Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Keep talking about me, faggots

You saying I deserve inceldom because I like pussy? You are straight up gay
Liking pussy is gay if anything since there's male DNA on it & the clitoris is a underdeveloped penis.
 
Peak zoomed brainrot,
yes :yes:
Leroy

people like you are why shit keeps on getting worse including this site
I dont do this often tbh, i just do it to certain fags like regenerator and rapistcel
 
You didn't even address the two points I made.
I don't need to address anything you say moron. I don't owe you shit. You just said that liking pussy is gay. That's the kind of statement made by someone who's completely out of touch with reality. Liking pussy is the literal definition of heterosexuality.
 
he's explaining used-up ones are gay due to them having male DNA
He's literally talking about all vaginas. He called the clit an "underdeveloped penis" jfl
 
Regenerator isn't a fag, look at this:


he's explaining used-up ones are gay due to them having male DNA



Home

Health

Women Retain DNA From Every Man They Have Sex With
Health

Women Retain DNA From Every Man They Have Sex With​

Don Patrick December 22, 2023
Results of a new study by the University of Seattle and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center suggest that women retain and carry the living DNA from every man with whom they have had sexual intercourse with. For some, that’s a lot of DNA.
This startling information was discovered unintentionally whilst researchers were attempting to determine if women who had been pregnant with a son might be more predisposed to specific neurological diseases.
The study took a turn when researchers began to realize the complexity of the female brain.
According to the study, female brains have been found to harbor “male microchimerism”, meaning that the presence of male DNA is genetically different from the rest of the cells that make up the woman.
microchimerism

“63% of the females (37 of 59) tested harbored male microchimerism in the brain. Male microchimerism was present in multiple brain regions,” according to the study.
So…where did these cells come from?
Researchers first hypothesized the cells could stem from her father’s DNA, though this isn’t possible as his DNA combines with the mother’s to create a child’s unique DNA.
Their second hypothesis was that the DNA might be remnants of a pregnancy. Though, this was later debunked by the presence of male DNA of a female brain who had never been pregnant.
In an effort to gain a better understanding of their results before releasing information to the public, scientists buried their findings in several sub-studies and articles, but an analytical review of their investigation clearly shows where the presence of male DNA cells in the female brain stem from.
“CONCLUSIONS: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women.”
The following are possible sources of the male DNA living in women’s brains, according to the scientists:
  1. unknown abortions
  2. a male twin that vanishes
  3. an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation
  4. sexual intercourse
Given the fact that 63% of women have male DNA living in their brain, the first three possible sources would only apply to a small percentage of women and could not possibly make up the 63%. This leaves the fourth option, which is more common.
Hence, we can statistically infer that the source of male DNA in the female brain is sexual intercourse.
This means that a woman absorbs and retains spermatozoa from every male partner she has sexual intercourse with. Scientists supported this finding with the results of autopsies in elderly female women that revealed some had been carrying male DNA in their brains for more than 50 years.
Sperm are living cells. When it injected into you, it swims around until it crashes into a wall, attached and burrows itself into the flesh. If it injected into your mouth, it travels to your nasal passages, inner ear, and behind your eyes. Next, it enters your bloodstream and collects in the brain and spine.
This sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie, as the sperm becomes a part of you and there’s no getting rid of it. This is just the beginning of truly understanding the full power and effects of sexual intercourse.
Ladies, if you don’t want their DNA, don’t do it!
If you found this article interesting, please share with friends and family by clicking the button below!
 
I don't need to address anything you say moron. I don't owe you shit. You just said that liking pussy is gay. That's the kind of statement made by someone who's completely out of touch with reality. Liking pussy is the literal definition of heterosexuality.
You lose the argument then retard.
 
Nigga read what he said
Yeah he said a bunch of bullshit
Pussy is pussy, idc what he gotta say abt it

Jfl at the state of .IS in 2025 where liking pussy turns you into a faggot :feelskek:
 
In this way it does:
Yeah but it's still less gay than liking dicks obviously. Every biological man naturally likes pussy, the less used up the better of course
 
Yeah but it's still less gay than liking dicks obviously. Every biological man naturally likes pussy, the less used up the better of course
ofc
Yeah he said a bunch of bullshit
So this is bullshit?



Pussy is pussy, idc what he gotta say abt it
Oh yeah, even if ran through & used-up like arbys sandwiches jfl
Jfl at the state of .IS in 2025 where liking pussy turns you into a faggot :feelskek:
Jfl at your logic
 
I don't need to address anything you say moron. I don't owe you shit. You just said that liking pussy is gay. That's the kind of statement made by someone who's completely out of touch with reality. Liking pussy is the literal definition of heterosexuality.
You are a fucking foid worshipper
 
Oh yeah, even if ran through & used-up like arbys sandwiches jfl
Well, beggars can't be chosers unless you can get away with graping...yk....
I can't talk about it
 
Peak zoomed brainrot, people like you are why shit keeps on getting worse including this site
By the way this dude types it was always so hard to see him actually being old enough to be here.
 
Regenerator isn't a fag, look at this:


he's explaining used-up ones are gay due to them having male DNA
Yeah, and he is syaing that vaginas are underdeveloped penises.

No idea, but it is just the way it is. I still like vrigin pussy. Coomfuel imo.
 
New race war unlocked
 
Yeah, and he is syaing that vaginas are underdeveloped penises.

No idea, but it is just the way it is. I still like vrigin pussy. Coomfuel imo.
virgin pussy is ok, but idk what he means with "underdeveloped penises"

@Regenerator ok the male DNA/ran through with other dicks part makes sense but come on now :feelskek:
 
I have been saying this for YEARS. People kept calling me crazy.

Fuck all the cumguzzling whores. Desgusting hubrid factories.
 
The Neon Nettle article cites a study led by Chan titled, “Male Microchimerism in the Human Female Brain, opens new tab” published in 2012. Microchimerism, opens new tab refers to the presence of cells in an individual that are from another individual. The authors note that the presence of male cells in women’s bodies is already established as being linked to prior pregnancies with a male fetus or transfer from a male sibling in utero, for example.
They describe male DNA found in the brains of women in their study as “most likely” from prior pregnancy with a male fetus and do not conclude or mention that women store DNA from males acquired through intercourse.
“In our study as well as others done prior, we merely speculate the establishment of microchimerism through intercourse,” Chan told Reuters. “That is, the possibility exists but it has not been tested (or proven, as the lay person may say).”
Dr. J. Lee Nelson, another author of the 2012 study, addressed the storage claim in a 2018 interview, opens new tab with Business Insider. “Any suggestion that male DNA is routinely retained from sexual partners has no support from any scientific study,” Nelson said, adding that while some studies mention the possibility, it has not been tested.

I read this and apparently the lead of the study cited in the original article said that the idea that women can retain DNA from men that they have sex with was pure speculation and that it has yet to be proven. Could maybe be true but as of now there is no concrete evidence behind it.
 
I have been saying this for YEARS. People kept calling me crazy.

Fuck all the cumguzzling whores. Desgusting hubrid factories.
Never appeal to popularity & always stand for what is right even if it means standing alone.
 
Even if it is an underdeveloped penis.

If you as a male don't find vaginas exciting theen something is wrong with you.

Maybe you're actually gay and orefer properly developed dicks.

I am not tying to hate on you, but get a grip, nigga.
 

Blackpill Study: Do Women Retain the DNA of Every Man They Sleep With?


Introduction


A long-standing claim in blackpill and manosphere communities is that women permanently retain the DNA of every man they have had sex with. This concept has been used to justify the idea that "used-up" women are biologically tainted, reinforcing beliefs about hypergamy, pair bonding, and the supposed superiority of virgin women. But is this claim scientifically valid, or is it a misinterpretation of research to fit an ideological narrative?


This study will examine scientific research, biological mechanisms, and the blackpill implications of DNA retention in women.




1. Understanding the DNA Retention Claim


The claim suggests that:


  1. Women store DNA from past sexual partners within their bodies, particularly in the brain.
  2. This DNA influences their future offspring, making cuckoldry inevitable.
  3. The presence of multiple male DNA fragments "taints" a woman, making her less desirable for long-term commitment.

This theory is primarily based on a study about microchimerism—a real but misunderstood biological phenomenon.




2. What is Microchimerism?


Microchimerism is a condition where foreign DNA cells persist in the body. It is commonly observed in:


  • Pregnancy: Women retain fetal DNA from their children.
  • Blood Transfusions & Organ Transplants: Recipients can carry donor DNA.
  • Twin Transfer: Some people retain DNA from a vanished twin in the womb.

The 2012 study that incel communities reference (Male Microchimerism in the Human Female Brain) found male DNA in the brains of 63% of tested women. However, this was NOT conclusively linked to sexual intercourse. The authors explicitly stated that pregnancy with a male fetus is the most likely explanation for the male DNA found in women.


Debunking the Myth:


  • There is NO direct evidence that sperm DNA permanently integrates into a woman’s body.
  • Studies do NOT confirm that DNA from sexual partners alters female biology in any way.
  • Most cases of male DNA in women are linked to pregnancy, not sex.



3. The "Sperm Storage" Argument: Can a Woman's Body Hold Male DNA?


Many manosphere figures argue that sperm can permanently embed itself in a woman’s body and brain. While it’s true that sperm can linger for a short time, the body has defense mechanisms to remove it:


  • Sperm Survival in the Vagina: 1-5 days.
  • Sperm in the Uterus: Cleared out in a few days by the immune system.
  • DNA Absorption? No evidence suggests sperm DNA integrates into a woman's cells long-term.

Scientific Verdict:


  • Sperm does NOT permanently alter female genetics.
  • Even if small traces remain temporarily, they are destroyed by immune responses.
  • There is NO proof that sperm affects future offspring.



4. Implications for the Blackpill


✅ What’s True?


  • Women do carry male DNA, but mostly from pregnancies, not sex.
  • The more sexual partners a woman has, the higher chance she has been impregnated at some point (even without giving birth).
  • Female pair bonding might be real, but it is not because of DNA retention—rather, it’s due to oxytocin bonding and social conditioning.

❌ What’s False?


  • Women do NOT permanently store DNA from every man they sleep with.
  • A woman’s future child is NOT genetically affected by past sexual partners.
  • The idea of a "used-up woman being biologically tainted" is not backed by science.



5. The Final Truth


The belief that women "retain" the DNA of every man they’ve slept with is an exaggerated blackpill myth. The science of microchimerism is often twisted to fit an ideological agenda, but there is no real evidence that sexual activity fundamentally alters a woman’s DNA in the long term.


However, pair bonding and hypergamy remain valid concerns. Women with higher partner counts do tend to have weaker emotional connections, but this is due to psychological and behavioral reasons, not DNA.


Blackpill Takeaway:


  • Promiscuous women are less likely to bond strongly in relationships—but not because of DNA retention.
  • Virgin women may be more emotionally loyal, but not because of genetics.
  • The idea that women are permanently "contaminated" by sex is not scientifically valid, but they are psychologically shaped by their sexual past.

Final Verdict: Blackpill Status


PARTIALLY TRUE, BUT BIOLOGICALLY EXAGGERATED.


  • Microchimerism exists but is linked to pregnancy, not sex.
  • DNA retention does not biologically alter women’s future offspring.
  • Promiscuous women may be less loyal, but this is a psychological issue, not a genetic one.



Conclusion


While some elements of the blackpill claim hold weight—especially regarding female pair bonding—the biological argument that women permanently absorb and store male DNA through sex is a misrepresentation of real science. The blackpill is strongest when it sticks to real evolutionary psychology, not debunked pseudoscience.


Would you like me to refine this or expand on psychological effects instead?
 
Even if it is an underdeveloped penis.

If you as a male don't find vaginas exciting theen something is wrong with you.

Maybe you're actually gay and orefer properly developed dicks.

I am not tying to hate on you, but get a grip, nigga.
GkfYTKbW4AA5B4W


:feelskek:
 

Similar threads

Rapistcel
Replies
100
Views
2K
sexualeconomist
sexualeconomist
Rapistcel
Replies
10
Views
895
Rapistcel
Rapistcel
Rapistcel
Replies
12
Views
224
Rapistcel
Rapistcel
Stupid Clown
Replies
12
Views
1K
Runt171
Runt171
Rapistcel
Replies
17
Views
508
Rapistcel
Rapistcel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top