Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

It is Your Biological Duty to Impregnate Females

ItheIthe

ItheIthe

Legend
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
3,972
As a male, your evolutionary and biological impulse is to impregnate females and spread your seed. Each and every one of you is responsible for advancing our species. That is what you are here for. If you fail to do so, you are a failure. You have done nothing to pass on your genes and keep your bloodline in tact. You are among lowest form of life there is.

However, because the purpose of existing is to pass on our genes and advance your species, the true alpha male is the male who has the most children. He did the most to advance our species. Morals are real, because we need them to function as a unit. However, morals do not apply to females, as they are evil and cold-hearted, as well as good for nothing. They are biologically inferior to us, and we, as morally, emotionally, and physically superior, are free to do what we please with them, as we would with any other species we dominate, such as cattle or oxen. Since females are only good for reproduction, there is morally nothing wrong with raping a female - as long as you don't pull out - to ensure you do your biological responsibility and pass on your genes. This is not only okay to do, it is your biological responsibility. The only exceptions are: 1. A female in a "relationship" because societies function better without adultery, and 2. Virgin females because they are extra valuable for a "relationship". All other females are in bounds.

Once again, females are biologically inferior to males. Males are good at all the physical labor that is required to uphold infrastructure and housing. Women are not. Men have made virtually all the advances in science and technology. Women have not. Men have many productive hobbies and interests. The only thing women do is try to seduce males. That is proof that being used for reproduction is their only purpose. In third world countries, especially African ones entrenched in wars, rape happens all the time and no one gives a fuck. Society here only pretends to give a fuck because we pretend to be romantically monogamous. But we're not, the average female has like 30+ partners lifetime and therefore has romantic value. The only thing it is good for is passing on genes. There's nothing wrong with the rape of these females.

I'm not saying I'm going to rape a female, I'm just saying there's nothing wrong with it, since females are unworthy of us. I would not only say that rape is acceptable, I'd actually encourage it as your biological and primitive responsibility to rape a female and advance our species, as long as that female fits those brief conditions.
 
Last edited:
Materialism is gay.
 
Rape isn't even a big deal, they just get upset because it wasn't Chad or Tyrone doing the raping.
 
High IQ, this is perfectly logical to me
 
1495050932448
 
I don't see passing on your genes as something inherently valuable tbh
 
Why have women discovered pretty much nothing for humanity? Feminists say it's bcuz opression, I say it's because they just aren't interested in that. They simply care about Chad and not much more. Men on the other hand (maybe because many are born ugly?) want to fulfill themselves in other ways.

Females are the most egocentric and hateful beings on the planet. Their goal is to get Chad, get babies and pass them. If you get in the way of their plans they'll try to destroy you and they will wish you death. If you aren't chad and you don't help a female economically then she does despise you.

I don't think rape is good morally, and biology simply decided females had to have the sexual power and not men (unless Chad) and of course there's selection mechanisms. It happens in all nature not just humans. I'm okay with not joining their chase-chad game and benefitting off them whenever possible. Men of the past couldn't be more right: women are powerful creatures programmed by biology to look for the best mate.

Quotes by napoleon:

"The weakness of women’s brains, the instability of their ideas . . . their need for perpetual resignation . . . all this can be met only by religion."
-- Note on the State School for Girls at Ecouen, 1807

"Women . . . should not be regarded as the equals of men; they are, in fact, mere machines to make children."
-- Conversation, 1817

"We treat women too well, and in this way have spoiled everything. We have done every wrong by raising them to our level. Truly the Oriental nations have more mind and sense than we in declaring the wife to be the actual property of the husband. In fact nature has made woman our slave. . . . Woman is given to man that she may bear children . . . consequently she is his property, just as a fruit tree is the property of the gardener."
-- Memoirs


Truly a war genius with some interesting thoughts and who was ahead of his time, imo.
 
Same for me mate I am Starving to spread my genes (ugly genes)
 
i'd remain incel for the rest of my life before I ever rape a foid. Foids are a lesser lifeform yes...but rape is still one of the most depraved acts you can inflict upon another...beyond morally reprehensible

i'll go spread my genes by submitting some nut to a sperm bank. but yet again my lineage doesn't even deserve to continue so I'd never do such a thing in the first place
 
i'd remain incel for the rest of my life before I ever rape a foid. Foids are a lesser lifeform yes...but rape is still one of the most depraved acts you can inflict upon another...beyond morally reprehensible
:soy:

What's the point of dehumanizing the enemy if you don't want to abuse them? I think foids can count themselves lucky if all they get from an incel is rape. That is, unless foids would prefer death to having an incel touch them.
 
Last edited:
Maybe you should follow itsOVER's example, OP.
 
Why have women discovered pretty much nothing for humanity? Feminists say it's bcuz opression, I say it's because they just aren't interested in that. They simply care about Chad and not much more. Men on the other hand (maybe because many are born ugly?) want to fulfill themselves in other ways.

Females are the most egocentric and hateful beings on the planet. Their goal is to get Chad, get babies and pass them. If you get in the way of their plans they'll try to destroy you and they will wish you death. If you aren't chad and you don't help a female economically then she does despise you.

I don't think rape is good morally, and biology simply decided females had to have the sexual power and not men (unless Chad) and of course there's selection mechanisms. It happens in all nature not just humans. I'm okay with not joining their chase-chad game and benefitting off them whenever possible. Men of the past couldn't be more right: women are powerful creatures programmed by biology to look for the best mate.

Quotes by napoleon:

"The weakness of women’s brains, the instability of their ideas . . . their need for perpetual resignation . . . all this can be met only by religion."
-- Note on the State School for Girls at Ecouen, 1807

"Women . . . should not be regarded as the equals of men; they are, in fact, mere machines to make children."
-- Conversation, 1817

"We treat women too well, and in this way have spoiled everything. We have done every wrong by raising them to our level. Truly the Oriental nations have more mind and sense than we in declaring the wife to be the actual property of the husband. In fact nature has made woman our slave. . . . Woman is given to man that she may bear children . . . consequently she is his property, just as a fruit tree is the property of the gardener."
-- Memoirs


Truly a war genius with some interesting thoughts and who was ahead of his time, imo.
Totally agree, mate. Women were designed to choose mates, it’s biologically in their DNA to look for traits that indicate good genes, but it’s just that the average modern woman today is infuriatingly shallow and chases Chads, leaving us DNA-deficient fuckers behind.
 
Donate your sperm to a sperm bank. That's what I'm going to do.
 
Donate your sperm to a sperm bank. That's what I'm going to do.

Sperm donors with in-demand sperm are the biggest evolutionary winners since they will have the most heirs (possibly into the hundreds or even thousands). And all they had to do was masturbate a few times.
 
As a male, your evolutionary and biological impulse is to impregnate females and spread your seed. Each and every one of you is responsible for advancing our species. That is what you are here for. If you fail to do so, you are a failure. You have done nothing to pass on your genes and keep your bloodline in tact. You are among lowest form of life there is.

You are just another "appeal to nature" massive cuck. life has no meaning nor purpose nor defined direction. I am not responsible for anything nor I owe myself to any stupìd pointless duty.

Come back when you are truly blackpilled.
 
As a male, your evolutionary and biological impulse is to impregnate females and spread your seed. Each and every one of you is responsible for advancing our species. That is what you are here for. If you fail to do so, you are a failure. You have done nothing to pass on your genes and keep your bloodline in tact. You are among lowest form of life there is.

However, because the purpose of existing is to pass on our genes and advance your species, the true alpha male is the male who has the most children. He did the most to advance our species. Morals are real, because we need them to function as a unit. However, morals do not apply to females, as they are evil and cold-hearted, as well as good for nothing. They are biologically inferior to us, and we, as morally, emotionally, and physically superior, are free to do what we please with them, as we would with any other species we dominate, such as cattle or oxen. Since females are only good for reproduction, there is morally nothing wrong with raping a female - as long as you don't pull out - to ensure you do your biological responsibility and pass on your genes. This is not only okay to do, it is your biological responsibility. The only exceptions are: 1. A female in a "relationship" because societies function better without adultery, and 2. Virgin females because they are extra valuable for a "relationship". All other females are in bounds.

Once again, females are biologically inferior to males. Males are good at all the physical labor that is required to uphold infrastructure and housing. Women are not. Men have made virtually all the advances in science and technology. Women have not. Men have many productive hobbies and interests. The only thing women do is try to seduce males. That is proof that being used for reproduction is their only purpose. In third world countries, especially African ones entrenched in wars, rape happens all the time and no one gives a fuck. Society here only pretends to give a fuck because we pretend to be romantically monogamous. But we're not, the average female has like 30+ partners lifetime and therefore has romantic value. The only thing it is good for is passing on genes. There's nothing wrong with the rape of these females.

I'm not saying I'm going to rape a female, I'm just saying there's nothing wrong with it, since females are unworthy of us. I would not only say that rape is acceptable, I'd actually encourage it as your biological and primitive responsibility to rape a female and advance our species, as long as that female fits those brief conditions.

It is your duty to pass your genes granted you have the opportunity. The reason incels exist according to evolutionary biology is simply because they are cucked by Chad due to his outstanding genetics i.e. survival of the fittest according to Darwin.

Incels inability to compete with Chad tier genetics == women selecting to procreate with Chad == Incel inability to procreate == natural selection == survival of the fittest. Day 1 stuff dude.

As far as your autistic rant about raping women just LDAR bro let your inferior genetics end with you if you can't out compete Chad in this cuck or be cucked world we live in. Women have to survive 9 months to birth a child, the refractory period after men ejaculate and spike in prolactin, numbs their reward system by dropping dopamine levels = men temporarily stop being horny and the oxytocin release encourages bonding between man and women, this man is inclined to protect women from Intruders that threaten the birth of their child and to raise the child until they can fend for themselves thus completing of passing on of their DNA.

/Thread
 
It is your duty to pass your genes granted you have the opportunity. The reason incels exist according to evolutionary biology is simply because they are cucked by Chad due to his outstanding genetics i.e. survival of the fittest according to Darwin.

Incels inability to compete with Chad tier genetics == women selecting to procreate with Chad == Incel inability to procreate == natural selection == survival of the fittest. Day 1 stuff dude.

As far as your autistic rant about raping women just LDAR bro let your inferior genetics end with you if you can't out compete Chad in this cuck or be cucked world we live in. Women have to survive 9 months to birth a child, the refractory period after men ejaculate and spike in prolactin, numbs their reward system by dropping dopamine levels = men temporarily stop being horny and the oxytocin release encourages bonding between man and women, this man is inclined to protect women from Intruders that threaten the birth of their child and to raise the child until they can fend for themselves thus completing of passing on of their DNA.

/Thread

It's not survival of the fittest.

In humans it's survival of those with the least inhibition.
 
It's not survival of the fittest.

In humans it's survival of those with the least inhibition.

Can you expand on this line of reasoning? How is this incompatible with the notion of survival of the fittest if natural selection is selecting for humans with least inhibition, to procreate?

This seems in line with the theory of evolution, those who adapted to low inhibition passed those genes to their offspring who now start off as an evolved low inhibition human (generally speaking, mutations can cause low inhib and then the survival of those genes get passed down to future generations, etc). Then we have those with high inhibition (incels) that are getting weeded out of the gene pool.

Cuck or be cucked. Mother nature is a bitch.
 
Last edited:
I’m not advocating rape, but you do have books like 50 shades of grey being the number one top seller in the world
 
As a male, your evolutionary and biological impulse is to impregnate females and spread your seed. Each and every one of you is responsible for advancing our species. That is what you are here for. If you fail to do so, you are a failure. You have done nothing to pass on your genes and keep your bloodline in tact. You are among lowest form of life there is.

However, because the purpose of existing is to pass on our genes and advance your species, the true alpha male is the male who has the most children. He did the most to advance our species. Morals are real, because we need them to function as a unit. However, morals do not apply to females, as they are evil and cold-hearted, as well as good for nothing. They are biologically inferior to us, and we, as morally, emotionally, and physically superior, are free to do what we please with them, as we would with any other species we dominate, such as cattle or oxen. Since females are only good for reproduction, there is morally nothing wrong with raping a female - as long as you don't pull out - to ensure you do your biological responsibility and pass on your genes. This is not only okay to do, it is your biological responsibility. The only exceptions are: 1. A female in a "relationship" because societies function better without adultery, and 2. Virgin females because they are extra valuable for a "relationship". All other females are in bounds.

Once again, females are biologically inferior to males. Males are good at all the physical labor that is required to uphold infrastructure and housing. Women are not. Men have made virtually all the advances in science and technology. Women have not. Men have many productive hobbies and interests. The only thing women do is try to seduce males. That is proof that being used for reproduction is their only purpose. In third world countries, especially African ones entrenched in wars, rape happens all the time and no one gives a fuck. Society here only pretends to give a fuck because we pretend to be romantically monogamous. But we're not, the average female has like 30+ partners lifetime and therefore has romantic value. The only thing it is good for is passing on genes. There's nothing wrong with the rape of these females.

I'm not saying I'm going to rape a female, I'm just saying there's nothing wrong with it, since females are unworthy of us. I would not only say that rape is acceptable, I'd actually encourage it as your biological and primitive responsibility to rape a female and advance our species, as long as that female fits those brief conditions.
So since we are superior to dogs it morally ok to rape them? I hate how cucks hold women on a pedestal but it's stupid to justify rape by saying you are better then someone, if you are truly desperate then hire a prostitute. I refuse to stoop down to the degeneracy of rape. I'd like to see you go to everyone who has had a daughter and tell them you have the right to rape there child. Call me bluepilled but I dont think that being superior to someone justifies defiling them.
 
Last edited:
I’m not advocating rape, but you do have books like 50 shades of grey being the number one top seller in the world

Rmr it's not rape if you're a Chad or facially blessed, it's a kink and fantasy ;)
 
So since we are superior to dogs it morally ok to rape them? I hate how cucks hold women on a pedestal but it's stupid to justify rape by saying you are better then someone, if you are truly desperate then hire a prostitute. I refuse to stoop down to the degeneracy of rape. I'd like to see you go to everyone who has had a daughter and tell them you have the right to rape there child. Call me bluepilled but I dont think that being superior to someone justifies defiling them.
Women are property and whatever happens to them does not matter. Their sole purpose for existing is to bear children. Nothing else.
 
Women are property and whatever happens to them does not matter. Their sole purpose for existing is to bear children. Nothing else.
No shit, but the sole purpose of men are to provide for themselves and family so they can have children, i know that Men are generally superior. You said it yourself the purpose of women is to bear children and not to just be raped for pleasure, that's degeneracy. I believe we should live in a society where everyone can get there looks match when looking for a partner, not a society where any fuck can rape the women of there choosing without a relationship or straight up paying for the sex, any average IQ person knows that you if you could just grab what you want because then the physically fit Chad's would still get all the attractive women and rape them while incels wouldnt get anything good.
 
Last edited:
If rape was legal it would be definitely better for us. Currently chad and high status men are using law against to keep their women and women using it to give advances to psycho high status men or chad. Women are far from making rational decisions and stopping our right to reproduce. It is clearly seen their choice of men is not even good for the society.
 
No shit, but the sole purpose of men are to provide for themselves and family so they can have children, i know that Men are generally superior. You said it yourself the purpose of women is to bear children and not to just be raped for pleasure, that's degeneracy. I believe we should live in a society where everyone can get there looks match when looking for a partner, not a society where any fuck can rape the women of there choosing without a relationship or straight up paying for the sex, any average IQ person knows that you if you could just grab what you want because then the physically fit Chad's would still get all the attractive women and rape them while incels wouldnt get anything good.
While degeneracy is real, our society is far too gone for it to matter. Strict monogamy is superior, but "monogamy" with females have already been defiled by numerous men is just a pointless joke.
 
It's amazing how many lowIQcels think that they're smart.

fucking cavedwelling-height knowledge of biology in this thread
 
While degeneracy is real, our society is far too gone for it to matter. Strict monogamy is superior, but "monogamy" with females have already been defiled by numerous men is just a pointless joke.
It could always go further, transgender supremacy is just around the corner.
 
I don't see passing on your genes as something inherently valuable tbh
It is desirable by any normal functioning men. At a certain age your hormones affect you to do it.
 
Good thread. I agree.
 
Been lurking for a while in the forum, and this is the lowest IQ post I've seen. Extremely low.
 
Kill yourself.
High IQ response as well. Why don't you just go out and rape/kill everyone? You have it all justified it seems. You truly are not blackpilled enough, as someone mentioned above.
 
High IQ response as well. Why don't you just go out and rape/kill everyone? You have it all justified it seems. You truly are not blackpilled enough, as someone mentioned above.
Killing is immoral except in certain situations. Killing you would be justified though, just like the Spartans killed the physically and me tally handicapped. You're too dumb to serve a purpose and are therefore a waste of resources.
 
Killing is immoral except in certain situations. Killing you would be justified though, just like the Spartans killed the physically and me tally handicapped. You're too dumb to serve a purpose and are therefore a waste of resources.

You want to kill me because I disagreed with your post, and somehow now I am a waste of resources because of that. I am also someone who doesn't serve a purpose, it seems. Very easy to say stuff through a monitor. Just tells me how much real life interaction you have. You have no hope, good luck though.
 
You want to kill me because I disagreed with your post, and somehow now I am a waste of resources because of that. I am also someone who doesn't serve a purpose, it seems. Very easy to say stuff through a monitor. Just tells me how much real life interaction you have. You have no hope, good luck though.
Guarantee i have more real life interaction than you. My posts on this thread in no way indicate what type of interactions i have in the real world, nor are they indicative if how frequently i interact, you faggoty moron.
 
Guarantee i have more real life interaction than you. My posts on this thread in no way indicate what type of interactions i have in the real world, nor are they indicative if how frequently i interact, you faggoty moron.

Now you are trying so hard to prove yourself, haha. I think I touched some buttons on you. It's fine, I don't really have anything against you, wish you luck.
 
If anyone is really trying to rape a female lol try my crush who has been a bitch lately, but she’s probably been used hundreds of times by chad
 
Evo Psych, Incel Edition: “It’s your biological responsibility to rape a female and advance our species”
AUGUST 7, 2018

· 101 COMMENTS

fycu7tvgy8ihuoiuh.jpg

Keep your sperm to yourself, you pieces of shit

By David Futrelle

Evolutionary Psychology is a problematic discipline to begin with, relying heavily on simplistic evolutionary “just-so” stories that for some mysterious reason always seem to reinforce the most reactionary notions about gender and human nature.

But if you add a dollop of incel ideology to the Evo Psych stew, you get something truly horrifying. Over on the Incels.me forum — a reliably repugnant forum popular with some of the world’s worst “involuntary celibates” — one commenter recently tried to use evolutionary biology to explain why rape was not only justified but something close to a sacred duty for all men who want to “advance our species.”

“It is Your Biological Duty to Impregnate Females,” ItheIthe began.

As a male, your evolutionary and biological impulse is to impregnate females and spread your seed. Each and every one of you is responsible for advancing our species. That is what you are here for. If you fail to do so … [y]ou have done nothing to pass on your genes … You are among lowest form of life there is.​
Weird, because there are plenty of people who have contributed mightily to human civilization without ever having kids, including Jane Austen, Susan B. Anthony, Beethoven, Leonardo Da Vinci, Isaac Newton, Debbie Harry, Haruki Murakami, and, er, Betty White, to name just a few on this giant list I found after literally ten seconds of Googling.

Also, what the fuck does it matter if you “advance our species” or not? Live the best life you can. Try to be decent to other people and nice to pets and other animals. Life is tough enough; don’t burden yourself with weird and grandiose expectations on top of everything else.

However, because the purpose of existing is to pass on our genes and advance your species, the true alpha male is the male who has the most children. He did the most to advance our species.​
Donald Trump has five kids (that we know of). Neither he nor any of his terrible children are doing anything to “advance our species.” (Barron might turn out ok; we don’t know yet.) Indeed, there’s a good case that he’s dramatically increased the risk that our species might destroy itself and much of the world with it through nuclear war and/or unchecked global warming. His ignorant recklessness is one of the main reasons the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists’ Doomsday clock is now set to the truly scary two minutes to midnight.

Up until this point, ItheIthe has mostly just been wrong. But his argument is about to get very, very ugly as well.

Morals are real, because we need them to function as a unit. However, morals do not apply to females, as they are evil and cold-hearted, as well as good for nothing.​
ItheIthe went back on that last bit pretty quickly after he remembered where babies come from. But first:

They are biologically inferior to us, and we, as morally, emotionally, and physically superior, are free to do what we please with them, as we would with any other species we dominate, such as cattle or oxen.​
It’s a little hard to take someone’s “science” seriously when he thinks women are somehow a different and inferior species from men.

Since females are only good for reproduction, there is morally nothing wrong with raping a female – as long as you don’t pull out – to ensure you do your biological responsibility and pass on your genes.​
Well, that’s horrifying, but at least he remembered the basic facts of reproduction (even if he has forgotten about the existence of trans women and infertile people).

This is not only okay to do, it is your biological responsibility. The only exceptions are: 1. A female in a “relationship” because societies function better without adultery, and 2. Virgin females because they are extra valuable for a “relationship”. All other females are in bounds.​
I guess traditionalists can feel grateful he’s remembered that whole “virgin/whore” dichotomy.

Once again, females are biologically inferior to males. Males are good at all the physical labor that is required to uphold infrastructure and housing. Women are not. Men have made virtually all the advances in science and technology. Women have not. Men have many productive hobbies and interests. The only thing women do is try to seduce males.​
At this point I’m pretty sure he’s never talked to a woman outside of his family, or cracked a book outside of a math textbook or video game guide.

That is proof that being used for reproduction is their only purpose. In third world countries, especially African ones entrenched in wars, rape happens all the time and no one gives a fuck.​
There are people in all countries — rich or poor, peaceful or war-torn — with some pretty fucked-up ideas about rape; hell, our shithead president brags about sexual assault. But there is no society on earth in which “no one gives a fuck.”

Society here only pretends to give a fuck because we pretend to be romantically monogamous. But we’re not, the average female has like 30+ partners lifetime and therefore has romantic value.​
I think there must be a word missing at the end. Surely he doesn’t think women have any “romantic value,” whatever that means.

More to the point, the average American woman doesn’t have dozens of sexual partners over her lifetime (not that there’s anything wrong with that). As I pointed out only a month ago in a slightly different context, incels and MGTOWs and other misogynistic douchebags tens to wildly overestimate how many partners women have. In fact, according to the CBC,, the median number of (opposite sex) partners that American women between 25 and 44 had over their lifetimes (as of 2011-2015) was 4.2; men had 6.1.

Virtually everything these guys think they know about female sexuality stems from fantasies rooted in misogyny and their own insecurity.

The only thing it is good for is passing on genes. There’s nothing wrong with the rape of these females.​
Referring to a woman as “it” — the cherry pit on top of this incel shit sundae.

I’m not saying I’m going to rape a female, I’m just saying there’s nothing wrong with it, since females are unworthy of us.​
Says someone whose biggest accomplishment in life is posting 3,993 messages on Incels.me under a fake name.

I would not only say that rape is acceptable, I’d actually encourage it as your biological and primitive responsibility to rape a female and advance our species, as long as that female fits those brief conditions.​
And on this thoroughly reprehensible note, ItheIthe’s wrapped up his latest contribution to the advancement of the human species.

ItheIthe’s argument got a mixed response from his fellow incels. While some commenters hailed it as “high IQ” brilliance, others dismissed it as the “autistic rant” of a cuck with an extremely poor understanding of biology.

“The reason incels exist according to evolutionary biology is simply because they are cucked by Chad due to his outstanding genetics i.e. survival of the fittest according to Darwin,” wrote warriorgenetics, perhaps the harshest critic.

As far as your autistic rant about raping women just LDAR [Lie Down and Rot] bro let your inferior genetics end with you if you can’t out compete Chad in this cuck or be cucked world we live in.​
But others found ItheIthe’s post, well, inspiring.

“If rape was legal it would be definitely better for us,” wrote someone called mentalcel.

Currently chad and high status men are using law against to keep their women … Women are far from making rational decisions … their choice of men is not even good for the society.​
“Rape isn’t even a big deal,” wrote armis, “they just get upset because it wasn’t Chad or Tyrone doing the raping.”

“What’s the point of dehumanizing the enemy if you don’t want to abuse them?” asked Atavistic Autist.

I think foids can count themselves lucky if all they get from an incel is rape. That is, unless foids would prefer death to having an incel touch them.​
While more than a few of the commenters blanched at the idea of rape, some of them still found ItheIthe’s assessment of women persuasive.

Someone called engineerescortceller declared flat out that he didn’t think rape was “good morally” But at the same time he agreed with ItheIthe that “females”

simply care about Chad and not much more. Men on the other hand (maybe because many are born ugly?) want to fulfill themselves in other ways.
Females are the most egocentric and hateful beings on the planet. Their goal is to get Chad, get babies and pass them. If you get in the way of their plans they’ll try to destroy you and they will wish you death.​
I believe that’s what the regular psychologists would call “projection.” Hatred and self-loathing are a terrible mix — and the incel movement is an amplifier of both.

1517649272715.gif
Cucc
1517649272715.gif
Cucc
1517649272715.gif
Cucc
1517649272715.gif
Cucc
1517649272715.gif
 
Evo Psych, Incel Edition: “It’s your biological responsibility to rape a female and advance our species”
AUGUST 7, 2018

· 101 COMMENTS

fycu7tvgy8ihuoiuh.jpg

Keep your sperm to yourself, you pieces of shit

By David Futrelle

Evolutionary Psychology is a problematic discipline to begin with, relying heavily on simplistic evolutionary “just-so” stories that for some mysterious reason always seem to reinforce the most reactionary notions about gender and human nature.

But if you add a dollop of incel ideology to the Evo Psych stew, you get something truly horrifying. Over on the Incels.me forum — a reliably repugnant forum popular with some of the world’s worst “involuntary celibates” — one commenter recently tried to use evolutionary biology to explain why rape was not only justified but something close to a sacred duty for all men who want to “advance our species.”

“It is Your Biological Duty to Impregnate Females,” ItheIthe began.

As a male, your evolutionary and biological impulse is to impregnate females and spread your seed. Each and every one of you is responsible for advancing our species. That is what you are here for. If you fail to do so … [y]ou have done nothing to pass on your genes … You are among lowest form of life there is.​
Weird, because there are plenty of people who have contributed mightily to human civilization without ever having kids, including Jane Austen, Susan B. Anthony, Beethoven, Leonardo Da Vinci, Isaac Newton, Debbie Harry, Haruki Murakami, and, er, Betty White, to name just a few on this giant list I found after literally ten seconds of Googling.

Also, what the fuck does it matter if you “advance our species” or not? Live the best life you can. Try to be decent to other people and nice to pets and other animals. Life is tough enough; don’t burden yourself with weird and grandiose expectations on top of everything else.

However, because the purpose of existing is to pass on our genes and advance your species, the true alpha male is the male who has the most children. He did the most to advance our species.​
Donald Trump has five kids (that we know of). Neither he nor any of his terrible children are doing anything to “advance our species.” (Barron might turn out ok; we don’t know yet.) Indeed, there’s a good case that he’s dramatically increased the risk that our species might destroy itself and much of the world with it through nuclear war and/or unchecked global warming. His ignorant recklessness is one of the main reasons the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists’ Doomsday clock is now set to the truly scary two minutes to midnight.

Up until this point, ItheIthe has mostly just been wrong. But his argument is about to get very, very ugly as well.

Morals are real, because we need them to function as a unit. However, morals do not apply to females, as they are evil and cold-hearted, as well as good for nothing.​
ItheIthe went back on that last bit pretty quickly after he remembered where babies come from. But first:

They are biologically inferior to us, and we, as morally, emotionally, and physically superior, are free to do what we please with them, as we would with any other species we dominate, such as cattle or oxen.​
It’s a little hard to take someone’s “science” seriously when he thinks women are somehow a different and inferior species from men.

Since females are only good for reproduction, there is morally nothing wrong with raping a female – as long as you don’t pull out – to ensure you do your biological responsibility and pass on your genes.​
Well, that’s horrifying, but at least he remembered the basic facts of reproduction (even if he has forgotten about the existence of trans women and infertile people).

This is not only okay to do, it is your biological responsibility. The only exceptions are: 1. A female in a “relationship” because societies function better without adultery, and 2. Virgin females because they are extra valuable for a “relationship”. All other females are in bounds.​
I guess traditionalists can feel grateful he’s remembered that whole “virgin/whore” dichotomy.

Once again, females are biologically inferior to males. Males are good at all the physical labor that is required to uphold infrastructure and housing. Women are not. Men have made virtually all the advances in science and technology. Women have not. Men have many productive hobbies and interests. The only thing women do is try to seduce males.​
At this point I’m pretty sure he’s never talked to a woman outside of his family, or cracked a book outside of a math textbook or video game guide.

That is proof that being used for reproduction is their only purpose. In third world countries, especially African ones entrenched in wars, rape happens all the time and no one gives a fuck.​
There are people in all countries — rich or poor, peaceful or war-torn — with some pretty fucked-up ideas about rape; hell, our shithead president brags about sexual assault. But there is no society on earth in which “no one gives a fuck.”

Society here only pretends to give a fuck because we pretend to be romantically monogamous. But we’re not, the average female has like 30+ partners lifetime and therefore has romantic value.​
I think there must be a word missing at the end. Surely he doesn’t think women have any “romantic value,” whatever that means.

More to the point, the average American woman doesn’t have dozens of sexual partners over her lifetime (not that there’s anything wrong with that). As I pointed out only a month ago in a slightly different context, incels and MGTOWs and other misogynistic douchebags tens to wildly overestimate how many partners women have. In fact, according to the CBC,, the median number of (opposite sex) partners that American women between 25 and 44 had over their lifetimes (as of 2011-2015) was 4.2; men had 6.1.

Virtually everything these guys think they know about female sexuality stems from fantasies rooted in misogyny and their own insecurity.

The only thing it is good for is passing on genes. There’s nothing wrong with the rape of these females.​
Referring to a woman as “it” — the cherry pit on top of this incel shit sundae.

I’m not saying I’m going to rape a female, I’m just saying there’s nothing wrong with it, since females are unworthy of us.​
Says someone whose biggest accomplishment in life is posting 3,993 messages on Incels.me under a fake name.

I would not only say that rape is acceptable, I’d actually encourage it as your biological and primitive responsibility to rape a female and advance our species, as long as that female fits those brief conditions.​
And on this thoroughly reprehensible note, ItheIthe’s wrapped up his latest contribution to the advancement of the human species.

ItheIthe’s argument got a mixed response from his fellow incels. While some commenters hailed it as “high IQ” brilliance, others dismissed it as the “autistic rant” of a cuck with an extremely poor understanding of biology.

“The reason incels exist according to evolutionary biology is simply because they are cucked by Chad due to his outstanding genetics i.e. survival of the fittest according to Darwin,” wrote warriorgenetics, perhaps the harshest critic.

As far as your autistic rant about raping women just LDAR [Lie Down and Rot] bro let your inferior genetics end with you if you can’t out compete Chad in this cuck or be cucked world we live in.​
But others found ItheIthe’s post, well, inspiring.

“If rape was legal it would be definitely better for us,” wrote someone called mentalcel.

Currently chad and high status men are using law against to keep their women … Women are far from making rational decisions … their choice of men is not even good for the society.​
“Rape isn’t even a big deal,” wrote armis, “they just get upset because it wasn’t Chad or Tyrone doing the raping.”

“What’s the point of dehumanizing the enemy if you don’t want to abuse them?” asked Atavistic Autist.

I think foids can count themselves lucky if all they get from an incel is rape. That is, unless foids would prefer death to having an incel touch them.​
While more than a few of the commenters blanched at the idea of rape, some of them still found ItheIthe’s assessment of women persuasive.

Someone called engineerescortceller declared flat out that he didn’t think rape was “good morally” But at the same time he agreed with ItheIthe that “females”

simply care about Chad and not much more. Men on the other hand (maybe because many are born ugly?) want to fulfill themselves in other ways.​

Females are the most egocentric and hateful beings on the planet. Their goal is to get Chad, get babies and pass them. If you get in the way of their plans they’ll try to destroy you and they will wish you death.​
I believe that’s what the regular psychologists would call “projection.” Hatred and self-loathing are a terrible mix — and the incel movement is an amplifier of both.


206
 
I wonder if IT cucks will take the bait.
 

Similar threads

AutistSupremacist
Replies
6
Views
227
adharmi
adharmi
Apex.Koala
Replies
10
Views
254
Izayacel
Izayacel
B33troot
Replies
12
Views
476
Abou Baldiaby
Abou Baldiaby
WideW
Replies
2
Views
337
Aquiline
Aquiline

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top