why was everyone saying logan would have wrecked KSI?
He was taller, more muscular, and had longer arms. If he knew what he was doing he could've tried standing from afar and cherry tapping KSI, maybe.
I'm already raging enough thinking of how much money they made doing this shit.
How many parents credit cards were used?
Not as much money as they'll make on the inevitable rematch, I bet. This YouTube thing is a cash cow if you can get one.
Anyone over the age of 15 has an opinion on this?
I wanted both Paul brothers to lose because they're every Chad tenet that we hate/submit to around here, made flesh. Horrible people, but shower game is on such levels that they can just be assholes and parents will let their kids follow them as career examples. They challenged KSI because KSI was getting something going with this "YouTube boxing" thing, and the Brothers Paul just decided they wanted to take from KSI, because they enjoy things more when they can take them from people.
I don't know what to call a draw. Logan didn't win, but neither did KSI, really? He maintains the defense of his title. I dunno if this is even real. But it feels good that the Paul brothers didn't get to take this.
I'm to old to follow youtubers closely enough, but I though KSI has soe previous fight experience?
Yes, he kinda started this YouTube boxing thing. And he trained at Floyd Mayweather Jr.'s camp. I think it was Mayweather who taught him how to tank shots in the first few rounds. And I'm pretty sure that's why KSI didn't lose. But Logan was in some stunning shape, physically. Maybe KSI should've stepped it up in that regard. But some people were saying "No, Logan is TOO muscular, his body needs more oxygen than he can reliably provide in this fight. He's getting exhausted. It's the LESS muscular boxer that carries the match!"
