Eremetic
Neo Luddite • Unknown
-
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2023
- Posts
- 5,301
fucking dindu
South Indians don't hate Muslims, we hate North Indians irrespectiveyou nigger most of pakistan is muslim and you don't know me
Sorry, too busy hating on cow beltersjust hate 97 percent of people
North Indian muslimsand Muslims
muslim is muslim and it's a disrespect to jinnahNorth Indian muslims
True. Tamil Muslims contributed so muchsorry islam is still part of the nation
Ethnicity >> Religionmuslim is muslim and it's a disrespect to jinnah
its 50/50 for me that's why you see me making fun of hindus also because of irl experiencesEthnicity >> Religion
jflTrue. Tamil Muslims contributed so much
Same. But I like all Dravidians Christians, Muslims or Hindus. Hate all North Indians irrespective of religion.its 50/50 for me that's why you see me making fun of hindus also because of irl experiences
cherry picking lol the point was to show Pakistanis also are white the villager is a from northern Pakistan and the women olive skinnedThe examples he picked were shit. If you don't mogg them, sorry it's over for you
View attachment 1354262View attachment 1354263View attachment 1354264View attachment 1354265
Being fair skinned doesn't mean much tbh. It's more about being Caucasoid and having robust bones.cherry picking lol the point was to show Pakistanis also are white the villager is a from northern Pakistan and the women olive skinned
The Kalash show evidence of genetic connections to ancient northern Eurasian populations,The Chenchu are described as "typical ASI-shifted tribal people from South India," while the Kalash have "exclusive western Eurasian origin."Not much in this context. Chenchu tribe has more R1a than Kalash tribe, former looks fully Abo, latter is the whitest curry group
I mogg them. And from what I saw even average Paki mogg them
Look at who has more R1aThe Kalash show evidence of genetic connections to ancient northern Eurasian populations,The Chenchu are described as "typical ASI-shifted tribal people from South India," while the Kalash have "exclusive western Eurasian origin."
Exploring European ancestry among the Kalash population: a mitogenomic perspective - PMC
With a population of around 4 000 individuals, the Kalash people have been living in the Hindu-Kush mountain valleys of present-day northern Pakistan for centuries. Due to their mysterious origin and fairer European complexion, the genetic history ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Pakistanis have more caucasoid features than IndiansBeing fair skinned doesn't mean much tbh. It's more about being Caucasoid and having robust bones.
YeahPakistanis have more caucasoid features than Indians
im trying to explain to you why its different and there was no sample size given for kalash peopleLook at who has more R1a
The Pakistani population consists of mostly Indo-Aryans. Pakistanis are 70% Caucasoid, 20% Australoid- ......., and 10% Mongoloid in their overall genetic composition. Indians are 50% Australoid-....... by race, 35% Caucasoid, and 15% Mongoloid in their overall genetic composition.Yeah
im trying to explain to you why its different and there was no sample size given for kalash people
WrongThe Pakistani population consists of mostly Indo-Aryans. Pakistanis are 70% Caucasoid, 20% Australoid- ......., and 10% Mongoloid in their overall genetic composition. Indians are 50% Australoid-....... by race, 35% Caucasoid, and 15% Mongoloid in their overall genetic composition.
im rightWrong
*low sample size*List of R1a frequency by population - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
True. I don't place much trust on them, but both of them at least should have more or less the same R1a despite looking completely different.*low sample size*
Just be currynigger Midget theoryjust be @anandkonda is the final bp
i think kalash has more R1a which is consistent with strong the correlation but other factors matter as well jfl if i had madeinheaven and comrade spider i could use them as pawns for racewars whilst pushing pk propaganda im not hyper autistic enoughTrue. I don't place much trust on them, but both of them at least should have more or less the same R1a despite looking completely different.
So R1a doesn't mean anything. Autosomal and pheno does
Kalash would have lesser R1a because they have more female bias steppei think kalash has more R1a which is consistent with strong the correlation but other factors matter as well
That faggot was a jeetnigger LARPing as Arabcomrade spider
they have approximately 27-30% Steppe MLBA (Middle to Late Bronze Age) ancestry This substantial steppe component is not consistent with a predominantly female-biased steppe contribution.Kalash would have lesser R1a because they have more female bias steppe
That faggot was a jeetnigger LARPing as Arab
still anti hinduKalash would have lesser R1a because they have more female bias steppe
That faggot was a jeetnigger LARPing as Arab
Funniest part was when he said he'd have roped if he was born a Dravidian, despite him LARPing from slums of Bangalore all the timestill anti hindu
lolFunniest part was when he said he'd have roped if he was born a Dravidian, despite him LARPing from slums of Bangalore all the time
Tamils are only at most 50% AASI on average, rest is West Eurasians. Tamils are Abo + Caucasoid, same way how Turkics are Mongoloids + Caucasoidtamils are abo and they mog
yeah but they are less cauc than other IndiansTamils are only at most 50% AASI on average, rest is West Eurasians. Tamils are Abo + Caucasoid, same way how Turkics are Mongoloids + Caucasoid
True because higher AASI results in more robust faces.yeah but they are less cauc than other Indians
Built for BTC (BIG TAMIL COCK)
I'm not sure if this is an incel site anymore