LMAO JFL @ if you believe in this shit. Archko was fabricated during the 12th century.
Only white people in that area and during that time were Romans (and some Greeks, close to white). If he looked like one of them everyone would know. Nazarites (and people from Galilee) were not whites. Yea, some of them might have comparatively fairer skin than other middle easterners but they were never blonde.
Yea some north African Barber and Algerians have light eye colors (green/blue), even some of them have blonde hair but still they are not whites. You could say they have white admixtures at most.
His mother, father, brothers, whole family had Hebrew names and they were all Jews and they are from freaking Bethlehem, not from Scandinavia.
Not an argument in some areas, this is blatantly false tho, Galileans were not Jews, at least not in the modern sense of the word, the classical sense sure, but Jews as we know them today were called Pharisees in the Bible. Galilean migration patterns can be traced back to Europe.
View attachment 144929
If you don't want to watch the video, basically in a nutshell the mongrel stock of people known as Jews today came from the south of Israel, while Galileans came from the north, and their origins can be traced back to Europe. They were white, albeit some might have been sunburnt/tanned. Just because you are blonde/dark haired blonde like Jesus was with greyish blue eyes I believe from various correlated descriptions doesn't mean he was scandanavian. There were blondes from various parts of the whole of people of European decent I think even some Romans, albeit maybe a bit rarer there.
Also the fact that half of his genetics, possibly all, depending if the method used to impregnate Mary was artificial insemination, or implanting a fertilized egg, yunno from God, and not Galilean, could have highly influenced his appearance, but it was probably artificial insemination logically speaking, and the fact many people didn't even mention his appearance unless they weren't Galilean, such as the Jews who hated him, Romans who hated him, etc, all point to this.
Most blonde blue eyed europeans from southern europe and below got bred out of existence and taken as slaves because of Muslims ruining everything as they do, long before any modern time destruction of the white race.
In regards to The Archko Volume, specifically I have read things that say its false/inaccurate, but barely any detailed descriptions as to why. Also what makes me more likely to discount these claims is where these claims are coming from, however if there is a detailed debunking of it, i'd be happy to discount it, however that still doesn't debunk other descriptions, and it lines up with what we know about for example Galilean migration data, and the origin of the pharisees.
