It makes so much sense when you think about it like this. An ITfag hates us for blaming women for things that are supposedly our own faults, and think we can't ascend because of our bad personality or other trivial stuff like showers. They think we're being entitled to the best of the best women.
We hate femcels because they're all fucking chad-only,not actual cels. I'll listen to these women and they'll be talking about how their ex-boyfriend was manipulative or something so they're now cels. JUST FUCKING LOL @ THAT. Like,nigga,your problems aren't real. You're just fucking chad only.
But femcels will never admit that. NEVER. AND THAT DRIVES ME FUCKING CRAZY.
And maybe this is how IT sees us. They think we think we're entitled to Stacies (wrong btw). They think we hate women because we don't get 10/10 blonde aryan Stacy sex maids. Honestly when you look at it like this I kinda understand why ITfags are so frustrated with us,because I harbor the same frustration for supposed femcels.
What IT doesn't realize though is the fact that the SMV of a truecel is so low that it's genuinely imperceptible to women and normie/Chad men. Hence why fem''cels'' claim to be truecels. ''I'm ugly so I can't get Chad. But I reject multiple men a week for being creepy or having bad personalities. I complain about getting unwanted male attention,which I got after I complained online about not getting male (chad) attention. That's truecel trait,right girls?''
They can't comprehend that their SMV is OMNIVERSES above a truecel's SMV.
Women on IT think this is the same for sub3 males. ''I know a sub3 girl,she got plenty of male attention,so why are sub3 men whining? You're all Stacy-only! Just looking for an excuse to be misogynists!'' is what a woman on IT unironically thinks. She can't comprehend how low a sub3 man's SMV is compared to a sub3 woman. Therefore she thinks we reject our looksmatches left and right.
Thoughts?
We hate femcels because they're all fucking chad-only,not actual cels. I'll listen to these women and they'll be talking about how their ex-boyfriend was manipulative or something so they're now cels. JUST FUCKING LOL @ THAT. Like,nigga,your problems aren't real. You're just fucking chad only.
But femcels will never admit that. NEVER. AND THAT DRIVES ME FUCKING CRAZY.
And maybe this is how IT sees us. They think we think we're entitled to Stacies (wrong btw). They think we hate women because we don't get 10/10 blonde aryan Stacy sex maids. Honestly when you look at it like this I kinda understand why ITfags are so frustrated with us,because I harbor the same frustration for supposed femcels.
What IT doesn't realize though is the fact that the SMV of a truecel is so low that it's genuinely imperceptible to women and normie/Chad men. Hence why fem''cels'' claim to be truecels. ''I'm ugly so I can't get Chad. But I reject multiple men a week for being creepy or having bad personalities. I complain about getting unwanted male attention,which I got after I complained online about not getting male (chad) attention. That's truecel trait,right girls?''
They can't comprehend that their SMV is OMNIVERSES above a truecel's SMV.
Women on IT think this is the same for sub3 males. ''I know a sub3 girl,she got plenty of male attention,so why are sub3 men whining? You're all Stacy-only! Just looking for an excuse to be misogynists!'' is what a woman on IT unironically thinks. She can't comprehend how low a sub3 man's SMV is compared to a sub3 woman. Therefore she thinks we reject our looksmatches left and right.
Thoughts?
stfu
