So, remember that part where I said,
I'm pretty sure that they're so low IQ this post will end up on IT, and they'll claim I'm endorsing violence. Despite me implying the exact opposite, guess we'll see though.
Well it seems I was right.
Lets see here, what they took from all of that, once again, was to claim that I'm somehow trying to justify someone else's actions. Despite that being exactly the opposite of what I was saying?
there is nothing about nature which can be justified
What is it that they aren't getting? Calling these people stupid can't be accurate, because I really don't believe that's the issue at play here. At the very least, I don't suspect that this particular user is willing to be even remotely honest.
No IT, sexual failure doesn't make rape and murder okay. Got that? However, simply because something isn't justified doesn't mean that it's whatsoever unexpected, nor does it mean that the situation that drove them to such actions was warranted or any less unfair. I'll repeat myself, but this time phrase it even more clearly. My main point is that people who attempt to downplay and justify inceldom as being natural would be hypocrites if they didn't do the same for violence, an equally natural occurrence, however my perception of nature doesn't lead me to believe that any of it is justifiable.
Can't say I'm surprised that IT ignored everything I said and simply put words in my mouth, but sure, it's us who are the "bad guys" for being evil incels. Is that about right? They have over 250k members, let that sink in.