Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel "It's just natural selection bro"

  • Thread starter Deleted member 8353
  • Start date
Deleted member 8353

Deleted member 8353

Former Hikikomori, Aimless Pleasure Seeker
-
Joined
May 29, 2018
Posts
9,335
I'm not sure there is a word which properly emphasizes how much I hate when normies/sexhavers say this in reference to us.

People are so quick to justify that which is unjustifiable, at least when it doesn't concern themselves. For those of you normies who dismiss our struggles with this (mostly tacit) appeal to nature, keep in mind, both rape and murder are just as natural as sexual failure. If you ever cross paths with a pretty rare individual who CHOoses a diffERent path in response to social/sexual exclusion, would you be content with being killed since it's a perfectly natural thing to have happen to you? I'm guessing not.

Those of you normies who think in this manner, maybe instead of pretending to hold any sort of "moral high ground", you could start at least attempting to offer some honesty. That is to say you could acknowledge that you're alright with bad things happening, so long as they only happen to other people. If you normies don't agree with that sentence, then I'd advise you to stop informing us of the natural origin of our condition, at least as an attempt at justification anyway. Many of you seem to be contradicting your own beliefs.

I'll be clear, there is nothing about nature which can be justified, it's simply a deathmatch in which there are no real winners, only measurements of for long it is that someone loses, and how badly it hurts when the inevitable occurs.
 
If incels don't have sex is natural selection, then people ER and CHO killed is a part of the natural selection
 
Who says this?
 
normies want natural selection? :feelshmm:
See the source image
 
If incels don't have sex is natural selection, then people ER and CHO killed is a part of the natural selection
High IQ
Just an organism adapting to its environment
 
It's only "natural selection" when they want it to be.
 
I've seen this sentiment plainly stated on IT many times, and really everywhere it is that people mock and criticize us.

I don't hear this on IncelTears. What I hear on IncelTears is "Incels are only incel because of their choices, not any fault or flaw of society. It's because they're jerks, not because they're ugly."
 
I don't hear this on IncelTears. What I hear on IncelTears is "Incels are only incel because of their choices, not any fault or flaw of society. It's because they're jerks, not because they're ugly."
Well I'd agree that I see statements like that more often there, but it's stuff like the topic that tends to bother me more tbh.
 
We need to put all these bullshitters naked on empty island for a lifelong battle royal. Maybe then they change their mind about natural selection.
 
It’s retarded that people claim "natural selection" when it is usually the ugly foids that pass on the shitty genes because of how easy they have it.
 
personally havent really heard "Its just natural selection bro" from normies either, they usually dont understand anything about biology and evolution to even take first steps in that direction, but still, good post Claymore-cel :feelsokman:
I'll be clear, there is nothing about nature which can be justified, it's simply a deathmatch in which there are no real winners, only measurements of for long it is that someone loses, and how badly it hurts when the inevitable occurs.
 
We need to put all these bullshitters naked on empty island for a lifelong battle royal. Maybe then they change their mind about natural selection.
I agree.

Although I'm pretty sure that they're so low IQ this post will end up on IT, and they'll claim I'm endorsing violence. Despite me implying the exact opposite, guess we'll see though.
personally havent really heard "Its just natural selection bro" from normies either, they usually dont understand anything about biology and evolution to even take first steps in that direction, but still, good post Claymore-cel :feelsokman:
I probably read too many comment sections tbh:feelsrope:
 
The holocaust was just natural selection bro
 
Normies parents get murdered*

Incel: it’s just natural selection bro.

Normie: reeee
 
For me the worst part is when they are saying "I'm glad they can't spread their genes", basically insulting our potential children as subhuman scum.
 
Why do you waste your time, energy, and braincells trying to reason with normies and IT cucks? Nothing will change their mind and yes most people don't care for the ills of others since it's not happening to them, also you're wasting yourself trying to get them to be honest as well. Human beings don't like being seen as evil, so they pretend to be good and taking the moral high ground. Find a good cope rather than spending your time trying to reason with people who think 2+2 =5.
 
I hear it from other incels sometimes.
 
Admitting that they're okay with bad things happening to us just because of our looks will strip them if thier self espoused "moral high ground". They view themselves as the good guys who are serving as "watchdogs" over us.
 
I hear it from other incels sometimes.
This thread applies to them as well, accepting inceldom because it's "natural selection" has to be among the worst of copes, basically telling the world "I'm a cosmic cuckold" tbh.
Admitting that they're okay with bad things happening to us just because of our looks will strip them if thier self espoused "moral high ground". They view themselves as the good guys who are serving as "watchdogs" over us.
Precisely, they're nearly all dishonest bullies.
 
Last edited:
Guests: 72

I suppose I hit the nail on the head, so to speak:feelskek:
 
It’s retarded that people claim "natural selection" when it is usually the ugly foids that pass on the shitty genes because of how easy they have it.
So much truth
 
Then ovarybots has to stop sue for rape , because rape is natural selection.
 
JFL I've seen fellow incels who say this shit as well. I'm glad most here agree that that is a cucked mentality.
 
I'm not sure there is a word which properly emphasizes how much I hate when normies/sexhavers say this in reference to us.

People are so quick to justify that which is unjustifiable, at least when it doesn't concern themselves. For those of you normies who dismiss our struggles with this (mostly tacit) appeal to nature, keep in mind, both rape and murder are just as natural as sexual failure. If you ever cross paths with a pretty rare individual who CHOoses a diffERent path in response to social/sexual exclusion, would you be content with being killed since it's a perfectly natural thing to have happen to you? I'm guessing not.

Those of you normies who think in this manner, maybe instead of pretending to hold any sort of "moral high ground", you could start at least attempting to offer some honesty. That is to say you could acknowledge that you're alright with bad things happening, so long as they only happen to other people. If you normies don't agree with that sentence, then I'd advise you to stop informing us of the natural origin of our condition, at least as an attempt at justification anyway. Many of you seem to be contradicting your own beliefs.

I'll be clear, there is nothing about nature which can be justified, it's simply a deathmatch in which there are no real winners, only measurements of for long it is that someone loses, and how badly it hurts when the inevitable occurs.
I fully heartily agree with this post.
Oh boy... The hypocrisy.
 
I’m not saying it’s “right” but inceldom is a naturally occurring condition
 
I’m not saying it’s “right” but inceldom is a naturally occurring condition
I agree with this obviously, it's just when people extrapolate that to fit within their inconsistent notions of morality or ethical theory, well that's when I begin to take issue with it. Ngl, I all but guarantee that everyone who believes our situation is somehow justified because it's naturally occurring holds some massive double standards.
 
If it were natural selection then wouldn't sub 5 genes have died out by now?

Or is what incels say about the past true? Need a normie/larper to explain.
 
I agree with this obviously, it's just when people extrapolate that to fit within their inconsistent notions of morality or ethical theory, well that's when I begin to take issue with it. Ngl, I all but guarantee that everyone who believes our situation is somehow justified because it's naturally occurring holds some massive double standards.
I don’t look at my situation from a moral perspective. All I know is that no woman has a genetic insentive to view me as mating material. I only think in terms of ethics when normies take it a step farther and persecute genetic dead ends such as myself
 
natural = things i like

not natural = things i don't like
 
If it were natural selection then wouldn't sub 5 genes have died out by now?

Or is what incels say about the past true? Need a normie/larper to explain.
There are a lot of things to consider, chief among them would probably be the fact that despite the assertions of some, what we have right now isn't an example of a natural environment or sexual marketplace. While it's true that foids would naturally gravitate to the highest value male in her vicinity, that male wouldn't necessarily be the best looking, but rather the strongest and most capable. While these things are correlated, they're not the same. Keep in mind that in some sort of pre-agriculture tribe, it would be over for me anyway, just for different reasons, so I don't have anything to gain from stating this.

Also following from that, you have to remember that we've had sub 5 genes being passed down countless generations of men due to monogamy and civilization, not to mention that such concerns don't affect sub 5 females in the least.
 
I have a feeling that while looks are correlated to genetics, there is a degree of randomness that escapes any logical prediction.
 
" Some people lose at the genetic lottery bro, its just a part of life, you just gotta deal with it the best you can" :soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:
 
These are the same people that think giving hormone blockers and dressing their prepubescent sons in women’s clothing is perfectly natural.
 
When incels can't have sex it is natural thing and perfectly normal.
When incel rapes a woman(which is also natural and happens among all animal kingdoms) everyone goes batshit crazy and incel is doomed to rot in jail
 
Why do you waste your time, energy, and braincells trying to reason with normies and IT cucks? Nothing will change their mind and yes most people don't care for the ills of others since it's not happening to them, also you're wasting yourself trying to get them to be honest as well. Human beings don't like being seen as evil, so they pretend to be good and taking the moral high ground. Find a good cope rather than spending your time trying to reason with people who think 2+2 =5.
This. Expecting ITcels to sympathize with us is like expecting the NKVD to sympathize with starving Ukrainian partisans. They hate us and enjoy our suffering.
 
I’m not saying it’s “right” but inceldom is a naturally occurring condition
I don’t look at my situation from a moral perspective. All I know is that no woman has a genetic insentive to view me as mating material. I only think in terms of ethics when normies take it a step farther and persecute genetic dead ends such as myself
In nature inceldom only occurs for sub2's usually. 4's and 5's aren't supposed to be genetic dead ends in nature, that's only because of feminism.
If incels don't have sex is natural selection, then people ER and CHO killed is a part of the natural selection

The holocaust was just natural selection bro
 
This. Expecting ITcels to sympathize with us is like expecting the NKVD to sympathize with starving Ukrainian partisans. They hate us and enjoy our suffering.
I wouldn't go so far as to say I expect any sort of positive responses from IT, however that doesn't stop me from calling out the double standards and various forms of dishonesty when I see them.
 
When incels can't have sex it is natural thing and perfectly normal.
When incel rapes a woman(which is also natural and happens among all animal kingdoms) everyone goes batshit crazy and incel is doomed to rot in jail
 
In nature inceldom only occurs for sub2's usually. 4's and 5's aren't supposed to be genetic dead ends in nature, that's only because of feminism.
Do you blame feminism for everything that you feel violated your sensibilities? Also 4s and 5s as you know them today wouldn’t exist if humanity stuck to the script. But instead they created civilizations and then cam arranged marriages and betabuxxing which lowered the quality of the gene pool
 
Do you blame feminism for everything that you feel violated your sensibilities? Also 4s and 5s as you know them today wouldn’t exist if humanity stuck to the script. But instead they created civilizations and then cam arranged marriages and betabuxxing which lowered the quality of the gene pool
By that logic 4 and 5 women wouldn't exist either. So they need to learn their place and fuck their 4 and 5 looksmatches instead of chasing chads like low iq cum bucket dirty cunts.
 
By that logic 4 and 5 women wouldn't exist either. So they need to learn their place and fuck their 4 and 5 looksmatches instead of chasing chads like low iq cum bucket dirty cunts.
Spoken like a man who doesn’t understand how sexual selection works
 
Spoken like a man who doesn’t understand how sexual selection works
If all men were chads, wouldn't there be 4 and 5 chads compared to the others? Face it, foids had no problem fucking their looksmatches in the past as long as they provided for them.
 
There are a lot of things to consider, chief among them would probably be the fact that despite the assertions of some, what we have right now isn't an example of a natural environment or sexual marketplace. While it's true that foids would naturally gravitate to the highest value male in her vicinity, that male wouldn't necessarily be the best looking, but rather the strongest and most capable. While these things are correlated, they're not the same. Keep in mind that in some sort of pre-agriculture tribe, it would be over for me anyway, just for different reasons, so I don't have anything to gain from stating this.

Also following from that, you have to remember that we've had sub 5 genes being passed down countless generations of men due to monogamy and civilization, not to mention that such concerns don't affect sub 5 females in the least.

The current situation is also in part a result of government policy. It's government that inflates female sexual marektplace value by banning prostitution. It's government that allows abortion, thereby allowing women to get away with being sluts. It's the government that gives women welfare. Etc etc.

Quite frankly if you're incel then it should be part of your political project to increase sexual freedom for men and decrease it for women. That's the only way the resource of female erotic capital can be shared fairly among the male population.
 

Similar threads

chowasright
Replies
16
Views
712
hansuilluo
hansuilluo
exposesociety
Replies
2
Views
502
Cryotron
Cryotron
ResidentHell
Replies
7
Views
753
Genetics_subhuman
Genetics_subhuman
antisocialcel
Replies
13
Views
161
BPJ
BPJ

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top