(Note: My title is not meant to be taken at literal value. For all I know, which is just enough in some respects, they could have very well addressed this and I just haven't seen it before. Bear in mind that I don't frequent Leftist spaces as they hurt my brain, so...yeah.)
Over the years I've been engaged in the Sisyphean task of debating IT and other Leftist retards, I've come to realize that there's no debating these people. They come into the argument with a Marxist stick up their ass, and you can already tell what they're going to say before they even say it. Although, one thing that I've always wondered about, even before I stopped trying to debate them, was why the male in a given relationship, Sub 6, obviously, isn't allowed to take the lead and has to essentially be the puppet of the female.
My take on it is that since they've been brainwashed by Feminist propaganda, they're trained to see that as "Female Empowerment", whereas a male taking the lead would be seen as "Toxic Masculinity". (Their favorite Word Salad term, BTW)
What do you think, Brocels?
Over the years I've been engaged in the Sisyphean task of debating IT and other Leftist retards, I've come to realize that there's no debating these people. They come into the argument with a Marxist stick up their ass, and you can already tell what they're going to say before they even say it. Although, one thing that I've always wondered about, even before I stopped trying to debate them, was why the male in a given relationship, Sub 6, obviously, isn't allowed to take the lead and has to essentially be the puppet of the female.
My take on it is that since they've been brainwashed by Feminist propaganda, they're trained to see that as "Female Empowerment", whereas a male taking the lead would be seen as "Toxic Masculinity". (Their favorite Word Salad term, BTW)
What do you think, Brocels?
