Blackpill "It's over" is a foid worship incantation.

[K9Otaku]

Rejecting "it's over" is some MGTOW shit though.

Certainly not. It is

 

[JayGoptri]

It also important to accept that there is nothing to admit.

This can be true in limited circumstances, yes. But is often not the case. Especially when we are attempting to do our own "based Psychoanalysis" on ourselves like we do here on .is

 

[JayGoptri]

Rejecting "it's over" is some MGTOW shit though.

How?

 

[ResidentHell]

Biological sexual desire does not kill you if you don't satisfy it. Beta males and monks prove that.

The fact that we are led to depression and rope PROVES that there is more than just biology at play here. That additional factor is foid worship.

Gonna have to address this misconception @K9Otaku. You seem to have the idea that desire of an object automatically correlates with worship of the object.

There are two dilemmas about "worship" in relation to the object of desire thats perceived to be a source of satisfaction:

The 1st dilemma - If a person were to seek validation or "consent" from another party, the person may be considered a "worshipper" of said party, because of their action to respect the word / actions of said party. For example, a person approaches foid and consciously asks for sex / friendship. Regardless of whether the foid agrees or declines, this would inevitably be an act of foid worship, because its a situation where the person has placed themselves at the mercy of foid and submitted to compliance with the stated interests of the targeted foid. Even if the male has the power to act against the foid's wishes - The fact that male decided to respect the foid's stated wish, it ultimately amounts to mere foid worship.


The 2nd dilemma - Lets say the object of this "desire" has no will, or does have a will but its completely disregarded by the person who perceived them as an object of their "desire" --- Would it still be fair to assume "worship" has taken place in the instance where the object of desire had no will? Or in the instance where the object was forcefully used to satsify the person who perceived this object as a source of fulfillment, irrespective of whether or not the object had a desire?

Here are two examples of how the 2nd dilemma may affecf "foid worship":

Example 1 - Lets say that foids are actually foids, as in:

(i) A collective of nonsentient biological devices that are supported by a hive intelligence system, that provides them with the ability to operate stand-alone

or

(ii) A collective of nonsentient biodevices, directly linked to a wireless network, which is powered by one or more "servers" that directly support the processes of all the connected bio-devices (which in this case are human females).

In this case, would it still be "foid worship", when the object of desire is not self-aware? Probably yes, because things that aren't perceived to have any self-awareness can still be glorified. It can be described as "idolatry", like the divinization of some tangible object.


Example 2 - The use of force, or action without consent.

Let's say (in GTA V), that a man decided to rape another foid. The phenomenon of rape is based on the object of desire being perceived to be source of sexual satisfaction, but for this case the object's will is completely disregarded (presuming they have one). Would it still be an act of "foid worship" if force were to be used by the person who perceives this object as a source of sexual fulfillment? Probably not, because the object that's domimated or subdued wouldn't really be esteemed or worshiped for being domimated or subdued by human standards.

In summary, desire of an object doesnt automatically correspond to worship of object. This applies in context of sexual desire of foids. Why? Because objects of desire dont always have to be treated with "respect" or TLC. The object of desire can always be handled with force, or be forced into submission, by the person who perceives the object as a source of satisfaction.

If a person (in GTA V) would only use force or another deliberately malicious / violent method to obtain sex from foids (e.g rape or blackmail), that person by definition wouldnt necessarily be a "foid worshipper", even if they possess a sexual desire for foids.