masterwizard
Commander
★★★★★
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2018
- Posts
- 3,398
As per the incel wikipedia edit/talk page 2018:
So lets see, the evidence level wikipedia requires is 4 news sources that regularly cite wikipedia for their claims, if they even bother to cite anything for their claims at all.
Lets investigate these sources:
1) Theweek.co.uk claims:
2) Washington Post - Uses a georgia university study from 2001, which looked at JUST 81 STUDENTS AT THE UNI WHO WERE INCEL. Is it such a fucking shock that most of these students were white, in a majority white university, in a majority white state?
3) Toronto City News:-
So its professor Judith Taylor now making this claim. Who is she? A woman and Gender studies Institute professor. Maybe she studies incels? Nope:-
Its the usual feminist gender studies nonsense, nothing at all to do with incels there. She probably assumes she is an expert because it falls under her purview has a gender studies quack.
4) NBC News - Ahh, at last. We find the final solution:
Its the SPLC boyos, who have of course classified incels as a hate group, along with everything that is pro white or pro male in any way.
Conclusion - Sorry to all the curries, ricecels, blackcels, arabcels out there on this board, you guys are just part of a tiny white minority. Your grievances about the racial imbalances of dating are invalidated and JBW is clearly false because a bunch of quacks, jews, hacks and low IQ nerds on wikipedia say so. Incels are a white movement after all.
I've re-added the claim that they're mostly white after seeing it was removed by The Anome. I've includedthreefour sources specifically for the whiteness claim:
- The Incel Movement has been identified as a strand of a broader trend of young white males being radicalised online. The Week
- "What makes the incel culture different is that these are primarily heterosexual white men..." (part of a quote attributed to Ross Haenfler, "associate professor of sociology at Grinnell College who studies subcultures and masculinity") Washington Post
- The term [incel] would soon be appropriated by groups of disaffected, young white males... CityNews
- "[Incels are] young, frustrated white males in their late teens into their early twenties who are having a hard time adjusting to adulthood." (part of a quote attributed to Heidi Beirich, the director of the Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Project) NBC News
So lets see, the evidence level wikipedia requires is 4 news sources that regularly cite wikipedia for their claims, if they even bother to cite anything for their claims at all.
Lets investigate these sources:
1) Theweek.co.uk claims:
There is ZERO SOURCING OR EVIDENCE for this claim. Its literally just the author making it up.Are they dangerous?
The Incel Movement has been identified as a strand of a broader trend of young white males being radicalised online. It shares some similarities with the better known alt-right movement, with both groups attributing society’s ills to social liberalism, women and ethnic minorities.
Feminism and social justice are blamed for supposedly upsetting the balance of the sexual marketplace in favour of women, while non-white races are frequently described in crude sexual stereotypes.
2) Washington Post - Uses a georgia university study from 2001, which looked at JUST 81 STUDENTS AT THE UNI WHO WERE INCEL. Is it such a fucking shock that most of these students were white, in a majority white university, in a majority white state?
3) Toronto City News:-
According to University of Toronto Sociology professor Judith Taylor, Incel was a group started by a young Canadian woman in 1993 for people who struggled to find acceptance in their social lives and often found themselves “involuntarily celibate.”
The term would soon be appropriated by groups of disaffected, young white males who often vented their frustrations on online forums.
“(They) used it as a mechanism for talking about their resentment and hatred,” Taylor told CityNews. “Their resentment against socially successful men, their resentment against women who were withholding sex…”
“It is mostly young white men between the ages of 19 and 30,” she adds. “This is a population that is anticipating a particular kind of social standing that real life isn’t offering them and they are looking for things to blame. These are also young men that have felt themselves victims of bullying and who haven’t reached the kind of success or popularity that they had hoped for.”
So its professor Judith Taylor now making this claim. Who is she? A woman and Gender studies Institute professor. Maybe she studies incels? Nope:-
Johnston, Josee and Judith Taylor. (2008). “Feminist Consumerism and Fat Activists Comparative Study of Grassroots Activism and the Dove ‘Real Beauty’ Campaign.” SIGNS 33(4): 941-966.
[Reprinted in Gender Frontiers 8th Edition (forthcoming) Edited by Laila Rupp, Verta Taylor and Nancy Whittier
Taylor, Judith and Patterson, Matt. “Autonomy and Compliance: How Sociologists Respond to Ethical Review”. Qualitative Sociology.33: 161-183.]
Taylor, Judith. (2008). Glass Houses: Saving Feminist Anti-Violence Agencies from Self Destruction, by Rebekkah Adams, Canadian Review of Sociology, on-line reviews.
Taylor, Judith. (2008). “ Imperfect Intimacies: The Problem with Women’s Sociality in Contemporary North American Feminist Memoir.” Gender & Society 22: 705-727.
Taylor, Judith. (2007). “Organizational Elaboration as Social Movement Tactic: Case Study of Social Movement Leadership in the first U.S. School-Sponsored Program for Gay and Lesbian Youth.” Social Movement Studies, 6(3): 311-326.
Taylor, Judith. (2009). “Rich Sensitivities: An Analysis of Cruelty Among Women in Feminist Memoir Projects. Canadian Journal of Sociology. 46 (2009): 123-141.
Taylor, Judith. (2006). “The Emotional Contradictions of Identity Politics: A Case Study of a Failed Human Relations Commission.” Sociological Perspectives 49:219-239.
Taylor, Judith. (2005). “Who Manages Feminist Inspired Reform? An In-Depth Look at Title IX Coordinators in the U.S.” Gender & Society 19(3): 358-375.
[Reprinted 2006 in The New Civil Rights Research: A Constitutive Approach. Edited by Benjamin
Fleury-Steiner and Laura Beth Nielsen. Ashgate: Burlington, VT: 37-54.]
Its the usual feminist gender studies nonsense, nothing at all to do with incels there. She probably assumes she is an expert because it falls under her purview has a gender studies quack.
4) NBC News - Ahh, at last. We find the final solution:
Heidi Beirich, the director of the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Intelligence Project, said that the incel community mostly consists of aggrieved young men, who have found a natural home on 4chan and darker parts of Reddit.
“They’re young, frustrated white males in their late teens into their early twenties who are having a hard time adjusting to adulthood. They’re the same kinds of people you find in white supremacy writ large,” Beirich said. “They have grievances about the world they’ve placed onto women and black people.“
Its the SPLC boyos, who have of course classified incels as a hate group, along with everything that is pro white or pro male in any way.
Conclusion - Sorry to all the curries, ricecels, blackcels, arabcels out there on this board, you guys are just part of a tiny white minority. Your grievances about the racial imbalances of dating are invalidated and JBW is clearly false because a bunch of quacks, jews, hacks and low IQ nerds on wikipedia say so. Incels are a white movement after all.