Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious It's becoming harder and harder to argue against cucktears

Dekim

Dekim

ricefevercel
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Posts
5,527
With so many good looking LARPers revealing themselves in the ratings megathread, it's becoming harder and harder to argue that we are incel due to looks and not personality.
 
The mentalcels will be our downfall. :feelsohh:
 
I don't agree.

0-3= truecel, over
4= borderline, feasible through lots of effort but unlikely
5-6= normie tier, feasible through some effort; mentalcels are here, since they don't try they get nothing, but would get if tried
7= Chadlite, already gets passive results to some extent
8 and up= Chad, wins by default

This is the rule of thumb. 5+ mentalcels are only incels because they don't try, or only try through means in which they aren't good-looking enough to succeed (Tinder for instance).
 
You would need a subhuman iq level to lose an argument to cucktears, just show them the atomic blackpill and the countless surveys/research papers that prove our point, and then watch as their head comes out their spijne to save muh females.
 
it will never be false that looks matter more than anything else
 
You would need a subhuman iq level to lose an argument to cucktears, just show them the atomic blackpill and the countless surveys/research papers that prove our point, and then watch as their head comes out their spijne to save muh females.
it will never be false that looks matter more than anything else
 
I think the requirements for male beauty have skyrocketed. Women are spoiled for choices.

Incels will be the norm soon enough.
 
I don't agree.

0-3= truecel, over
4= borderline, feasible through lots of effort but unlikely
5-6= normie tier, feasible through some effort; mentalcels are here, since they don't try they get nothing, but would get if tried
7= Chadlite, already gets passive results to some extent
8 and up= Chad, wins by default

This is the rule of thumb. 5+ mentalcels are only incels because they don't try, or only try through means in which they aren't good-looking enough to succeed (Tinder for instance).

It also seems like what constitutes "getting something" is really inconsistent and full of issues. The idea that looks don't matter or matter as much because women occasionally briefly settle for or hook up with 5-6 guys isn't really combatting the blackpill. There is some notion that because some women might settle for you if the stars are aligned then it was within your capability to keep her, much less have a fulfilling relationship. Also, just because some truecels may be so beaten down by desperation that such a life is desired, if they ever actually had it, they would feel as empty as they do now and would still be taking the blackpill.
 
I think the requirements for male beauty have skyrocketed. Women are spoiled for choices.

Incels will be the norm soon enough.
Seconding this. Being 5/10 with no other benefits will not get you a GF in 2018. Not even close. You have to be 7/10 facially minimum with no other halos (height, money, super-NT) to have a chance. At 5/10, you have to have the above halos just to have a shot.

If you see 4/10 or 5/10 men in the rating thread (I have a secret theory this is a containment thread but that's for another post), that's because that doesn't cut it anymore. It may have cut it 20 years ago, but not today. Not with feminism, tinder, or white knights inflating SMVs.
 
It also seems like what constitutes "getting something" is really inconsistent and full of issues.
I wholeheartedly agree. The lower your rate, the more inconsistent your results will be even if you manage to score something.

The idea that looks don't matter or matter as much because women occasionally briefly settle for or hook up with 5-6 guys isn't really combatting the blackpill.
Agreed. But it also ins't true that only 8+ guys see action.

I think most people here want amazing results without any effort (me too tbh), that's why they think like that. (Note: I'm not saying any guy can have success through effort, by effort I mean effort as a 5+ guy).

There is some notion that because some women might settle for you if the stars are aligned then it was within your capability to keep her, much less have a fulfilling relationship. Also, just because some truecels may be so beaten down by desperation that such a life is desired, if they ever actually had it, they would feel as empty as they do now and would still be taking the blackpill.
I disagree on that one. I think a lot of truecels would obviously not have all their problems fixed through sex/relationships/validation, but that would very likely have the potential to give them lifefuel to fix the other shit that might be wrong. Sex is a big part of life, some men get stuck on it and it causes lack of motivation for other stuff too.
 
I wholeheartedly agree. The lower your rate, the more inconsistent your results will be even if you manage to score something.


Agreed. But it also ins't true that only 8+ guys see action.

I think most people here want amazing results without any effort (me too tbh), that's why they think like that. (Note: I'm not saying any guy can have success through effort, by effort I mean effort as a 5+ guy).


I disagree on that one. I think a lot of truecels would obviously not have all their problems fixed through sex/relationships/validation, but that would very likely have the potential to give them lifefuel to fix the other shit that might be wrong. Sex is a big part of life, some men get stuck on it and it causes lack of motivation for other stuff too.

To the point you disagree on, I will concede that I am assuming a lot in my argument. For example, I look at someone like @catfishman23 and his past lays, yet I see why he identifies with the blackpill, if technically speaking he is not an incel. Just getting those hookups has left him feeling empty and unfulfilled. To your point though, his self esteem is almost certainly higher than that of a truecel's, so he would at least more resilient to feelings of roping or LDAR, which is worth something.
 
It's almost always new posters that don't stick around long revealing themselves, in other words, normies.
 
To the point you disagree on, I will concede that I am assuming a lot in my argument. For example, I look at someone like @catfishman23 and his past lays and I see why he feels like he identifies with the blackpill, if technically speaking he is not an incel. Just getting those hookups has left him feeling empty and unfulfilled. To your point though, his self esteem is almost certainly higher than that of a truecel's, so he would at least more resilient to feelings of roping or LDAR, which is worth something.
I think even people like @catfishman23 are still far from being truly sexually satisfied, even though he might have had some experiences.

I can see why people envy Chad so fucking much, Chad is the only one really getting quality and quantity nowadays. Even Chadlites don't get enough, my Chadlite friend faps like crazy, I already caught him doing it once, kek.

In order to be satisfied I think you need either a virgin, young, cute, great wife-material foid for LTR (pretty much impossible nowadays, even for Chad this is tricky tbh) or LOTS of sex with different quality (looks) girls.

~97% of men have neither.
 
You would need a subhuman iq level to lose an argument to cucktears, just show them the atomic blackpill and the countless surveys/research papers that prove our point, and then watch as their head comes out their spijne to save muh females.
This. Was legit getting angry trying to get them to see their hypocrisy when it comes to race.
 
With so many good looking LARPers revealing themselves in the ratings megathread, it's becoming harder and harder to argue that we are incel due to looks and not personality.
Regardless of the LARPers being good looking or not, the looks theory will never be defeated and there is much proof to back it.
 
blackpill archive. all you need.

notice how not ONE SINGLE blackpill thread gets posted. if it does, all they do is imitate in a silly manner rather than thoroughly debating the topic at hand. they are incompetent, unintelligent, and arrogant.
 
blackpill archive. all you need.

notice how not ONE SINGLE blackpill thread gets posted. if it does, all they do is imitate in a silly manner rather than thoroughly debating the topic at hand. they are incompetent, unintelligent, and arrogant.
"We must destroy those mysoginistic monsters for having opinions backed by evidence"
 
You would need a subhuman iq level to lose an argument to cucktears, just show them the atomic blackpill and the countless surveys/research papers that prove our point, and then watch as their head comes out their spijne to save muh females.
cope

they just call you incel and say bluepilled shit and look through your post history and its over
 
Cucktears are right about good looking fakers but wrong against actual incels™.
 
tbh tbh ngl ngl

they just look through your post history and say anything you say is invalid jfl@ that iq

i was arguing with some low iq retard about fortnite and he looked through my history and said i needed help

wtf?
 
CuckTears loses on the personality front too. Countless studies prove that women are attracted to bad behavior. A normie will slay with TRP advice, but will be lucky to betabux with IT advice.

They claim that misogyny is the reason we can't get laid, when tons of Chads are misogynistic. They're wrong in every regard and the actual causes of mentalceldom are autism, anxiety disorders, low testosterone, and bullshit feminist teachings.
 
Dunno why good looking people arent banned
 
I think the requirements for male beauty have skyrocketed. Women are spoiled for choices.

Incels will be the norm soon enough.
Can't tell if suifuel or lifefuel that other men will be brought down to our level :think:
 
Am I the only one who doesn't give af about CuckTears, and all the other soyboys and their shitty networks?
 
The problem is that even a 5-7/10 looks guy can still be locked out of sex by being too retarded to know how to properly approach, flirt, and escalate with foids. And being unable to get laid makes you incel.

It's only at the 8+ level where women start coming onto a man to the point where his own social skills don't matter.

And JFL @ thinking just be nice/confident bro works for average looking guys. There's more social maneuvering to it.
 
With so many good looking LARPers revealing themselves in the ratings megathread, it's becoming harder and harder to argue that we are incel due to looks and not personality.
>Arguing with haters.

1500318266760.jpg
 
I think the requirements for male beauty have skyrocketed. Women are spoiled for choices.

Incels will be the norm soon enough.
 
More than one way to end up incel. If anything, my situation only makes me hate more the men who froze me out of life growing up; still doesn't absolve foids of anything. If anyone, among countless individuals, had just been a little less of a cunt, I wouldn't be stuck in sexual poverty. Just needed a chance and could never get one. Something's wrong when Tinder works better than the immediate world.
 

Similar threads

NIKOCADO AVOCADO
Replies
13
Views
243
VintageCarCoper
VintageCarCoper
Grodd
Replies
35
Views
720
travis_bickle_
travis_bickle_
incelerated
Replies
6
Views
341
Schizoidcel
Schizoidcel
manletcel1488
Replies
10
Views
354
Pancakecel
Pancakecel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top