Kill All Men is not a trend.

[bluepill_spokesman]

Hypergamy isn't a trend, it's how humans have always been. It's worse today than it has been historically, but hypergamy is a necessary consequence of unequal gamete costs in an animal species.

In the same way as hypergamy is not a trend, neither do toilets say "Kill all men" because they saw it on tiktok. They say it because it is a part of the natural order. In historic times, there was no law enforcement system. There were no consequences for the male who was the strongest, almost no matter what he did.

Low-quality males used to be violently culled. The biology inside women is used to there being more chads around. The weakest of our males are kept alive and free from violence. When a foid says "kill all men", it is her system rebelling against the presence of average men in the way she evolved to recognize. The female system is not in homeostasis without the murder of low-tier males and this is a biological fact.

 

[Deleted Member 8090]

Idk this making me sad why ppl die ?

 

[Poopless One]

Interesting

 

[bluepill_spokesman]

By that logic, saying rape all women isn't a trend. Men are just responding to the biological instincts that we evolved to recognise.

Yes. Maybe more precisely than I said in OP, I believe that the majority of the "kill all men" results from internal state and doesn't magically appear from watching a tiktok. Them seeing other toilets making the posts may just reduce the filtering layer, not the deep opinion layer.

And I would apply the same logic to "rape all women". It is a thing that incels say when they are not in homeostasis and when their emotional state and sharing environment (.is) allows it.

 

[bluepill_spokesman]

By that logic, saying rape all women isn't a trend. Men are just responding to the biological instincts that we evolved to recognise.

BTW I read your goodbye post and shed a tear for it lol, thought you were ending it so I'm glad to still see that you're around

 

[bluepill_spokesman]

Thanks mang

It was a brutal read and relatable at many places. Hope you're okay today.

 

[Homegrownman326]

Hypergamy isn't a trend, it's how humans have always been. It's worse today than it has been historically, but hypergamy is a necessary consequence of unequal gamete costs in an animal species.

In the same way as hypergamy is not a trend, neither do toilets say "Kill all men" because they saw it on tiktok. They say it because it is a part of the natural order. In historic times, there was no law enforcement system. There were no consequences for the male who was the strongest, almost no matter what he did.

Low-quality males used to be violently culled. The biology inside women is used to there being more chads around. The weakest of our males are kept alive and free from violence. When a foid says "kill all men", it is her system rebelling against the presence of average men in the way she evolved to recognize. The female system is not in homeostasis without the murder of low-tier males and this is a biological fact.

Very well put, this needs to be pinned. 100% factual. As you said, women absolutely despise non-Chads and want them dead. The mere presence of them is telling her biology that she can be raped and impregnated with low-quality genes, which is a massive cost due to gamete production inequalities, as you said. You don't see men being concerned with ugly women, women, on the other hand absoltutely loathe "incel" men.

 

[bluepill_spokesman]

Very well put, this needs to be pinned. 100% factual. As you said, women absolutely despise non-Chads and want them dead. The mere presence of them is telling her biology that she can be raped and impregnated with low-quality genes, which is a massive cost due to gamete production inequalities, as you said. You don't see men being concerned with ugly women, women, on the other hand absoltutely loathe "incel" men.

Thank you. It all comes down to anisogamy. I think it follows from the premises that there is at some level an internal want for women to see incels maimed or at least that their presence is reduced.

I agree. To a foid, a non-chad is an infringement upon her existence. On an evolutionary level, every "creepy" ethnic approaching them is a risk of rape and being given low-tier babies. The hatred is not exaggerated, it's evolved. It is structural.

 

[Homegrownman326]

Thank you. It all comes down to anisogamy. I think it follows from the premises that there is at some level an internal want for women to see incels maimed or at least that their presence is reduced.

I agree. To a foid, a non-chad is an infringement upon her existence. On an evolutionary level, every "creepy" ethnic approaching them is a risk of rape and being given low-tier babies. The hatred is not exaggerated, it's evolved. It is structural.

If these inferior men are to exist, in their eyes, they exist solely to serve them in some way. They have to be socially and ideologically neutered. These men in their eyes will be their betabux backup plans if Chadrone doesn't work out. The reason women screech about the red pill so much is that it not only threatens their dual mating strategy backup plan. It also threatens to activate this cohort of men, so they demand emancipation from an oppressive social contract. You don't see people fixated on feminism as much in our circles. At first glance, you might say that's not true, but hear me out. When we speak of feminism, we're discussing a political and social institution that has significant power and leverage over material outcomes. Our ideologies have no such power whatsoever. These foids get so fixated on every word that comes out of our mouths because it's a direct threat to their social leverage over us, and that strikes real fear into them. A bunch of losers in basements posting on small forums in the corners of the internet is enough to have videos made by foids screeching about how our mere words need to be made illegal. They hate our existence no matter what, and they're wired too. You cannot reason with the unreasonable.

 

[bluepill_spokesman]

If these inferior men are to exist, in their eyes, they exist solely to serve them in some way. They have to be socially and ideologically neutered. These men in their eyes will be their betabux backup plans if Chadrone doesn't work out. The reason women screech about the red pill so much is that it not only threatens their dual mating strategy backup plan. It also threatens to activate this cohort of men, so they demand emancipation from an oppressive social contract. You don't see people fixated on feminism as much in our circles. At first glance, you might say that's not true, but hear me out. When we speak of feminism, we're discussing a political and social institution that has significant power and leverage over material outcomes. Our ideologies have no such power whatsoever. These foids get so fixated on every word that comes out of our mouths because it's a direct threat to their social leverage over us, and that strikes real fear into them. A bunch of losers in basements posting on small forums in the corners of the internet is enough to have videos made by foids screeching about how our mere words need to be made illegal. They hate our existence no matter what, and they're wired too. You cannot reason with the unreasonable.

In evolved psychology, it is unsettling to a woman that a man that does not have the power and status gets group leverage. This is why, for example, you'll see them saying that "old white men" shouldn't be deciding their abortion rights. The argument is about the local chad who breeds them VS the old, creepy, unattractive and vaguely right-wing=bad man somewhere in a room. It is not about policy or even morality.

I don't know that I would go so far as to say that they fear redpill talking points percolating in global politics. I don't think toilets are intelligent enough to plan like that when they have emotional skin in the game. I think it's because their brain processes it as an analog to disturbance of the natural order of hypergamy. I think you're right that they perceive it as a threat to social leverage, but not on any systems-level. It's that their brains recognize a pattern that was unfavorable in tribes on the savanna.

Foids are allergic to redpill talking points not because they intellectually think that redpillers are taking over the world but because it threatens their "me want chad" system which must be kept online at all costs.

Don't ask questions, incel, and you deserve to be put to death for your opinions because you are irritating my right to peacefully enjoy being part of chad's harem.

 

[Homegrownman326]

In evolved psychology, it is unsettling to a woman that a man that does not have the power and status gets group leverage. This is why, for example, you'll see them saying that "old white men" shouldn't be deciding their abortion rights. The argument is about the local chad who breeds them VS the old, creepy, unattractive and vaguely right-wing=bad man somewhere in a room. It is not about policy or even morality.

I don't know that I would go so far as to say that they fear redpill talking points percolating in global politics. I don't think toilets are intelligent enough to plan like that when they have emotional skin in the game. I think it's because their brain processes it as an analog to disturbance of the natural order of hypergamy. I think you're right that they perceive it as a threat to social leverage, but not on any systems-level. It's that their brains recognize a pattern that was unfavorable in tribes on the savanna.

Foids are allergic to redpill talking points not because they intellectually think that redpillers are taking over the world but because it threatens their "me want chad" system which must be kept online at all costs.

Don't ask questions, incel, and you deserve to be put to death for your opinions because you are irritating my right to peacefully enjoy being part of chad's harem.

They fear the red pill because it threatens social stability. It's not an organized political upheaval but rather men dropping out of the work force, being politically dissadent, and having fewer betabux orbiters. These things will still have political ramifications, but not in any organized fashion. That's what I was saying.

 

[lifesucksandyoudie]

Women dying is not our problem. Never care about the suffering of others who have no sympathy for you. Don't have empathy for those who have zero empathy for you. In fact, low quality females being culled is a good thing so they don't try to taint the gene pool since they're allowed to get away with trying to cheat their genetics far more than men do, it's why you see ugly girls get more attention than ugly men on dating sites via juggernaut law. Without ugly women, ugly men (incels) wouldn't exist without their perquisite incel factories. If they wanted to get rid of incels they should start by eliminating themselves.

 

[bluepill_spokesman]

They fear the red pill because it threatens social stability. It's not an organized political upheaval but rather men dropping out of the work force, being politically dissadent, and having fewer betabux orbiters. These things will still have political ramifications, but not in any organized fashion. That's what I was saying.

I agree. I was just saying that foids aren't thinking on a systems level, only on a feelings chad vs chud level.

you see ugly girls get more attention than ugly men on dating sites

You discovered hypergamy.


>ugly men (incels) wouldn't exist without their perquisite incel factories

It's not a sensible hypothetical. And even if only stacies bred, there would still be incels because inceldom is partially bounded to the standards of those around you. Poor development and poor variation would also occur.

 

[MajorThomas666]

Hypergamy isn't a trend, it's how humans have always been. It's worse today than it has been historically, but hypergamy is a necessary consequence of unequal gamete costs in an animal species.

In the same way as hypergamy is not a trend, neither do toilets say "Kill all men" because they saw it on tiktok. They say it because it is a part of the natural order. In historic times, there was no law enforcement system. There were no consequences for the male who was the strongest, almost no matter what he did.

Low-quality males used to be violently culled. The biology inside women is used to there being more chads around. The weakest of our males are kept alive and free from violence. When a foid says "kill all men", it is her system rebelling against the presence of average men in the way she evolved to recognize. The female system is not in homeostasis without the murder of low-tier males and this is a biological fact.

Well in that case:


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Tnd5bCytvCA

 

[bluepill_spokesman]

Well in that case:

Sure, let's go for it

 

[GloomyGhoul]

By that logic, saying rape all women isn't a trend. Men are just responding to the biological instincts that we evolved to recognise.

Now that would be a slogan I can get behind

 

[160cmbloop]

all men = subhumans

not chad

 

[Sir Silentium]

Well in that case:


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Tnd5bCytvCA

I'm addicted to his videos