Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Jeremy Meeks proves good looks are more essential to males

F

FaceIsLife

Recruit
★★
Joined
Nov 13, 2019
Posts
168
Has there ever been a female felon who got bailed out of jail by thirsty men; got a free luxury house in L.A. and multiple very lucrative modeling contracts; and finally got to marry some billionaire heir ?

As long as that answer is "no" I will always believe having good looks is more essential to men.

Men get huge advantages by being good looking.
Women get huge advantages by their willingness to go naked or fuck the right person; their looks itself have nothing to do with it. Lots of camgirls are ugly but they make thousands because of their willingness to go naked.


Out of those good looking female felons has there ever been one who turned out to become as successful as Jeremy Meeks ? Men surely didn't send them money or started to obsess over them.

45D3210B00000578-5031187-image-a-58_1509367529757.jpg


e11379b3906bc261d84cc67e74462f8e.jpg
 
Last edited:
Meeks mogs both of them badly imo, if there was a yasss slay felon that looksmatched Meeks she'd get the same or higher privilege.
 
Tbh a lot of cucks spend loads of money on women. That is the norm; most men go overboard to please women. The reason the Meekspill is brutal is because it shows that women value looks as much as men do which flies in the face of everything Soyciety wants us to believe. If anything, good looking men (by foid standards) are even rarer than good looking women (by male standards).
 
We will never have a felon gf with feline eyes
 
Female models earn more than males. The richest supermodel is worth like 360m
 
Meeks mogs both of them badly imo, if there was a yasss slay felon that looksmatched Meeks she'd get the same or higher privilege.

No I don't think so. Men aren't so obsessive towards a good looking female. They just look at the picture; think she's hot and maybe wank off and that's it.

Women on the other hand start to write letters; send money; follow them obsessively on social media and compare other males to that standard.
 
No I don't think so. Men aren't so obsessive towards a good looking female. They just look at the picture; think she's hot and maybe wank off and that's it.

Women on the other hand start to write letters; send money; follow them obsessively on social media and compare other males to that standard.

Thats not true. Men are quite obsessed over looks, the data on this is very clear. Most men would rather be with a good looking female regardless of her personality. The difference with women is really where they set the bar in terms of looks.
 
Tbh a lot of cucks spend loads of money on women. That is the norm; most men go overboard to please women. The reason the Meekspill is brutal is because it shows that women value looks as much as men do which flies in the face of everything Soyciety wants us to believe. If anything, good looking men (by foid standards) are even rarer than good looking women (by male standards).

True but like I said in my OP men send money to women based on their willingness to go naked and not because of their good looks.
Women on the other hand send money to men based on their good looks and not on their willingness to go naked.

And even if looks matter equally to both men and women; women would consider 80% of men below average (like you said) and men would consider 80% of women above average so we still lose.
Thats not true. Men are quite obsessed over looks, the data on this is very clear. Most men would rather be with a good looking female regardless of her personality. The difference with women is really where they set the bar in terms of looks.

Yes I agree I worded it badly.

Here is what I meant from another post:

"And even if looks matter equally to both men and women; women would consider 80% of men below average (like you said) and men would consider 80% of women above average so we still lose."

It's just that males have such a low standard for what should be considered a good looking female so that even an objectively ugly female is good looking to a lot of males; making it seem like looks don't matter to men while it still does. We just have shit standards.
 
Last edited:
And even if looks matter equally to both men and women; women would consider 80% of men below average (like you said) and men would consider 80% of women above average so we still lose.

Both sexes value looks. The difference is that women portray themselves as these kind accepting creatures who seek out men with great personalities when in reality they are extremely harsh and brutal in evaluating a man's looks. Men are much more forgiving compared to women in terms of how they evaluate the opposite sex lookswise.
 

Similar threads

INVERTER
Replies
4
Views
271
INVERTER
INVERTER
AsiaCel
Replies
22
Views
774
Yabadadabadoo
Yabadadabadoo
RobertGarnicasAPedo
Replies
25
Views
2K
Claudius the God
Claudius the God
Izayacel
Replies
39
Views
990
Izayacel
Izayacel
thejbird
Replies
4
Views
677
SubhumanOldcel
SubhumanOldcel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top