Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion is this kind of face enough for foids (in your opinion)?

packardD

packardD

mentally ill|nosepilled|heightpilled|2028
★★★★
Joined
Mar 25, 2024
Posts
2,867
Online time
16h 26m
Also what would you rate this guy ? (HTN / CHADLITE / CHAD facewise)

1780005109991

1780005209411

1780005241500
 
i was too lazy to go and find good quality photos , the lighting is bad the quality is bad
 
infraorbital recession of doom and despair
 
yes just ntmax and escape. Also shave your mustache lol
 
self glaze holy, bro looks like a chad
 
If he’s tell then yeah
 
Depends on height. If you’re like 5’6” with this face you’ll probably be nearcel, but avg height and up guys will be fine
 
Depends on height. If you’re like 5’6” with this face you’ll probably be nearcel, but avg height and up guys will be fine
i am not sure about his height / frame. he is streaming right now, looks 5'9 - 5'10 to me
 
I don't know about ratings, looks a bit above average, especially with those eye bags.
 
Ive seen way worse... this guy is atleast chadlite. If you disagree youre a brainwashed iqlet
never said he looks unappealing, but chadlite is a stretch, i'd say he's hhtn for sure disregarding status & physique ofc, im talking purely looks here
 
Looks like he should have no problems. Mid to high normie. His worst flaw imo is whatever the hell is happening under his eyes. But he has decent hair, eye shape, eyebrows, jaw. Facial hair is kinda whack imo but some girls will probably like it anyway.

I just thought of something stupid. We can't see his ears, covered by the headphones. We need more self-consciousness about ears. Can't rate this guy properly without knowing whether he's an earcel.
 
Horrible under-eye area and infras look like someone dropped a nuke there. Pretty solid otherwise tho, I'd say hmtn. Will obviously get foids, unless like 5'5 or less.
 
Can't really come to a final rating without seeing his side profile tho. For now, I'd say he's in hmtn-lhtn range.
 
HTN, he lacks angularity, and his miscellaneous features could be better.

Guys, stop fucking overrating.
Chad is 99.99th percentile. A Chad face wise, is Brad Pitt (on the lower end).
Chadlite is prime di caprio
DiCaprio was never chadlite, at prime he was perhaps hhtn. Pitt is also very overrated, I'd say he was MAYBE low chad in prime but for the most part, just high chadlite. The quintessential Chad is Henry Cavill, that's like the baseline for Chad. Anything below that is simply htn.
 
DiCaprio was never chadlite, at prime he was perhaps hhtn. Pitt is also very overrated, I'd say he was MAYBE low chad in prime but for the most part, just high chadlite. The quintessential Chad is Henry Cavill, that's like the baseline for Chad. Anything below that is simply htn.
According to the PSL rating scale, DiCaprio is still in the low 7 range. But let’s say he was HTN — how did he become an international and timeless sex symbol?


Real-life appeal > maths done by some autist.
 
But let’s say he was HTN — how did he become an international and timeless sex symbol?
Same way Timothee Chalamet became one despite being HTN. And fame has nothing to do with aesthetic beauty. Kpop fags are barely MTN and yet all young foids drool over them.

Real-life appeal > maths done by some autist.
You do realize PSL itself is nothing but math done by autists? And in any case, "real life appeal" is irrelevant in any discussion pertaining to ranking faces based on skeletal aesthetics. Sure other things like height and niche can affect one's sex appeal but PSL is limited to face alone.
 
Same way Timothee Chalamet became one despite being HTN. And fame has nothing to do with aesthetic beauty. Kpop fags are barely MTN and yet all young foids drool over them.
No, thimothee Chalamet never had the female appeal of dicaprio, that's pure marketing
You do realize PSL itself is nothing but math done by autists? And in any case, "real life appeal" is irrelevant in any discussion pertaining to ranking faces based on skeletal aesthetics. Sure other things like height and niche can affect one's sex appeal but PSL is limited to face alone.
PSL is largely pseudoscientific. The “harmony formula” itself was mostly created and popularized by the looksmaxxing community rather than established scientific literature.

It borrows concepts from legitimate fields such as facial symmetry, sexual dimorphism, averageness, and certain craniofacial traits that can influence perceived attractiveness. However, the actual PSL rating culture remains highly subjective and lacks standardized methodology, reproducibility, or strong empirical evidence.
 
ltn , is that you ? i imagine a POE player looking like that :feelskek: , not enough shave the mustache or try to grow a full beard . @packardD
 
Nice hair but yea not enough .
 
ltn , is that you ? i imagine a POE player looking like that :feelskek: , not enough shave the mustache or try to grow a full beard . @packardD
Mactics on YouTube. Why is everyone asking this stupid fking question. I wish I looked like that
 
No, thimothee Chalamet never had the female appeal of dicaprio, that's pure marketing
"Female appeal" is a meaningless term. DiCaprio is practically carried by eye area and pheno. Sure he mogs Chalamet but not by a huge margin.

PSL is largely pseudoscientific. The “harmony formula” itself was mostly created and popularized by the looksmaxxing community rather than established scientific literature.
Who gaf? PSL is meant to be a practical handbook to evaluate bone structure, and it strongly corresponds to (if not identical to) female preferences in males for short term mating.

It borrows concepts from legitimate fields such as facial symmetry, sexual dimorphism, averageness, and certain craniofacial traits that can influence perceived attractiveness. However, the actual PSL rating culture remains highly subjective and lacks standardized methodology, reproducibility, or strong empirical evidence.
Word salad
 
Yes it's enough for foids; as for the other question, I don't care about looksmax ratings.
 
"Female appeal" is a meaningless term.
The goal of the PSL scale is to measure a face in relation to female attraction.
Sure he mogs Chalamet but not by a huge margin.
fair
PSL is meant to be a practical handbook to evaluate bone structure, and it strongly corresponds to (if not identical to) female preferences in males for short term mating.
Says who ? There is no strong empirical and no scientific evidence of this.
Elias De Poot is often ranked higher than Alain Delon. Ask any woman on the street for her opinion; it will be very hard to find agreement.
Word salad
Search “PSL rating scale” on PubMed. You cannot present this system as an authority on the subject of physical attraction.
 
Last edited:
moga me to oblivion
 
he will get pussy and this is all that matters
 
The goal of the PSL scale is to measure a face in relation to female attraction.
No. The goal of PSL is to measure the skeletal structure of a face in relation to the ideal aesthetic benchmark. Which strongly corresponds to female attraction, but is not exactly identical.

Says who ? There is no strong empirical and no scientific evidence of this.
Elias De Poot is often ranked higher than Alain Delon. Ask any woman on the street for her opinion; it will be very hard to find agreement.
Niche and status. If De Poot and Delon were both co workers at an office instead of celebrities, foids at said office would gravitate towards the former.
 
This is just a some Normie dude
 

Similar threads

Clown_prince
Replies
19
Views
446
SubhumanOldcel
SubhumanOldcel
Rapistcel
Replies
35
Views
1K
Moth
Moth
My Name Jeff
Replies
19
Views
948
The Judge
The Judge
Exalted Monarch
Replies
10
Views
1K
no love found
N

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top