Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Japanese citizens in 1913 to 1915.

  • Thread starter Deleted member 24160
  • Start date
Deleted member 24160

Deleted member 24160

Banned
-
Joined
Jan 21, 2020
Posts
6,496
Literally every one of these guys are truecels. I agree now that there should be no interbreeding between races just so these guys won't suffer through the brutal mogging from whites. Seriously just compare pictures of whites back then to these guys.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQAmZ_kR8S8&t=190s
 
looks pretty comfy tbh
 
my dad once told me that my great great great great great great great great grandmother was chinese.Is this possible?Maybe.macau and portugal were semi connected so maybe?

or maybe he was trolling.who knows
 
When the average Japanese did not need to create so many escapisms.
:feelsPop::feelsPop:
 
1598923314973
1598923327770
1598923343476
1598923447671
1598923491730
1598923528554


Idk bro, white poor and middle class dont look to good back then either
 
Most of those guys are old.
Not really, a lot just look older cause people seem to have looked older back then and dressed more serious, and comparable to what was seen in the vllage post you showed.

I think the reason you think whites looked better back then was because the ones you mostly see are either actors/acresses from back then or soldiers ( who have normie level genetics at least).

1598923989101
1598924080668
1598924139419
1598924340462
1598924348616


These soldiers and upper class people look like normies in Japan today (although better dressed and more masculine).
 

Attachments

  • 1598924065729.png
    1598924065729.png
    3.5 MB · Views: 677
Not really, a lot just look older cause people seem to have looked older back then and dressed more serious, and comparable to what was seen in the vllage post you showed.

I think the reason you think whites looked better back then was because the ones you mostly see are either actors/acresses from back then or soldiers ( who have normie level genetics at least).

View attachment 330777View attachment 330781View attachment 330784View attachment 330787View attachment 330788

These soldiers and upper class people look like normies in Japan today (although better dressed and more masculine).

View: https://youtu.be/5HbElEqm1TQ
 
Well they probably are covered in shit, along with sot. Most of them are average though.
Well the ones that weren't covered in the sot would be low tier normie or incel in looks. Meanwhile the kids had many of them look chad-lite potential or above.
Yeah, damn they had to work like slaves. I feel bad for them.
wagecucking of people in the past was brootal
 
Thanks for finding these videos. Colorized videos from the early 1900s are fascinating to watch.
 
Why are curries walking around naked and wearing diapers? I'm not even joking or trying to be funny.
And how are they balancing those baskets on their heads so casually?
Idk maybe a curry could explain
Why are curries walking around naked and wearing diapers? I'm not even joking or trying to be funny.
And how are they balancing those baskets on their heads so casually?
Idk maybe a curry could explain
 
Why are curries walking around naked and wearing diapers? I'm not even joking or trying to be funny.
And how are they balancing those baskets on their heads so casually?
Cultural customs, it was probably hot so that that kind of loose clothing was more commonly worn, hindu religion.
As for the baskets being balanced on heads some people in African communities do that too.
 
Cultural customs, it was probably hot so that that kind of loose clothing was more commonly worn, hindu religion.
As for the baskets being balanced on heads some people in African communities do that too.
Ah thanks, I didn't even know what Hindus traditionally wore before. Weird that in Islamic countries where it's also super hot they do the opposite and fully cover.
And the basket thing is pretty cool, I was curious how they are even doing it.
 
Ah thanks, I didn't even know what Hindus traditionally wore before. Weird that in Islamic countries where it's also super hot they do the opposite and fully cover.
And the basket thing is pretty cool, I was curious how they are even doing it.
Islamic countries have a stricter dress code because imo like other Abrahamic religions being not fully clothed and more or less naked in public is seen as indecent and denying God's will.
No such thing to that extent in Hinduism.
The loose clothing you saw could be a dhoti or lungi https://www.britannica.com/topic/dhoti

The basket thing idk how others manage it either but it seems to stem from historical times where more people worked in agriculture and was once practiced by European women too
 
Islamic countries have a stricter dress code because imo like other Abrahamic religions being not fully clothed and more or less naked in public is seen as indecent and denying God's will.
No such thing to that extent in Hinduism.
The loose clothing you saw could be a dhoti or lungi https://www.britannica.com/topic/dhoti

The basket thing idk how others manage it either but it seems to stem from historical times where more people worked in agriculture and was once practiced by European women too
Thanks for the detailed answer, I just assumed people everywhere wore clothes for their whole body. And that head thing happening in Europe was also cool, didn't know that balancing act was done everywhere.
 
Thanks for the detailed answer, I just assumed people everywhere wore clothes for their whole body. And that head thing happening in Europe was also cool, didn't know that balancing act was done everywhere.
A lot of the modest dress customs came from Abrahamic religions if the people didn't live in cold climes tbhngl
Probaby why a lot of earlier polytheistic religions were seen as degenerate and uncivilized.

I didn't know the head thing happened in Europe either before finding that link tbh I thought it only ever occurred in Africa and India. It makes you think what other practices people in western countries scoff at and mock that their ancestors once themselves took part in.
 
A lot of the modest dress customs came from Abrahamic religions if the people didn't live in cold climes tbhngl
Probaby why a lot of earlier polytheistic religions were seen as degenerate and uncivilized.

I didn't know the head thing happened in Europe either before finding that link tbh I thought it only ever occurred in Africa and India. It makes you think what other practices people in western countries scoff at and mock that their ancestors once themselves took part in.
I guess the noblemen and women wore full clothing regardlessm that seems to be a universal trend that showing skin is sign of peasantry or something, and they would would wear lavish clothing.

Did women also wear immodest clothing before? Like I know the sari would be considered immodest, but I've seen pics of Jain or Buddhist nuns and they worse this. I'm guessing women pretty much wore modest clothing almost everywhere in the past?
1598937717153
1598938061692


For males I am seeing different results. For very ancient times I can find examples of people (males) not being fully clothed

1598939019129


In this picture, only the Assyrians are fully clothed, while the average Nubian, Hittitie, and Egyptian is not.

This is some examples of clothing thought to have been commonly worn by male Chinese farmers and peasants

1598938843897


So I guess a lot of civilizations in the past had male farmers and peasants not wear shirts, although I suspect as clothing got cheaper like in China, it became more common place even without Abrahamic influence.
 
I guess the noblemen and women wore full clothing regardlessm that seems to be a universal trend that showing skin is sign of peasantry or something, and they would would wear lavish clothing.

Did women also wear immodest clothing before? Like I know the sari would be considered immodest, but I've seen pics of Jain or Buddhist nuns and they worse this. I'm guessing women pretty much wore modest clothing almost everywhere in the past?
View attachment 330915View attachment 330919

For males I am seeing different results. For very ancient times I can find examples of people (males) not being fully clothed

View attachment 330931

In this picture, only the Assyrians are fully clothed, while the average Nubian, Hittitie, and Egyptian is not.

This is some examples of clothing thought to have been commonly worn by male Chinese farmers and peasants

View attachment 330925

So I guess a lot of civilizations in the past had male farmers and peasants not wear shirts, although I suspect as clothing got cheaper like in China, it became more common place even without Abrahamic influence.
Yeah the scantily clad women in ethnic countries were even noted by colonizers

Asian and South Asian women can dress very scantily clad compared to women in Europe and anglo countries and this aspect is often played up when they are fetishized in western culture.

Ig it depended on the prevailing attitude toward nakedness, how women should act and behave and religious restrictions or lack thereof.
But probably males probably had a less strict dress code than females because females being as scantily clad would be seen as an invitation for unwanted attention and interest from rival tribes and nations.

I would think job occupation and what clothing was most convenient and easy to make were also factors other than the climate of a region in dictating how men and women there dressed.
 
Yeah the scantily clad women in ethnic countries were even noted by colonizers
Asian and South Asian women can dress very scantily clad compared to women in Europe and anglo countries and this aspect is often played up when they are fetishized in western culture.
Idk bro, those ancient depictions of Chinese women seemed pretty modest to me. Same goes for women from pre-islamic persia.
But damn, you blew my mind on curryland, I guess the nuns count as an occupation. The only problem with western fetishization of it though is that Northern India was persianized in culture, and the Islamic rulers made them adopt their clothing norms. How did this not reach the women in these regions then?
 
Idk bro, those ancient depictions of Chinese women seemed pretty modest to me. Same goes for women from pre-islamic persia.
But damn, you blew my mind on curryland, I guess the nuns count as an occupation. The only problem with western fetishization of it though is that Northern India was persianized in culture, and the Islamic rulers made them adopt their clothing norms. How did this not reach the women in these regions then?

It is colder and less humid in parts of China and pre-islamic Persia so maybe that's why they could bear wearing such heavy clothing even though it could still get hot.

As for why the outside more traditional clothing didn't reach women in more southern portions of India, it's probably because the mountains in central and southern India were hard to traverse and took up too much traveling time for the invaders. If you look at previous conquests most of the conquerors only reached northern India and Pakistan prior to European conquest by Portgual and the English. Central and southern India came under siege much later after sailing, exploration and colonization had become widespread in Europe.

Also maybe the major civilizations in India at the time were in the north in the Indus River Valley and that was regarded as the bulk of India that was attractive land to conquer.
 
It is colder and less humid in parts of China and pre-islamic Persia so maybe that's why they could bear wearing such heavy clothing even though it could still get hot.

As for why the outside more traditional clothing didn't reach women in more southern portions of India, it's probably because the mountains in central and southern India were hard to traverse and took up too much traveling time for the invaders. If you look at previous conquests most of the conquerors only reached northern India and Pakistan prior to European conquest by Portgual and the English. Central and southern India came under siege much later after sailing, exploration and colonization had become widespread in Europe.

Also maybe the major civilizations in India at the time were in the north in the Indus River Valley and that was regarded as the bulk of India that was attractive land to conquer.
Damn, thanks for the history and geo-social political lesson.
 
Damn, thanks for the history and geo-social political lesson.
It's a lot of speculation on my part. But yeah geography, climate, culture and religion has shaped a lot of the ancient world. Pop culture is a more recent but just as pervasive force.
 
Wtf the guys look less trucel than Asians today.
Also those foids look not at all hypergamous, lifefuel for Martymcflycels
 
They all mog me hard.
 
Most Japs don't look that good in my opinion because a good portion of them are descended from Mongol (y-DNA haplogroup C) and Ainu (y-DNA haplogroup D). These two groups likely contributed to the Japanese phenotype their large wide heads and large wide faces.

However, there are a different racial phenotype called the Yakonid (sub-clade of y-DNA haplogroup O3, basically evolved northern han Chinese [north Sinid]), that gives the Japs not only better looks but very superior intelligence. This group without a doubt was responsible for Japan's rapid industrial rise and catch up with the west. I wouldn't be surprised if this phenotype make up a large percentage (larger than the national average) of their ruling elite.

Far east types
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top