|A|:
Kontext based thinking is always better than meticulous thinking, since Kontext is responsibble for the value of a argument, meticulousness, makes you ignore it and concentrate on very-low value details
|B|:
theres always a case of either a quantitative mix or qualitative mix:
quantitative mix:
for example:
black and white:
black and white stripes
qualitative mix:
for example:
black and white:
gray
If you want to prevent a situation of a qualitative mix, you have it easier since you can either change the input or the process and if you want to prevent a case of a quantitative mix, you can only change the input
|C|:
If you want to know fast if something is good, you can look at it in the extreme case, so its easier to judge, but you can extremise it only to that point, where it doesnt change its core properties.
|D|:
Long term- based arguments are not always stronger than short term- based arguements, because:
A short term-decision can cause by butterfly effect a long term adventage, especially when its exponential and its the case when its the opposite of a vicious circle
|E|:
Good reasoning doesnt only depend on tactics I gave you and IQ but also on data you can process, your brains energy level (how much you have slept), your brains effectivity ( how interested you are,if you have ADHD), how much time you spend thinking about it
Kontext based thinking is always better than meticulous thinking, since Kontext is responsibble for the value of a argument, meticulousness, makes you ignore it and concentrate on very-low value details
|B|:
theres always a case of either a quantitative mix or qualitative mix:
quantitative mix:
for example:
black and white:
black and white stripes
qualitative mix:
for example:
black and white:
gray
If you want to prevent a situation of a qualitative mix, you have it easier since you can either change the input or the process and if you want to prevent a case of a quantitative mix, you can only change the input
|C|:
If you want to know fast if something is good, you can look at it in the extreme case, so its easier to judge, but you can extremise it only to that point, where it doesnt change its core properties.
|D|:
Long term- based arguments are not always stronger than short term- based arguements, because:
A short term-decision can cause by butterfly effect a long term adventage, especially when its exponential and its the case when its the opposite of a vicious circle
|E|:
Good reasoning doesnt only depend on tactics I gave you and IQ but also on data you can process, your brains energy level (how much you have slept), your brains effectivity ( how interested you are,if you have ADHD), how much time you spend thinking about it
Last edited:
