Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Toxic Femininity It's Silly for Women who Share Pictures or Videos in Revealing or Body-Tight Clothes to Complain About Mens "Warped Views" on Women & Sex

ResidentHell

ResidentHell

Officer
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 30, 2022
Posts
902

I skimmed through some of the videos in this thread, and it made me think… :waitwhat: How can an adult woman who’s aware of the age of consent, upload sexually implicit (or explicit) videos to YouTube and not set age restrictions on the video? It indicates that these women are not particularly concerned about the possibility that underage children, boys specifically, will inadvertently discover their sexually implicit videos

I know someone might argue and say, “Children are supposed to eventually learn about sex at some point”. But this was normally done under regulated conditions, i.e., sex education, D.A.R.E. school program

AFAIK, there are no strict laws that say it’s illegal for underage children to watch pornography. But women who carelessly upload sexually implicit / explicit videos do not seem to be aware that by doing this - They directly contribute to the “warped perceptions of sex / relationships” and “objectification of women” across the demographic of teenage boys and young male adults

[According to NSPCC] Children and young people who watch porn or sexually explicit content are at greater risk of developing: unrealistic attitudes about sex and consent, more negative attitudes about roles and identities in relationships, unrealistic expectations of body image and performance.
It is hypocritical, and maybe even bigoted, for women to complain about men perceiving women as "sex objects" and having “warped attitudes towards sex & relationships with women”, while at the same time, uploading images or videos of themselves half-clothed or in body-tight clothes, to a publicly accessible platform like YouTube or Insta without even setting a minimum age limit on viewership access

How does one expect young boys to receive an “effective” sex education, while being exposed to videos of women behaving playfully while half-clothed or barely clothed? If women cared about the impact they had on the sexual perceptions of young boys, they would be more cautious about sharing these sexually implicit videos / images on a public domain. They wouldn’t just upload these images / videos and not regulate their content (by setting an age restriction on content access). It shows these female content creators do not care about letting young boys receive sex education via the standard procedure (e.g., sex education in school), as it indicates the female content creator does not mind being discovered and potentially “voyeured” by underage boys in an uncontrolled environment

As of writing this post, there are no age restrictions on the videos below:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIAa9_00F_U


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9SQWWVQ87g


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LG-quCLPWmo


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WwQLarpJY8


This one has 17 million views in a month, and isn't even age restricted:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Q8-aEmtATs


The disclaimers at the start of the video are stupid. If there are no age restrictions on the video, clearly the content creators don't mind being "voyeured" by males across all age groups - Including underage males who likely fall into the sexually uneducated / sexually inexperienced demographic

At least this one had enough self-awareness to censor the parts of the video where she had no clothes on:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4ir3pGCH4Q

I think the content creator guideline for these "try on" videos, is to censor the screen only when the woman is completely naked. Even then, virtual nakedness leaves basically nothing to the imagination

There are breastfeeding videos as well. I'm unsure what to make of them. I'm guessing they can be seen as "for educational purposes". But breastfeeding still has sexual innuendo, as "fondling breasts", "sucking breasts" or "looking at breasts" seems to be a fetish for many heterosexual males. I think some of the women in these videos are entirely aware of this, and might even capitalize on it by creating these video clips as a kind of "indirect, softcore porn" to appease to straight males:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTNaC-jfeFk

I find it odd YouTube doesn't even autocensor / auto-restrict these videos :feelshmm:. There are many videos on YouTube, that have women behaving in a playful manner while practically naked, and foids want to complain about men seeing them as "sex objects" and having "warped views on sex". These videos are UNCENSORED and have NO AGE RESTRICTION. These videos are akin to pornography. The focal point of these videos are women who are behaving playfully while virtually naked. But women want to complain about being "sexual objectified" by men. I dont get it :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
They've been jewed
 
They are begging chads to fuck them.
 
Onlyfans and other porn sites aren't enough for them. Every site will be mandated to have foid worship on it. They will advertise on incels.is eventually too.
 
IMG 7288
 
Feminists and woke culture seem to have no issue with women appealing to men as long as it's in some way demeaning to them. As long as it implies somehow that your sexuality is wrong or that you're a bad person in some way.

It's a sad thing. Back in the '90s and '00s even being a heterosexual man wasn't at all maligned but now you're treated as if you're doing something wrong.

I wonder if Western countries will start to outlaw more kinds of porn (real or animated) involving normal looking women.
 
How can an adult woman who’s aware of the age of consent, upload sexually implicit (or explicit) videos to YouTube and not set age restrictions on the video?
Money makes the world go round. If they are getting big bucks from ads or sponsors then they'll keep doing it. Really isn't a mystery.
 
These whores literally objectify themselves and then whine when men do the same.
Sylvester Stallone Facepalm GIF
 
They know if they age restricted videos they'd lose ad revenue.
 
Many foids will deny their true nature of getting off to being objectified
 
How can an adult woman who’s aware of the age of consent, upload sexually implicit (or explicit) videos to YouTube and not set age restrictions on the video? It indicates that these women are not particularly concerned about the possibility that underage children, boys specifically, will inadvertently discover their sexually implicit videos
Yes I have thought about this myself, in my opinion pornstars are paedophiles

Because lets be real, every kid watches porn by like 14, I made a poll about it on here, it was a massive majority viewing it by 14 except in odd circumstances like @Emba being a massive oldfag so he had to no access to porn like us young folk these days

But if you sign on to be a pornstar and choose to do that, you implicitly say hey I dont mind if MILLIONS of children fairly far below the age of consent view my naked body performing sexual acts
But women who carelessly upload sexually implicit / explicit videos do not seem to be aware that by doing this - They directly contribute to the “warped perceptions of sex / relationships” and “objectification of women” across the demographic of teenage boys and young male adults
I've honestly never seen an online whore touch the first point, I think whores will just claim they should be respected :foidSoy: when it comes to objectification but seriously these whores are paedophiles, ive never seen them touch that.
It is hypocritical, and maybe even bigoted, for women to complain about men perceiving women as "sex objects" and having “warped attitudes towards sex & relationships with women”, while at the same time, uploading images or videos of themselves half-clothed or in body-tight clothes, to a publicly accessible platform like YouTube or Insta without even setting a minimum age limit on viewership access
Yes these whores then wonder why they are not respected, not all foids are whores, well in the traditional sense of selling thier body online, but then these foids that dont do stuff like porn or onlyfans, they never denounce the actions of these sluts, foids just mindlessly support each other with you go girl energy since that is scientifically proven and in their nature
This one has 17 million views in a month, and isn't even age restricted:
Mogs pornhub :feelskek:
 
Yes I have thought about this myself, in my opinion pornstars are paedophiles

Because lets be real, every kid watches porn by like 14, I made a poll about it on here, it was a massive majority viewing it by 14 except in odd circumstances like @Emba being a massive oldfag so he had to no access to porn like us young folk these days

But if you sign on to be a pornstar and choose to do that, you implicitly say hey I dont mind if MILLIONS of children fairly far below the age of consent view my naked body performing sexual acts

I've honestly never seen an online whore touch the first point, I think whores will just claim they should be respected :foidSoy: when it comes to objectification but seriously these whores are paedophiles, ive never seen them touch that.

Yes these whores then wonder why they are not respected, not all foids are whores, well in the traditional sense of selling thier body online, but then these foids that dont do stuff like porn or onlyfans, they never denounce the actions of these sluts, foids just mindlessly support each other with you go girl energy since that is scientifically proven and in their nature

Mogs pornhub :feelskek:
I remember when the Sunday paper "panty ads" were my only "porn." I often would stay up all night and walk around early to steal them... Bon temps, 'mi!
 
I remember when the Sunday paper "panty ads" were my only "porn." I often would stay up all night and walk around early to steal them... Bon temps, 'mi!
At least back then the whores could sleep at night knowing they werent exposing themselves to MILLIONS of kids

I too remember looking at half naked women in catalogues in the underwear section as a kid :feelskek:
 
these foids are trash, they have no right to complain about literally anything
 
5A648C5D FE36 4042 B665 2AFCF86F053D

55CF2E38 71CC 4FB8 8746 F26CC61D0943

E9D44D9C 00CC 4BFC 9DA2 3A977F95170D

Fucking cringe festival

773AACE3 DC8F 45F7 9C95 503D90479410

7810CD34 ED6D 4A4C 8555 E976F15AB0B4

GRANDPA TF YOU DOING
 
No need to sell your body on the street corner now it's YouTube and of.
 

I skimmed through some of the videos in this thread, and it made me think… :waitwhat: How can an adult woman who’s aware of the age of consent, upload sexually implicit (or explicit) videos to YouTube and not set age restrictions on the video? It indicates that these women are not particularly concerned about the possibility that underage children, boys specifically, will inadvertently discover their sexually implicit videos

I know someone might argue and say, “Children are supposed to eventually learn about sex at some point”. But this was normally done under regulated conditions, i.e., sex education, D.A.R.E. school program

AFAIK, there are no strict laws that say it’s illegal for underage children to watch pornography. But women who carelessly upload sexually implicit / explicit videos do not seem to be aware that by doing this - They directly contribute to the “warped perceptions of sex / relationships” and “objectification of women” across the demographic of teenage boys and young male adults


It is hypocritical, and maybe even bigoted, for women to complain about men perceiving women as "sex objects" and having “warped attitudes towards sex & relationships with women”, while at the same time, uploading images or videos of themselves half-clothed or in body-tight clothes, to a publicly accessible platform like YouTube or Insta without even setting a minimum age limit on viewership access

How does one expect young boys to receive an “effective” sex education, while being exposed to videos of women behaving playfully while half-clothed or barely clothed? If women cared about the impact they had on the sexual perceptions of young boys, they would be more cautious about sharing these sexually implicit videos / images on a public domain. They wouldn’t just upload these images / videos and not regulate their content (by setting an age restriction on content access). It shows these female content creators do not care about letting young boys receive sex education via the standard procedure (e.g., sex education in school), as it indicates the female content creator does not mind being discovered and potentially “voyeured” by underage boys in an uncontrolled environment

As of writing this post, there are no age restrictions on the videos below:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIAa9_00F_U


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9SQWWVQ87g


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LG-quCLPWmo


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WwQLarpJY8


This one has 17 million views in a month, and isn't even age restricted:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Q8-aEmtATs


The disclaimers at the start of the video are stupid. If there are no age restrictions on the video, clearly the content creators don't mind being "voyeured" by males across all age groups - Including underage males who likely fall into the sexually uneducated / sexually inexperienced demographic

At least this one had enough self-awareness to censor the parts of the video where she had no clothes on:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4ir3pGCH4Q

I think the content creator guideline for these "try on" videos, is to censor the screen only when the woman is completely naked. Even then, virtual nakedness leaves basically nothing to the imagination

There are breastfeeding videos as well. I'm unsure what to make of them. I'm guessing they can be seen as "for educational purposes". But breastfeeding still has sexual innuendo, as "fondling breasts", "sucking breasts" or "looking at breasts" seems to be a fetish for many heterosexual males. I think some of the women in these videos are entirely aware of this, and might even capitalize on it by creating these video clips as a kind of "indirect, softcore porn" to appease to straight males:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTNaC-jfeFk

I find it odd YouTube doesn't even autocensor / auto-restrict these videos :feelshmm:. There are many videos on YouTube, that have women behaving in a playful manner while practically naked, and foids want to complain about men seeing them as "sex objects" and having "warped views on sex". These videos are UNCENSORED and have NO AGE RESTRICTION. These videos are akin to pornography. The focal point of these videos are women who are behaving playfully while virtually naked. But women want to complain about being "sexual objectified" by men. I dont get it :rolleyes:

You should learn about exposure theory, basically women do this intentionally. I think that's what it's called. Basically women absolutely love it when people admire their bodies, no matter who it is. They just pretend to not like it to seem like they have self respect, but they want to be worshipped b y everyone, even men they hate.
 
1716824567340
1716824689497

"IT IS NOT INTENDED FOR SEXUAL GRATIFICATION"

:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top