Yes it's biology that women are seen as more valuable since they carry the offspring for the new generations, but that doesn't mean she should be immediately put on a pedestal just because she can birth kids.
How many women with recessed jawlines, shitty bloated faces, poor frames and heights, low IQ and mental illnesses get to reproduce with better looking men and create more ugly and autistic sons? By simply saying all women are valuable because "MUH BIOLOGY, you're basically saying that even the lowest of the low deserves to get impregnated by a man of her dreams just because she has a giant roast beef opening between their legs and I find that retarded. This is one of the reasons why hypergamy is at the all time high. Because men and the "equality" obsessed society can't see that most women also have genes that shouldn't be passed on, but since msot normie men are horny, desperate cucks who NEEED to pass on their genes, even if it results of the worst combination and man possible, they let themselves nut into another genetic defect, instead of letting her genes die off.
Who fucking cares that a woman could take 12 months to birth a one baby when that baby will be an incel or a section 8 bum with a criminal record?
"OOOOH BUT WOOMEN.. BUT WHIMINZ NEED TO SELECT THE BEST GENES FOR THEIR CHILD!"
It doesn't work you retard because your genes suck too. It's like mixing water with mud and excepting it to end up clean. You aren't gonna create a Chad from 4'9 height, shitty frame and recessed jawline, even with a chadlite. What you're gonna create is future .is users and r/short guys members. Even if you do, that'll probably be their younger sibling by pure luck and then what? You've created another excess male you're talking about because of your genes.
If this society was truly feminist, we would've seen both women's and men's genes as something which can both equally be worthless and garbage and be willing to throw even plenty of women off the gene pool, if it meant producing less offspring.
How many women with recessed jawlines, shitty bloated faces, poor frames and heights, low IQ and mental illnesses get to reproduce with better looking men and create more ugly and autistic sons? By simply saying all women are valuable because "MUH BIOLOGY, you're basically saying that even the lowest of the low deserves to get impregnated by a man of her dreams just because she has a giant roast beef opening between their legs and I find that retarded. This is one of the reasons why hypergamy is at the all time high. Because men and the "equality" obsessed society can't see that most women also have genes that shouldn't be passed on, but since msot normie men are horny, desperate cucks who NEEED to pass on their genes, even if it results of the worst combination and man possible, they let themselves nut into another genetic defect, instead of letting her genes die off.
Who fucking cares that a woman could take 12 months to birth a one baby when that baby will be an incel or a section 8 bum with a criminal record?
"OOOOH BUT WOOMEN.. BUT WHIMINZ NEED TO SELECT THE BEST GENES FOR THEIR CHILD!"
It doesn't work you retard because your genes suck too. It's like mixing water with mud and excepting it to end up clean. You aren't gonna create a Chad from 4'9 height, shitty frame and recessed jawline, even with a chadlite. What you're gonna create is future .is users and r/short guys members. Even if you do, that'll probably be their younger sibling by pure luck and then what? You've created another excess male you're talking about because of your genes.
If this society was truly feminist, we would've seen both women's and men's genes as something which can both equally be worthless and garbage and be willing to throw even plenty of women off the gene pool, if it meant producing less offspring.
