It’s ironic because statistics will be used for vaccines and global warming, but if it’s used for dating sites its unreliable.
It’s ironic because statistics will be used for vaccines and global warming, but if it’s used for dating sites its unreliable.
D
The hypocrisy is unreal.
M
Ye stupid inkwell, how dare you say that. I have seen 4'5 ft bald curry dating stacy. See your statistics are wrong
Doctors kill more people than cars and guns combined.
Women can do no wrong bro, they are innocent and not superficial bro, just be confident bro, just do ur hair and take a bath bro, they are loyal bro, just respect them bro
I wish I would found myself dead within my own car and a driver licence in some car accident.
You don't need a license if you don't own the car! ; ; )
But you still need to know to drive. Enough to go the wrong way...
If you do not have a driver licence as a grown up man, you can basically kill yourself.
It is over.
But what if poorcel?
At this point it is absollutely over.
Now you just destroyed my penis with that and you do not have to kill yourself.
I still cope
Statistics and data is what gives these little shits their vidya and everything else you can imagine in daily life.
Fucking brainlets
Fucking brainlets
OP 200 IQ for noticing this!!
We need the incel equivalent of Greta Thunberg to go out there and warn men they are being exterminated via Tinder eugenics.
Reminder: these people actually want to make us believe they're right.
First step: statistics don't count.
Also ignore every dating app aswell
Just ignore everythng bro including your advice moron
D
Couldn't be more true your words.
So even if I ignored the statistics and went outside or to a nightclub etc its still the same few fucking guys going around with the foids, shit never changes
Yeah, no. People who don't understand science usually don't believe in climate change because they are scientifically illerate.
It really is that simple.
All scientists don't agree, that the beauty is science, but the thing is scientists from different disciplines all see the effects of climate change. That is what makes the evidence so robust.
Someone who reads ice cores sees something, it's confirmed by geologists, and the the guy who reads tree rings sees it too. It isn't like one group of scientists say one thing and another say another thing, they all see the effects so the evidence is there of you care to try to understand it.
Or you can be an antiscience fucktard in which you should log off the internet because it was invented using the principles of science that you are denying.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
