Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Is total remigration even possible? (stormfrontcels GTFIH)

AsiaCel

AsiaCel

shalom goyim
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Posts
30,127
Online time
16h 7m
I have no issues against remigration of Europe. After all, it is Europe and belongs to the Europeans. But the "remigration" shit is increasingly unrealistic as every day passes.

It is an interesting thought experiment; I think the remigration cost for Asia is much lower than in Europe, because we're not too muttified yet, but still prohibitvely expensive.

Let's use France as an example; I see it as a epiccenter and representative of the "crumbling state" in terms of racial purity.

Let's assume the goal of total remigration as being: The total removal of all non whites, including mongrels with 20% + mixture from France.

According to Wikipedia, France is 77% French nationality. I will pretend that France is 80% white, which is a generous number considering the hapas and temporary residents.

1760256304046


France has a population of 68,606,000.

That leaves us with 13,721,200 people to be removed.

Some questions:

Manpower and logistics

-How would you go about this and mobilize the state logistics, economics, and politics to achieve this goal?

-How many people would actually support the goal of mass genocide?

-How would you justify to your people of mobilizing resources to removing massed amount of foreigners?

-Will you have collaborators? Having collaborators
(even the Nazis had collaborators, and Jews served in them) would increase the realpoltik of your mission, and you will have to make consessions for them for their service.

-How would you mobilize the manpower to serve as deporters?
(I believe conscription will be required.)

Political and public support

-How would you radicalize the whites to support total remigration and not "Oh Tyrone's a good guy, he helps out in the farm and does not do crimes" exceptions that will inevitably happen?

-How would all this be hidden without affecting the mass media?
(In the era of internet, especially without a firewall like China or North Korea does, it is hard to hide a genocide especially in such scale.)

-How would you justify this to your people and the world?

Economy and Social support

-What would happen to Mongrels?

-What would happen to the properties owned by the foreigners/mongrels?

-How would you respond to the GDP and economics (quality of life in general) will inevitably take a hit.
(This operation will require a total war mobilization, will make Ukraine mobilization look like a joke)

-How would you respond to international sanctions, in terms of trade and even a military intervention, now the military is devoted to catching foreigners instead of fighting wars? What if NATO intervenes?
 
Last edited:
Yeah, this is what I mean. It’s easy to call for total ethnic death while in the comfort of your first world country until you realise that you would have to endure living in an african warlord/arab dictator type of shithole in order to do so

It’s doable if you mobilise the civilian population but it would cause riots, property destruction and burnings on a national scale. You would create a fourth world shithole anarchy in doing so
 
Last edited:
Remigration is unlikely. But if Europe gets into a big war (with Russia, for example) all immigrants will start leaving immediately. This happened in Ukraine when the war with Russia started.
 
I don't think it will happen that way. They will just enact policies that encourage gradual remigration:

1. No more gibs for people who cannot trace their European ancestry for more than 2 generations.

2. If your parents weren't born here, you'll have to leave if convicted of a crime.

Rules one and two are enough.

In any case, I am not a SFcel and none of this will happen. Far-right (read: centrist anti-immigration parties) would have zero traction if Western governments were a bit slower about replacement migration (see: Denmark).
 
gaschamber would be cheaper (in gmod)
 
I don't think it will happen that way. They will just enact policies that encourage gradual remigration:

1. No more gibs for people who cannot trace their European ancestry for more than 2 generations.

2. If your parents weren't born here, you'll have to leave if convicted of a crime.

Rules one and two are enough.

In any case, I am not a SFcel and none of this will happen. Far-right (read: centrist anti-immigration parties) would have zero traction if Western governments were a bit slower about replacement migration (see: Denmark).
Yeah you got to be gradual. These radical movements just cause unnecessary chaos
 
Yeah, this is what I mean. It’s easy to call for total ethnic death while in the comfort of your first world country until you realise that you would have to endure living in an african warlord/arab dictator type of shithole in order to do so

It’s doable if you mobilise the civilian population but it would cause riots, property destruction and burnings on a national scale. You would create a fourth world shithole anarchy in doing so
I have hopes for remigration in East Asia, especially the ones that aren't too infected yet. In fact, that is a big reason I'm obsessed with races. Every mutt or foreigner that gets citizenship is a step in the death spiral. Even in East Asia that hope is fainting.
 
I don't think it will happen that way. They will just enact policies that encourage gradual remigration:

1. No more gibs for people who cannot trace their European ancestry for more than 2 generations.

2. If your parents weren't born here, you'll have to leave if convicted of a crime.

Rules one and two are enough.

In any case, I am not a SFcel and none of this will happen. Far-right (read: centrist anti-immigration parties) would have zero traction if Western governments were a bit slower about replacement migration (see: Denmark).
Good idea, but what about mutts regarding the first point? Also, I think the idea will attract lots of Nazi accusations as "le ancestry finding"
 
According to Wikipedia, France is 77% French nationality. I will pretend that France is 80% white, which is a generous number considering the hapas and temporary residents.
The proportions will be a lot less favorable for the French when counting only military-age males.
 
Some sort of ending is to become inevitable when Europeans become more and more replaced with savage low IQ criminal retards who rape their family and get favoritism by the government. Maybe it will be a violent ending, I don't know. Deporting them is the kindest solution
 
Good idea, but what about mutts regarding the first point? Also, I think the idea will attract lots of Nazi accusations as "le ancestry finding"
Mixed race people are fine in my book. They are demographically insignificant.

Only the far-left will raise that problem. Center-left voters are not as crazy and could be convinced.
 
Last edited:
Rupert Lowe recently released a blueprint for how we could have mass remigration in the UK.
I think his plan predicted 3 million per parliamentary sitting
 
Last edited:
Some sort of ending is to become inevitable when Europeans become more and more replaced with savage low IQ criminal retards who rape their family and get favoritism by the government. Maybe it will be a violent ending, I don't know. Deporting them is the kindest solution
Rupert Lowe recently released a blueprint for how we could have mass remigration in the UK.
I think his plan predicted 3 million per parliamentary sitting
Closing the door to and deporting illegals is water af, the problem is remigrating non-whites as a whole
 
The logistics are the simplest part of the scheme just send them back on the boats they came with the issue is that remigration is a fringe far right autistic concept like the the Northwest Territorital Imperative that will never be realized. It's not supported by any major political parties/donors its biggest success is getting a couple thousand likes on twitter. It's more or less over
 
Realistically never, but theoretically it's very much possible if we use totalitarian measures of governing the country. If i was the dictator, Hitler would be considered as saint.
 
Realistically never, but theoretically it's very much possible if we use totalitarian measures of governing the country. If i was the dictator, Hitler would be considered as saint.
That reminded me of HOI4 tree bringing back imperial Russia. Many republics, in Russia, hypothetically would declare independence in the event of genocide against non Russians and militarily resist you; these minorities are disproportionally represented in the military so it is likely they have better training and experience than the average Russian manpower proper.

The Chechen war serves as a good example in real life of how difficult it could get.


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xSjSPQIZdQs
 
The suitcase or the coffin
 
The Chechen war serves as a good example in real life of how difficult it could get.
Corrupt and incompetent leadership and atomized nation is the reason, stalin was able to cuck chechlens, ingush and crimean tatars hard. If you would have totalitarian tools of control, national unity and competent leadership it's possible to do. Central asians were able to kick russians out.
 
The only way it could be done is through force. All laws are enforced by force anyway so nobody should have a problem with forcing immigrant shitters out of the country.
 
things will soon reach a breaking point and there will be a civil war
 
It will take time but it's definitely doable by far it will need totalitarianism tho
 
Realistically never, but theoretically it's very much possible if we use totalitarian measures of governing the country. If i was the dictator, Hitler would be considered as saint.
As he is a saint.
 
It will take time but it's definitely doable by far it will need totalitarianism tho
Totalitarianism is extremely unpopular with most on the right though. Good luck convincing ethnonationalist liberals and religious nuts to accept a totalitarian hyper bureaucratized state.
 
Totalitarianism is extremely unpopular with most on the right though. Good luck convincing ethnonationalist liberals and religious nuts to accept a totalitarian hyper bureaucratized state.
Totalitarianism is aids who wants that
 
Last edited:
Totalitarianism is aids who wants that
Nobody, and that’s the problem. People today feel entitled to everything because all they are used to are liberal democracies. At the moment, the only countries that are actively rising instead of declining are countries which value their national survival over individual needs. You can’t have both personal liberty and a nation that isn’t destined for destruction. It’s individualism vs collectivism.
 
Totalitarianism is extremely unpopular with most on the right though. Good luck convincing ethnonationalist liberals and religious nuts to accept a totalitarian hyper bureaucratized state.
I would accept it if it was ethnonationalist and religious. Or at the very least just didn't obstruct traditional religious beliefs and structures.
 
I have no issues against remigration of Europe. After all, it is Europe and belongs to the Europeans. But the "remigration" shit is increasingly unrealistic as every day passes.

It is an interesting thought experiment; I think the remigration cost for Asia is much lower than in Europe, because we're not too muttified yet, but still prohibitvely expensive.

Let's use France as an example; I see it as a epiccenter and representative of the "crumbling state" in terms of racial purity.

Let's assume the goal of total remigration as being: The total removal of all non whites, including mongrels with 20% + mixture from France.

According to Wikipedia, France is 77% French nationality. I will pretend that France is 80% white, which is a generous number considering the hapas and temporary residents.

View attachment 1571471

France has a population of 68,606,000.

That leaves us with 13,721,200 people to be removed.

Some questions:

Manpower and logistics

-How would you go about this and mobilize the state logistics, economics, and politics to achieve this goal?

-How many people would actually support the goal of mass genocide?

-How would you justify to your people of mobilizing resources to removing massed amount of foreigners?

-Will you have collaborators? Having collaborators
(even the Nazis had collaborators, and Jews served in them) would increase the realpoltik of your mission, and you will have to make consessions for them for their service.

-How would you mobilize the manpower to serve as deporters?
(I believe conscription will be required.)

Political and public support

-How would you radicalize the whites to support total remigration and not "Oh Tyrone's a good guy, he helps out in the farm and does not do crimes" exceptions that will inevitably happen?

-How would all this be hidden without affecting the mass media?
(In the era of internet, especially without a firewall like China or North Korea does, it is hard to hide a genocide especially in such scale.)

-How would you justify this to your people and the world?

Economy and Social support

-What would happen to Mongrels?

-What would happen to the properties owned by the foreigners/mongrels?

-How would you respond to the GDP and economics (quality of life in general) will inevitably take a hit.
(This operation will require a total war mobilization, will make Ukraine mobilization look like a joke)

-How would you respond to international sanctions, in terms of trade and even a military intervention, now the military is devoted to catching foreigners instead of fighting wars? What if NATO intervenes?
Dnr
All you have to do is move away from the cities to have how it was before,
But now you see how it is when socialism didnt invest into its own people
 
Maybe it was 500 years ago, but it sure as hell isn't now. The world is muttified now, and will only be increasingly muttified. Fighting it in this day and age is a fool's errand.
 
No one outside of incel forums or edgy larp spaces on X or insta thinks remigration will ever happen kek
 
I would accept it if it was ethnonationalist and religious. Or at the very least just didn't obstruct traditional religious beliefs and structures.
Maybe it was 500 years ago, but it sure as hell isn't now. The world is muttified now, and will only be increasingly muttified. Fighting it in this day and age is a fool's errand.
Europe is not worth saving.
Kavkaz destroys (mogs) all.


View: https://youtube.com/shorts/UISDYoygRxw?si=5A_xqXwlgomAUXUX
 
Remigration is unlikely. But if Europe gets into a big war (with Russia, for example) all immigrants will start leaving immediately. This happened in Ukraine when the war with Russia started.
those migrants with dual citizenship will move back to their 3rd world home countries as was seen with Israelis.
 
not if you break many human rights in doing so.
 
Nope it's over
 
Remigration is unlikely. But if Europe gets into a big war (with Russia, for example) all immigrants will start leaving immediately. This happened in Ukraine when the war with Russia started.
this aged well
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top