L
It is a complete lie.
Back then money/financial stability mattered.
Now money is redundant for whores when they a) "outperform" the men of their age in the regular jobs (outperform in big quotation marks because our gynocratic system puts men into shackles while shoving money/education/etc. in the greedy mouth of femoids, when you fail as a woman you deliberately failed by studying a meme degree which is the equivalent of putting yourself in a wheelchair despite functioning legs and then wondering why you cannot come up the stairs, also HR of course which employs chads/trannies/women while leaving out regular men - especially if non-NT) and b) have a money printing device between their legs as a fail-safe mechanism.
Now that money is unimportant, the seen variance in dating success is only explained by the variance in looks/neurotypicality. This is also why inceldom is so high in Northern countries like Sweden/Finnland/Norway/Germany, where you have enormously good living standards and a social welfare system that guarantees not only basal survival, but a decent life.
A simple mathematical modell:
Vo = Vs + Vl + Vnt --> Vo: observable variance in dating success, Vs: variance in status (which means money, education, etc.), Vl: variance in looks (face, frame, height, etc.), Vnt: variance in neurotypicality
Now that Vs ≈ 0 --> Vo ≈ Vl + Vnt ---> without the influence of money the only traits that matter are neurotypicality and looks
A working man with a car could have gotten a GF back in the day easily, nowadays your work doesn't matter, which means NT chad only over time (because all limits for hypergamy have been removed). In the moment where you remove one factor the influence of other factors increases.
Back then money/financial stability mattered.
Now money is redundant for whores when they a) "outperform" the men of their age in the regular jobs (outperform in big quotation marks because our gynocratic system puts men into shackles while shoving money/education/etc. in the greedy mouth of femoids, when you fail as a woman you deliberately failed by studying a meme degree which is the equivalent of putting yourself in a wheelchair despite functioning legs and then wondering why you cannot come up the stairs, also HR of course which employs chads/trannies/women while leaving out regular men - especially if non-NT) and b) have a money printing device between their legs as a fail-safe mechanism.
Now that money is unimportant, the seen variance in dating success is only explained by the variance in looks/neurotypicality. This is also why inceldom is so high in Northern countries like Sweden/Finnland/Norway/Germany, where you have enormously good living standards and a social welfare system that guarantees not only basal survival, but a decent life.
A simple mathematical modell:
Vo = Vs + Vl + Vnt --> Vo: observable variance in dating success, Vs: variance in status (which means money, education, etc.), Vl: variance in looks (face, frame, height, etc.), Vnt: variance in neurotypicality
Now that Vs ≈ 0 --> Vo ≈ Vl + Vnt ---> without the influence of money the only traits that matter are neurotypicality and looks
A working man with a car could have gotten a GF back in the day easily, nowadays your work doesn't matter, which means NT chad only over time (because all limits for hypergamy have been removed). In the moment where you remove one factor the influence of other factors increases.
Last edited:
