Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Cope Latinx countries are hopeless

every morning i wake up glad that i wasn't born in latin america. What the fuck is wrong with those countries? I swear like 99% of gore videos come from them, shit is crazy down there with the cartels and everything
 
I always dreamed of being a drug cartel boss. That has to be the peak life
 
every morning i wake up glad that i wasn't born in latin america. What the fuck is wrong with those countries? I swear like 99% of gore videos come from them, shit is crazy down there with the cartels and everything
Why caring about other's life when yours is shit in another way?
 
"but light-skinned hispanics are superior saar"
 
The 2024 Mexican election was one of deadliest ones
 

Brutal spic moment
 
They also have the highest troon rates in the world.
 
He was one of the biggest drug lords of all time and all people remember him for is being manlet
Its the Napoleon thingy

Even though he was tall for his time

He wasn't much taller, and thus not remembered for it. And he's demoted to manletism even though he was not.
 
They also have the highest troon rates in the world.
1747176635138


For such shitholes (no offense spiccels), they seem to care about a lot of shit like feminism and trooning out.

Imaging caring about becoming a tranny when your life is under the risk everyday, being shot by some guy in a flip flops on a bike or being the next "actor" in some cartel video.
 
Brazil is even worse because the cartels here are composed by literal monkeys with negative IQ
They kill you for anything
 
All destabilized by US imperialism
Partially. I think race mixing was what destroyed them.

Brazil itself had forced miscegenation by the Portuguese

From Wikipedia: Portuguese colonies encouraged mixed marriages to integrate populations, notably seen in Brazil and other territories, resulting in diverse, multicultural societies.

This issue is made worse by importing of niggers
 
But i still prefer this than to being indian
 
Partially. I think race mixing was what destroyed them.

Brazil itself had forced miscegenation by the Portuguese

From Wikipedia: Portuguese colonies encouraged mixed marriages to integrate populations, notably seen in Brazil and other territories, resulting in diverse, multicultural societies.

This issue is made worse by importing of niggers
What racemixing have to do with this lol
 
What racemixing have to do with this lol
Race mixing destroy people. People evolved in their lands for thousands of years, and introducing foreign blood will cause mismatch with the land characteristics. E.g. Tibetians have evolved high lung capacity due to high altitude, but if you thrown in say, people from flatland into the genetic pool, the next generation would struggle to breathe.

Culturally speaking...
The lack of a organic culture/identity.

The best and most effective way to unite people is through their race which cannot be changed, homogenous societies have higher social trust in general.

If that is not possible, there is the cultural/state identity, e.g. Singapore. Usually these countries have a limited pool of mixtures to choose from, e.g. Singapore only have Indians, Malays, Chinese. In a twisted sense, multi-ethnonationalism can work (think ethonationalism but for multiple DESIGNATED groups)

Next is religion identity, which can be seen in Middle East. Religions are highly vulnerable to corruption/interpretation of the text, forming blocs/sects, that produces some of the most brutal rivalry still see today, such as Shia vs Sunni.

Finally....

Despite the iberians' strong Catholic views, it failed to prevent mass degeneration of the Latin countries (including crimes). Because these countries lack what is needed to organize the people.
 
I've got nothing against mixed people; it is not their fault that they were born by sickos, usually with beastiality fetish.

On a statistical level, mixed race majority countries tend to perform less well economically.

One can look at Kazakhstan and Latin America. Homogeneous society is not a guarantee for prosperity, but it seems to be the requirement. There is not a single well off mixed majority country.
 
I've got nothing against mixed people; it is not their fault that they were born by sickos, usually with beastiality fetish.

On a statistical level, mixed race majority countries tend to perform less well economically.

One can look at Kazakhstan and Latin America. Homogeneous society is not a guarantee for prosperity, but it seems to be the requirement. There is not a single well off mixed majority country.
Map_of_the_racial_composition_of_populations_by_country_according_to_the_majority.png
 
Race mixing destroy people. People evolved in their lands for thousands of years, and introducing foreign blood will cause mismatch with the land characteristics. E.g. Tibetians have evolved high lung capacity due to high altitude, but if you thrown in say, people from flatland into the genetic pool, the next generation would struggle to breathe.

Culturally speaking...
The lack of a organic culture/identity.

The best and most effective way to unite people is through their race which cannot be changed, homogenous societies have higher social trust in general.

If that is not possible, there is the cultural/state identity, e.g. Singapore. Usually these countries have a limited pool of mixtures to choose from, e.g. Singapore only have Indians, Malays, Chinese. In a twisted sense, multi-ethnonationalism can work (think ethonationalism but for multiple DESIGNATED groups)

Next is religion identity, which can be seen in Middle East. Religions are highly vulnerable to corruption/interpretation of the text, forming blocs/sects, that produces some of the most brutal rivalry still see today, such as Shia vs Sunni.

Finally....

Despite the iberians' strong Catholic views, it failed to prevent mass degeneration of the Latin countries (including crimes). Because these countries lack what is needed to organize the people.
 
Race mixing destroy people. People evolved in their lands for thousands of years, and introducing foreign blood will cause mismatch with the land characteristics. E.g. Tibetians have evolved high lung capacity due to high altitude, but if you thrown in say, people from flatland into the genetic pool, the next generation would struggle to breathe.

Culturally speaking...
The lack of a organic culture/identity.

The best and most effective way to unite people is through their race which cannot be changed, homogenous societies have higher social trust in general.

If that is not possible, there is the cultural/state identity, e.g. Singapore. Usually these countries have a limited pool of mixtures to choose from, e.g. Singapore only have Indians, Malays, Chinese. In a twisted sense, multi-ethnonationalism can work (think ethonationalism but for multiple DESIGNATED groups)

Next is religion identity, which can be seen in Middle East. Religions are highly vulnerable to corruption/interpretation of the text, forming blocs/sects, that produces some of the most brutal rivalry still see today, such as Shia vs Sunni.

Finally....

Despite the iberians' strong Catholic views, it failed to prevent mass degeneration of the Latin countries (including crimes). Because these countries lack what is needed to organize the people.
So Much Bullshit
Race mixing causing lack of cultural identity?
The region with the most cultural identity in Brazil is the northeast, the most mixed region
And its also the most violent region, which shows that cultural identity doesnt affect shit.
 
I've got nothing against mixed people; it is not their fault that they were born by sickos, usually with beastiality fetish.

On a statistical level, mixed race majority countries tend to perform less well economically.

One can look at Kazakhstan and Latin America. Homogeneous society is not a guarantee for prosperity, but it seems to be the requirement. There is not a single well off mixed majority country.
Countries with mixed-race people perform less economically for historical reasons, not genetic reasons
 
So Much Bullshit
Race mixing causing lack of cultural identity?
The region with the most cultural identity in Brazil is the northeast, the most mixed region
And its also the most violent region, which shows that cultural identity doesnt affect shit.
Culturally/ethnically homogenous is not a guarantee for peace/prosperity, but it is an requirement. Japan's success is largely due to its homogenous high trust society. Again, for a country to be prosperous, there are multiple reasons, never a single one.
 
He was one of the biggest drug lords of all time and all people remember him for is being manlet
No, they remember him for being one of the biggest drug lords of all time and being a prison escape artist
 
Not more hopeless than the shithole you and I are from
 
Latin America is the worst of both worlds: the violence and poverty of a developing nation combined with the progressive mores of a developed one.
 
Latin America is the worst of both worlds: the violence and poverty of a developing nation combined with the progressive mores of a developed one.
WEF wet dream
 
Latin America is the worst of both worlds: the violence and poverty of a developing nation combined with the progressive mores of a developed one.
Interesting

So what would happen if they had the mores of a developing nation
 
Less feminism, less lgbt nonsense, reduced welfare due to higher dependence on family, etc.
ah yea. so latin countries are developing with violence also while having feminism and that stuff lol
 

Similar threads

WiZardTheGrAY
Replies
6
Views
516
BrazilianTrvecel
BrazilianTrvecel
Adûnâi
Replies
0
Views
95
Adûnâi
Adûnâi
Sans
Replies
51
Views
2K
adharmi
adharmi
Shaktiman
Replies
11
Views
868
blackraven
blackraven

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top