I
It's that people abstract him as valuable and then he just has a natural positive physical and phrenic pheromonic presence. One that people like and praise him for. Wits, charm, charisma is less about the actual tactics of social conduct, and more about who is doing it, and the unique traits he possesses. People are inclined to people for the sake of what their presence, traits, etc. subverbalizes. The prospect and power of it all. That gives him prominence. Imagine someone doing the exact same facial motions if he's a stinky chink compared to a white teeth dimpled blonde chad. The latter chad could be autistic and still get pussy. Women don't predicate their interest in male genetics by his mental composition. But by their bodily proportions which creates the halo effect, dangerously impressive distinctive traits in their respective tyrannarchies/ primarchies/ etc. That's what women want. Being smart at the expense of the male role of just being a chad/meathead/dominarchial prodigy makes you an anomaly, or a nerd and then women will steer clear of you because of your lifestyle. But being kind of quiet, and kinda dumb isn't usually a bad thing for women. If the value of your genetic capital can outweigh your autist/ nerd lifestyle capital, you'll get laid. The male role of being stupid/ quiet/ giving off a high value dominarchial presence at the expense of tact and being affluent socially
Talking intellectually creates a pretty soft atmosphere tbh. When you're making good points around braindead gangsters, what happens? They perceive you as weak for predicating your mind on logic, not the harsh brutal demeanor of rap, of smoking weed, of doing dangerous and destructive shit. That kind of atmosphere keeps them down, and most white people afraid. ~~ And the same applies with women. If you are too
That's what gives him the confidence. Confidence is a state of mind, garnered by external factors. People talk about confidence as if being that alone, while playing with power rangers and getting wedgies is how you should be. It's just a tricky trippy trap to put people out of being insecure, and finding ways to self improve, because society doesn't want intellectual navigators, that is, if they're even conscious about the mendacity of the confidence myth.
Confidence is the effect of substance. Insecurity is lacking substance and being substance intensive in your thinking. Formulaic. So they think you could be confident without substance. Confidence creates a pheromone.
Someone saying confidence works in getting people to like you is like saying that happiness is what makes good ice cream. It's like saying relaxation makes a good swimming pool. That excitement makes a good rollercoaster. They establish the condition of the thing after the fact and they don't know how it's been built. It hasn't been instructed deliberately because they want you to be misled, and to think that the distinctive aspect of what makes people alpha/ powerful primarchially/ attractive comes from the state of mind of success rather than the substance of success itself. You're supposed to think that Confidence works because of its pheromonic effect, and that it comes from a state of mind, but no pheromones are a small part of it, and they don't come from your state of mind entirely, not even to a great extent at all, but from what people glean and gauge from you as an entirety. Your background, your abilities, competencies, etc. Primarchial power and ability to command. But confidence being the hallmark of it? No, that's what your mind receives from the substance of the source of being attractive to girls. Confidence is NOT the substance that leads to success in of itself.
It's an abstract feeling but a feeling doesn't necessarily make you more distinct in the extreme majority's judgment system. Unless it has external expressions that get into people's way. Like being a proud confident idiot being annoying, or being inspiring. But your self opinion/ self feeling doesn't constitute your value to the other person's esteem system. If you are confident you may display it to people in a way that they may not like or that they may like. It all depends. But ultimately, people generally want value via how impactful you are positive or negative, and to get to the point of seduction from your impact, your internal belief system will not be at that effect.
It's just that people don't want you to be influential, just to be confident being yourself. But that is a prevarication to the question of "how can I get girls to like me?". It's just a subtle implicit message to just say "fuck girls just be yourself". But being yourself isn't what vanity minded narcissists want.
It's extrinsic stuff/ stuff that impacts the external world where we are intersecting that defines us people's judgment of selectivity by other people. People are looking for gratification, how do your own feelings give people gratification? No, prowess, prominence, primarchial and dominarchial power do.
They can predict and assume whatever they want onto your identity, but so long as you have the substance that is definingly dominant/ powerful/ then you are valuable.
Talking intellectually creates a pretty soft atmosphere tbh. When you're making good points around braindead gangsters, what happens? They perceive you as weak for predicating your mind on logic, not the harsh brutal demeanor of rap, of smoking weed, of doing dangerous and destructive shit. That kind of atmosphere keeps them down, and most white people afraid. ~~ And the same applies with women. If you are too
That's what gives him the confidence. Confidence is a state of mind, garnered by external factors. People talk about confidence as if being that alone, while playing with power rangers and getting wedgies is how you should be. It's just a tricky trippy trap to put people out of being insecure, and finding ways to self improve, because society doesn't want intellectual navigators, that is, if they're even conscious about the mendacity of the confidence myth.
Confidence is the effect of substance. Insecurity is lacking substance and being substance intensive in your thinking. Formulaic. So they think you could be confident without substance. Confidence creates a pheromone.
Someone saying confidence works in getting people to like you is like saying that happiness is what makes good ice cream. It's like saying relaxation makes a good swimming pool. That excitement makes a good rollercoaster. They establish the condition of the thing after the fact and they don't know how it's been built. It hasn't been instructed deliberately because they want you to be misled, and to think that the distinctive aspect of what makes people alpha/ powerful primarchially/ attractive comes from the state of mind of success rather than the substance of success itself. You're supposed to think that Confidence works because of its pheromonic effect, and that it comes from a state of mind, but no pheromones are a small part of it, and they don't come from your state of mind entirely, not even to a great extent at all, but from what people glean and gauge from you as an entirety. Your background, your abilities, competencies, etc. Primarchial power and ability to command. But confidence being the hallmark of it? No, that's what your mind receives from the substance of the source of being attractive to girls. Confidence is NOT the substance that leads to success in of itself.
It's an abstract feeling but a feeling doesn't necessarily make you more distinct in the extreme majority's judgment system. Unless it has external expressions that get into people's way. Like being a proud confident idiot being annoying, or being inspiring. But your self opinion/ self feeling doesn't constitute your value to the other person's esteem system. If you are confident you may display it to people in a way that they may not like or that they may like. It all depends. But ultimately, people generally want value via how impactful you are positive or negative, and to get to the point of seduction from your impact, your internal belief system will not be at that effect.
It's just that people don't want you to be influential, just to be confident being yourself. But that is a prevarication to the question of "how can I get girls to like me?". It's just a subtle implicit message to just say "fuck girls just be yourself". But being yourself isn't what vanity minded narcissists want.
It's extrinsic stuff/ stuff that impacts the external world where we are intersecting that defines us people's judgment of selectivity by other people. People are looking for gratification, how do your own feelings give people gratification? No, prowess, prominence, primarchial and dominarchial power do.
They can predict and assume whatever they want onto your identity, but so long as you have the substance that is definingly dominant/ powerful/ then you are valuable.
