectually honest with yourself, you will eventually be blackpilled.
As I once considered for an avi:
The bluepill is ignorance.
The redpill is fraud.
The blackpill is truth.
srs talk if they unironically think that even a model lib like obama is a nasty inkweller just because he vented about his romantic struggles as a male once or twice in his past, how much left that cannot be branded by that term? holes and gigachads only maybe? over for incelcels
Last edited:
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
