Is there anyway to retrieve lost posts from r/incels?

[Deleted member 195]

There were a few key threads I've been meaning to save but never got around to it and now they are all gone.

It's a shame, I've never been so enlightened before. Really wish it never got banned

 

[Minjaze]

Try the wayback machine.

http://archive.org/web/

 

[Zielony4]

Try the wayback machine.

http://archive.org/web/

Awesome, thanks! I didn't remember this.

 

[inuyoshi]

Trans incels

https://imgur.com/a/aVzlg

 

[Minjaze]

Awesome, thanks! I didn't remember this.

No problem! Glad to help.

 

[Deleted member 195]

Try the wayback machine.

http://archive.org/web/

Thanks so much

 

[blickpall]

There is also a person that does it as a service here:

https://incels.is/showthread.php?tid=1865

 

[StopCopingStartLDAR]

Awesome, thanks! I didn't remember this.

i went back to december of last year, it's sad seeing all those names ;(

 

[Zielony4]

i went back to december of last year, it's sad seeing all those names ;(

Damn that's true.

 

[a-virgin-nigger]

Awesome, thanks! I didn't remember this.

i went back to december of last year, it's sad seeing all those names ;(

Reminds me of when we had that little sub called r/IncelIdeas around that time too.

 

[Deleted member 1499]

Google caches.

 

[JovanD]

Trans incels

https://imgur.com/a/aVzlg

Interesting, it's common for trans ppl to live incel/LDAR lives prior to transitioning.

 

[Blackpill101]

Just found out that /r/incels actually had 40,000 members. Where are they now? How many are actually registered here?

 

[Minjaze]

Thanks so much

Anytime man!

 

[NekoStance]

Trans incels

https://imgur.com/a/aVzlg

If they're as goodlooking as they say they are they should be able to get lesbians

 

[Fontaine]

Just found out that /r/incels actually had 40,000 members. Where are they now? How many are actually registered here?

There were far fewer active members.

They are mostly here now. A few are on ForeverAlone, RealIncel, Currycel.

 

[Framecel222]

Trans incels

https://imgur.com/a/aVzlg

@knajjd

Do this and run lesbian game.

 

[blickpall]

Do this and run lesbian game.

@JovanD I know you seen this but you have my vote.

 

[inuyoshi]

If they're as goodlooking as they say they are they should be able to get lesbians

[font=arial, sans-serif]They are coping, they are not beautiful as they thought. I saw photos of some.
Taking hormones made them more insane and depressed[/font]

 

[asdf1234]

The feels reading some of the old posts

 

[PM_ME_STRIPPERS]

Just found out that /r/incels actually had 40,000 members. Where are they now? How many are actually registered here?

1700, it says on the bottom of the main page of this site, but most of these users are fakecels or normies infiltrating. Id have to say probably 500 give or take true incels are here.

 

[blickpall]

lesbians don't exist, besides it'd be ultra cucked to get on hormones just to get females lul

Why do lesbians have sex with women then, and get married to them? Curious to hear your thoughts on this.

 

[blickpall]

curiosity, showing how "empowered" or "unique" they are, etc. pretty much every lesbian has had sex with the opposite sex in the past, or even continue doing so while it's not the same way with the gays. why would someone have sex with the gender they're allegedly not attracted to?

Hm, I would say because of social/religious/political expectations? There are plenty of cases of men who marry women and have kids who come out as gay later in life. I imagine it's no different for women. They keep waiting for that thing to "click" as they move through the stages - thinking boys have cooties, having boys flirt with them, getting asked to a dance at the school, getting asked to become a boy's girlfriend, having sex as a rite of passage, etc. They keep waiting for it to feel normal/natural like it seems to for others, but it never does. Or maybe they want it to feel normal desperately, or they put on a front for their parents/religion/peers/etc. It's the question of at what point do they give up and realize that they just like women more and that it's okay in modern society. That's my take on it anyway.

 

[blickpall]

that's the biggest crock of shit i've heard in my life. not one of them gives a crap about social/religious/whatever expectations when it comes to whoring around and being gangbanged by dozens of men and proudly talk about it, but when it's having sex with another females they suddenly feel forced to not do it? lol. besides, it doesn't happen anywhere near that level with the gays so it's obvious that the heavy, HEAVY majority of "lesbians" are fake garbage

People care when they are in high school. It's normal in high school to be "whoring around and being gangbanged by dozens of men and proudly talk about it," (wasn't really my experience but maybe times have changed in 15 years), but it's not (or wasn't) normal to be talking about having sex with WOMEN and bragging about it. That is exactly what I'm talking about - that they did the things they were expected to do, because others were doing it. This is a common phenomenon in society.

If you have statistics to back up the "anywhere near the level with the gays" that you are talking about, that would be pertinent here. I think there are far more gay men out there than there are women, and I've heard of plenty of anecdotes of this happening with them. Doesn't blackpill teach us that if the gay man isn't Chad, he's unlikely to get laid even if he tried? What if he is a normie who doesn't even feel like trying, what are his chances then? Whereas Lesbian!Stacey supposedly can get dick regardless of attraction and is expected to (and can use a toy in the place of a dick and it's still part of lesbian sex). So no, I think your hyperbole is misguided.

 

[blickpall]

i dunno where you even live but no one that doesn't care about the former cares about the latter lol anywhere whoredom is glorified and seen as something to brag about, having sex with females will be seen as something to brag about as well

sure:

https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/2000/03/many-lesbians-have-had-sex-men-taking-full-sexual-history-important

https://contexts.org/files/2016/02/mF2.jpg

I see, good post here. By this definition, I think they are including bisexuals in their definition of lesbian, or at least the respondents are. It's still strange though, because according to research on the Kinsey scale, men are more likely to be bisexual than women. Might be an issue of self-classification, or cross-study false equivalency?