We already know that it's over for short men. 
But it will get worse.
First of all, while genetics play a key role in determining height, experts say that there's more to it than that.
The first thing that proves it is the fact that the average height has increased over time.
When we compare a man who was 18 years old in 1896 to one from 1996, we see a significant difference.
In 1896, the average male height was 162.48 cm.
In 1996, it was 171.28 cm.
It’s important to note that the average height increased only in developed countries.
This means that if undeveloped countries were to become developed, their average heights would also increase significantly.
The reason for this increase is factors like health, nutrition, and living conditions. Genetics don’t change, but the way people feed themselves and live does.
Why did I say it’s over for short men in the future?
Some might argue:
“Then being short will just mean something different, and the percentage of short people won’t change.”
But that’s wrong. People who are 165 cm today will be considered even shorter in the future, and the number of short people will actually decrease.
Why will the number of short people decrease?
If populations like Indians, Asians, and Africans gain wealth and access to better nutrition, they won’t remain short. Their average height will increase significantly, and only a few unlucky short individuals will remain. For those people, life will be brutal.
Some scientists suggest there’s a biological limit to how tall humans can grow, and that the average male height has already plateaued in Europe and other developed regions. That might be true, but as poorer countries improve, their populations will still get taller, and the worldwide average male height will increase further.
The same logic applies to foids, which could make things even worse for short men. They might end up shorter than a growing number of foids.
I hope you follow the logic here, but there are many ways to look at this issue.
What about global inequality?
Some might say that as global resources decrease, only the wealthy will afford the best nutrition while others struggle, leading to a greater gap in height.
But in that case, nothing really changes. The wealthy Chads will still dominate socially, while there will just be more shortcels.
It's over, and for the future short man, it's going to be worse. Brutal.
Anyway we will get older so it doesn't matter for us, we will either rope or continue to cope as a 40 yo virgin.
But it will get worse.
First of all, while genetics play a key role in determining height, experts say that there's more to it than that.
The first thing that proves it is the fact that the average height has increased over time.
When we compare a man who was 18 years old in 1896 to one from 1996, we see a significant difference.
In 1896, the average male height was 162.48 cm.
In 1996, it was 171.28 cm.
It’s important to note that the average height increased only in developed countries.
This means that if undeveloped countries were to become developed, their average heights would also increase significantly.
The reason for this increase is factors like health, nutrition, and living conditions. Genetics don’t change, but the way people feed themselves and live does.
Why did I say it’s over for short men in the future?
Some might argue:
“Then being short will just mean something different, and the percentage of short people won’t change.”
But that’s wrong. People who are 165 cm today will be considered even shorter in the future, and the number of short people will actually decrease.
Why will the number of short people decrease?
If populations like Indians, Asians, and Africans gain wealth and access to better nutrition, they won’t remain short. Their average height will increase significantly, and only a few unlucky short individuals will remain. For those people, life will be brutal.
Some scientists suggest there’s a biological limit to how tall humans can grow, and that the average male height has already plateaued in Europe and other developed regions. That might be true, but as poorer countries improve, their populations will still get taller, and the worldwide average male height will increase further.
The same logic applies to foids, which could make things even worse for short men. They might end up shorter than a growing number of foids.
I hope you follow the logic here, but there are many ways to look at this issue.
What about global inequality?
Some might say that as global resources decrease, only the wealthy will afford the best nutrition while others struggle, leading to a greater gap in height.
But in that case, nothing really changes. The wealthy Chads will still dominate socially, while there will just be more shortcels.
It's over, and for the future short man, it's going to be worse. Brutal.
Anyway we will get older so it doesn't matter for us, we will either rope or continue to cope as a 40 yo virgin.
