Takeyami1987
Banned
-
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2025
- Posts
- 341
I'm pretty sure we all know at this point this isn't true and in fact hypergamy might even be dysgenic due to the fact that higher IQ indivduals are less likely to have sex. However beyond all that, what frustrates me most when they make this argument is you know in no other circumstance would they ever acknowledge genes, inherent traits, or stuff like that. Nor will they acknowledge that women can also carry bad genes or unattractive features. Incels will continue to be created because 5s can now marry 9s and ruin their genes.
They will deny IQ, push blank slatism, deny inherent traits, deny all sorts of science but the one time they will acknowledge anything about genetics is to make a faulty argument about why incels aint gettin dat muffugin pussy.
The one thing all incels should keep in mind though is you are not inferior just because foids won't fuck you. There is no eugenic advantage to sharp jaw bones or hunter eyes. It's all sexual selection.
They will deny IQ, push blank slatism, deny inherent traits, deny all sorts of science but the one time they will acknowledge anything about genetics is to make a faulty argument about why incels aint gettin dat muffugin pussy.
The one thing all incels should keep in mind though is you are not inferior just because foids won't fuck you. There is no eugenic advantage to sharp jaw bones or hunter eyes. It's all sexual selection.





