Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

It's Over Its over for racistcels

Crustaciouse

Crustaciouse

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
7,776
Pretty much 99.9% of below 40 females hold far left wing beliefs, and this includes supporting dieversity and mass immigration.
So obviously they will outright reject a guy if he shows any kind of offensive beliefs (obviously this only applies for sub8 men)
But what's interesting is these females say they are opposed to racism, even though they are more racist than any racistcel.
Ask a female if they would date an Indian and their facial expression will be disgust.
Most females have racial preferences (whether they go for chads, tyrones, change etc)
Meanwhile men will fuck anything they are attracted to. You have tons of white nationalists with yellow fever for example.
 
Fuck racism.

Besides Asia will always be racist, they do not have the cuck genes that westerners do.

I can be racist all I want with an Asian chick as long as she's not westernized.
 
Women believe whatever the media tells them to believe, so yeah
 
Its over if you're not an NPC

 
Offensive beliefs = nostrils showing jaw looks head etc. Everything else is bs.
 
Racial preferences in dating is underlying racism, these foids are too low iq to realize this and will justify their racism until they're blue in the face. Women are by FAR the most racist demographic.
 
Women believe whatever the media tells them to believe, so yeah
they’re NPCmaxxed they’re basically just cheap source code
 
Racial preferences in dating is underlying racism, these foids are too low iq to realize this and will justify their racism until they're blue in the face. Women are by FAR the most racist demographic.
 
Racial preferences in dating is underlying racism, these foids are too low iq to realize this and will justify their racism until they're blue in the face. Women are by FAR the most racist demographic.
“I can’t help who I’m attracted to teehee. The heart wants what it wants”

it’s not her fault therefore she’s not racist
 
Fuck racism.

Besides Asia will always be racist, they do not have the cuck genes that westerners do.

I can be racist all I want with an Asian chick as long as she's not westernized.
 
Racial preferences in dating is underlying racism, these foids are too low iq to realize this and will justify their racism until they're blue in the face. Women are by FAR the most racist demographic.
 
It's over for altrightcels
 
Foids are the cause of racism.
 
But what's interesting is these females say they are opposed to racism, even though they are more racist than any racistcel.
Ask a female if they would date an Indian and their facial expression will be disgust.
Most females have racial preferences (whether they go for chads, tyrones, change etc)
Meanwhile men will fuck anything they are attracted to. You have tons of white nationalists with yellow fever for example.

Women are socially liberal when it goes for building government programs that help them. The more gov't to protect "minorities" and the "weak" the better, since these are always designed to help women too.

But they are Nazis in the bedroom.

They're selfish to the death.
 
very true

although there are a few foids associated with far right stuff. they are mostly playing numbers game. tons of dudes and few females, easy to get lots of attention from incel alt right fags (i know cause im one of them)
 
Faking being far left is easy
 
Fuck racism.

Besides Asia will always be racist, they do not have the cuck genes that westerners do.

I can be racist all I want with an Asian chick as long as she's not westernized.
You think asian sluts are better? C.O.P.E Tiny little rice whores with inferior genes
 
Last edited:
extremely low-iq
Pretty much 99.9% of below 40 females hold far left wing beliefs
JFL at this retardness
left-wing = equality
do you think females support equality?
They want Chadistocracy
 
Eh, women can easily be moulded in both ways. Most women are apolitical, which is in line with their amoral nature. The female vote is what got Hitler into power
 
Orange man bad
Gesticulating soycuck
 
im racist against niggers.
 
Women don't have opinions, they simply spout whatever they believe the general group consensus is. Nazi chad will have them rounding up jews in no time flat.
 
If the are supporting diversity and mass immigration, then why are they against women refugees?
The only thing women are supporting is more chad access.
 
Preference is tacit racism.
but they think that preference as a form of racism doesn't have an oppression value that is monumentous enough to make them deny their preference bias. That the peope ewho get butthurt about racial preference are greedy/ insensible/ want female approval. Where it's actually more of a humanitarian expense ot acclimatize people's will to deny preference.

It's about happy on the horizon and humanitarianism for women. Whatever comes good for hteir demogrpahic or for the whole community. (BUt that's just a mask for their demographic being elevated alot of hte time)

Rmember, a certain trait is accessible for freedom, but must be barred for the sake of humanitarianal happiness.
Where denying preference among women is more harmful to humanitarianal happiness overall because it impedes freedom.
Freedom/ joy in lifestyle above equality in this case. It's about what htey underlyingly calculate will be good/ loving/ joyous for the horizon of humanity.
But incels will still have a hard time. Liberalism can only affect so many things, and cannot solve the plights in ways where resolving them would cause dismay/ difficulty with freedom/ choice for others.


Women are laidbacker in attitude. They want life to be super chilledout/ mellowedout but this is only to conceal what they really beleive. WOmen outwardly advocate waht they want the general public to believe, and what will have the public be blown off their trail. They're completely proud of being machiavellian.

Women are humanitarian/ maternal at heart. But Liberalism is veryyyy short sighted, and the far sighted people who know about the tendencies of those who need humanitarian headway... are knowing the truth about how they need it because they're dysfunctional/ lazy/ incapable. The world today has opportunities that any of our ancestors in the last 5000 years would have taken and would become well off. They're bad off today because they're lazy/ genetically incapable/ impulsively compulsive.
Fuck racism.

Besides Asia will always be racist, they do not have the cuck genes that westerners do.

I can be racist all I want with an Asian chick as long as she's not westernized.
Even South Asians are racist. Pakistani girl told me they don't wear hijabs, but hte somalians do because of their cringe frizz hair.
Pretty much 99.9% of below 40 females hold far left wing beliefs, and this includes supporting dieversity and mass immigration.
So obviously they will outright reject a guy if he shows any kind of offensive beliefs (obviously this only applies for sub8 men)
But what's interesting is these females say they are opposed to racism, even though they are more racist than any racistcel.
Ask a female if they would date an Indian and their facial expression will be disgust.
Most females have racial preferences (whether they go for chads, tyrones, change etc)
Meanwhile men will fuck anything they are attracted to. You have tons of white nationalists with yellow fever for example.
Reason is because women are maternal natured. But they're also not pragmatic, and are brightsiders in general. They don't see the bigger picture about human carnality/ ferality/ primality that is exponentialized in the nonwhite races.
Women liking to see the bright side, and expand on it in broken men (non white savages) is their undoing. Fixing broken men instinct will kill the western world.
Women are predisposed to find ugly men creepy. But a lot of information doesn't get transferred over into their perception/ future prediction/ worldview system. It's more just a reflexive informational piece. They don't see any need for transferring the information abotu how creepy/ ugly guys (most ethnics) are not their preference. But they still want to somehow have them integrated...? Their values are inconsistent. Their perception of how the world works is a mispremise.
THis is a contradiciton and elads to al ot of disassociation. Women mispremise a lot of their ideas. If they don't like nonwhites for a lot of primal factors, then they shouldnt' want them in there.
But there will always be the need for them to look fashionable/ open/ daisy dreamy, and to have a suck my ass attitude if anyone contrasts it.
 
Last edited:
Only sub 8 men needs to have a compatible personality anyway, including politics, if a chad wants to use your sjw feminist whore like a cumdumpster for one night she will accept not matter if he's Richard Spencer brother.
 

Similar threads

forteanSocietySpy
Replies
6
Views
383
slapthatsillywilly
slapthatsillywilly
lowz1r
Replies
22
Views
707
userrrr
userrrr
NIKOCADO AVOCADO
Replies
51
Views
1K
qtchess
qtchess
SlayerSlayer
Replies
117
Views
4K
IncelKing
IncelKing
Tacomonkey
Replies
20
Views
701
Tacomonkey
Tacomonkey

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top