Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Israel Tied Up Captured Palestinians by the Arms and Legs and then Forced Them to Wear Diapers

ALifeWastedOnRot

ALifeWastedOnRot

Veteran
★★★
Joined
May 16, 2025
Posts
1,279
Israel would capture Palestinians and handcuff them to hospital beds. They would make them wear diapers and wouldn't change them for days, letting shit pile up. Then when they change them they would do it in front of everyone to humilate them. They also would deny them water so they'd be lying there thirsty all day.

 
Israel would capture Palestinians and handcuff them to hospital beds. They would make them wear diapers and wouldn't change them for days, letting shit pile up. Then when they change them they would do it in front of everyone to humilate them. They also would deny them water so they'd be lying there thirsty all day.

Still love your jewish hero churchill, faggot?
 
I can cure you of your Nazism if you're willing to listen. You should drop the Hitler worship and read about Ronald Reagan.
"I can cure you of sanity and health, if you're willing to suck dick like me!" :soy: :soy: :soy:
 
Stupid faggot worships churchill - the greatest degenerate pederast to ever walk the Earth!
 
If you're a limpwristed normcuck, wtf are you doing here, faggotwhore?
 
It's a shithole because of Nazis like you.
Yessss good goyim. Stay eating your soy and corn syrup. Listen to the news and ignore the man behind the curtain. BE and ignorant worker ant
 
Yessss good goyim. Stay eating your soy and corn syrup. Listen to the news and ignore the man behind the curtain. BE and ignorant worker ant
Ah yes, be ignorant, don't read books, don't pay attention in school, don't read up about the holocaust, history is just for those nerds! You don't need to know anything about what the Nazis did, ignorance is bliss isn't it?
 
This is probably some incels fetish
 
Ah yes, be ignorant, don't read books, don't pay attention in school, don't read up about the holocaust, history is just for those nerds! You don't need to know anything about what the Nazis did, ignorance is bliss isn't it?
Oh no! The six gazillion kike babies that got eaten by bears and eagles! The horror!!!
 
Why aren't you permabanned yet, pederast?
 
I can cure you of your Nazism if you're willing to listen. You should drop the Hitler worship and read about Ronald Reagan.
Lmaooo you have to be jewish not to hate all these cuckservatives
 
Least of their crimes.
They are genociding 2 million people in broad daylight with bombs and starvation and nobody is allowed to say anything. If any other country was doing 1/10 of what they're doing they would be either invaded by now (if 3rd world country) or under serious international pressure. Only the Jewish colony has such immense media power to silence every voice.
 
What good have they done? Specifically
Reagan?

Lowered taxes

Brought about free trade Japan, Europe, Canada, and Mexico.

Deregulation

Pursued a monetary policy of low inflation, successfully bringing it down from over 10% to the standard 2%

Held down the rate of increase of government spending

Got rid of the "Fairness doctrine" which was a tool of censorship by the Left

Defeated the Soviet Union

Got hostages released
 
Least of their crimes.
They are genociding 2 million people in broad daylight with bombs and starvation and nobody is allowed to say anything.
That's not even really a crime. They're at war with them and even before this started, the vast majority of the Gazans are very poor and better off dead anyway. Israel is doing them a favor in many ways.
If any other country was doing 1/10 of what they're doing they would be either invaded by now (if 3rd world country) or under serious international pressure. Only the Jewish colony has such immense media power to silence every voice.
The E.U openly authorizes forcedfeeding prisoners. The E.U has zero right to take Israel to the Hague.
 
This guy is a gigafaggot. Seriously.
 
That's not even really a crime. They're at war with them and even before this started, the vast majority of the Gazans are very poor and better off dead anyway. Israel is doing them a favor in many ways.

The E.U openly authorizes forcedfeeding prisoners. The E.U has zero right to take Israel to the Hague.
Keep sucking daddy Trump's cuck moron.
 
Reagan?

Lowered taxes

Brought about free trade Japan, Europe, Canada, and Mexico.

Deregulation

Pursued a monetary policy of low inflation, successfully bringing it down from over 10% to the standard 2%

Held down the rate of increase of government spending

Got rid of the "Fairness doctrine" which was a tool of censorship by the Left

Defeated the Soviet Union

Got hostages released
So meaningless theatrics. You really believe a politician has say in how the country is ran over the people who hold the money and the institutions that brought someone like Raegan up. Either way we just can't agree fundamentally. Even if there was a uncorrupted, well meaning, all-powerful politician I would still hate him. They believe they are above us, and that they have the authority to decide our fates, send us to wars, put us away for life, and why? Because of made-up law's that they don't enforce on the people above them. They are straight up delusional schizophrenics that have convinced themselves that they have power over you, they are actors roleplaying senators, judges, office-holders. You seem to worship them, yet they are no more than you or I, they are just humans.
 
So meaningless theatrics. You really believe a politician has say in how the country is ran over the people who hold the money and the institutions that brought someone like Raegan up.
They can choose to implement the policy or not. Do you deny that it was under the Reagan Admin that a lot of these policies were pushed through Congress? When you run a campaign you need to appeal to voters, not moneyed interests, you need to satisfy voters or you won’t get re-elected and your party will suffer.
Either way we just can't agree fundamentally. Even if there was a uncorrupted, well meaning, all-powerful politician I would still hate him.
I don’t even care if they’re corrupt. Reagan was very corrupt but I still love him.
They believe they are above us, and that they have the authority to decide our fates, send us to wars, put us away for life, and why?
That’s why we elected Reagan and Trump, men who want to shrink the size of the government so it has less power over us.
Because of made-up law's that they don't enforce on the people above them. They are straight up delusional schizophrenics that have convinced themselves that they have power over you, they are actors roleplaying senators, judges, office-holders. You seem to worship them, yet they are no more than you or I, they are just humans.
They’re far more competent than us that’s why they’re in those positions
 
They can choose to implement the policy or not. Do you deny that it was under the Reagan Admin that a lot of these policies were pushed through Congress? When you run a campaign you need to appeal to voters, not moneyed interests, you need to satisfy voters or you won’t get re-elected and your party will suffer.
If you don't appeal to the money-holders you don't even get to run, simple as that. You get blacklisted, or even killed. Democracy itself is theatrics meant to give an illusion of choice as well as cause infighting, the difference between the 2 parties is minimal.
That’s why we elected Reagan and Trump, men who want to shrink the size of the government so it has less power over us.
What I'm saying is that what you perceive to be the government is irrelevant because the power-holders never change. Even IF Reagan and Trump had actual power, what kind of reasoning is that? "You don't like the government having too much power over you? Just vote for me, I will minimally downsize it, I still get to send armed platoons to your front steps to blow your face off or lock you in a cage for life if you anger me though."
They’re far more competent than us that’s why they’re in those positions
What makes them more competent and what positions exactly? The position of a master? A god? That's what they're roleplaying as. Why do you want to be ruled so badly, be free.
 
If you don't appeal to the money-holders you don't even get to run, simple as that. You get blacklisted, or even killed. Democracy itself is theatrics meant to give an illusion of choice as well as cause infighting, the difference between the 2 parties is minimal.
And if you don’t appeal to voters you won’t win the election. Democracy is an illusion then how come we always get what we want? If the same group controlled both parties, why are the parties total opposites on every issue and govern in completely different ways? Why do they benefit different people and harm different people if they’re both controlled by the same group? What you’re saying would make sense if the parties were similar, but they’re very different.
What I'm saying is that what you perceive to be the government is irrelevant because the power-holders never change. Even IF Reagan and Trump had actual power, what kind of reasoning is that? "You don't like the government having too much power over you? Just vote for me, I will minimally downsize it, I still get to send armed platoons to your front steps to blow your face off or lock you in a cage for life if you anger me though."
Because the government will be a lot less involved in your life under a conservative small government than under a giant liberal government. We will keep our own money, we will face far fewer regulations, and the economy would not be made up of this giant federal monster.
What makes them more competent and what positions exactly? The position of a master? A god? That's what they're roleplaying as. Why do you want to be ruled so badly, be free.
You’re the one who wants to be enslaved. Otherwise, he would support men like Reagan and Trump because they are the only ones who are trying to shrink the government that is pressing you. They’re the ones trying to liberate you. You can’t do it on your own, it’s impossible for you to lower taxes and to keep your own money, you need to help elect people like Reagan and Trump.
 
And if you don’t appeal to voters you won’t win the election. Democracy is an illusion then how come we always get what we want? If the same group controlled both parties, why are the parties total opposites on every issue and govern in completely different ways? Why do they benefit different people and harm different people if they’re both controlled by the same group? What you’re saying would make sense if the parties were similar, but they’re very different.

Because the government will be a lot less involved in your life under a conservative small government than under a giant liberal government. We will keep our own money, we will face far fewer regulations, and the economy would not be made up of this giant federal monster.

You’re the one who wants to be enslaved. Otherwise, he would support men like Reagan and Trump because they are the only ones who are trying to shrink the government that is pressing you. They’re the ones trying to liberate you. You can’t do it on your own, it’s impossible for you to lower taxes and to keep your own money, you need to help elect people like Reagan and Trump.
Downsize, fewer, shrink... Never abolish. You're still paying taxes, you're still obeying them like a dog, you're still at their mercy. Ignore laws, taxes, regulations, unless you think you'll get nailed. If you get caught and they try to imprison you, blow your brains out. An enslaved life is not worth living.
 
Downsize, fewer, shrink... Never abolish. You're still paying taxes, you're still obeying them like a dog, you're still at their mercy. Ignore laws, taxes, regulations, unless you think you'll get nailed. If you get caught and they try to imprison you, blow your brains out. An enslaved life is not worth living.
As King Arthur says, there are laws that make men slaves and there are laws that set them free. A lawless world with no government would be horrible. What we need is a strong but limited government
 
As King Arthur says, there are laws that make men slaves and there are laws that set them free. A lawless world with no government would be horrible. What we need is a strong but limited government
"What we need is to be run by kikes!" - some retarded faggot
 
As King Arthur says, there are laws that make men slaves and there are laws that set them free. A lawless world with no government would be horrible. What we need is a strong but limited government
The strong but limited government is your family, your tribe. Where there is an inherent hierarchy and you know the shot-callers have your interest at heart. I know it is idealistic, you are bound to get subdued and enslaved by larger factions like nations, but primitive tribes still exist. I believe them to be the perfect social structure for humans. Like I said it's wishful thinking and idealistic, as any of those tribes are at the mercy of large civilizations, but they do exist. They would lose any war, but they would fight that war for their own people, their own interests, not for strangers (Yes the people of your country are strangers, most of the people from your own city are strangers). They are not depressed, they are not anxious, they are not isolated, they do not work a 9-5, everyone in their environment is their kin. It is perfect. I would love to live like them even If it means ultimately getting wiped out by a warmonger.
 
We need a government retard.
Yeah, a jewish one. No way in hell must we let german revolutionaries be in charge.
Better to die than to speak german, no? Fucking Faggot.
 
Yeah, a jewish one. No way in hell must we let german revolutionaries be in charge.
Better to die than to speak german, no? Fucking Faggot.
death would be better than living under Nazi rule
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top