Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Is there any argument against REDISTRIBUTION OF FOIDS (marxism-rodgerism)?

Flagellum_Dei

Flagellum_Dei

Rαpe all cunnies
Joined
Mar 24, 2024
Posts
1,527
Is there any reason for the state to not give foid to every man?
Foid's relatives wouldn't be a problem since in marxism-rodgerism foids are taken to the government found camps just after the birth.
Foids fighting back wouldn't be a problem since they would've removed eyes, tongues and most of muscles, so they couldn't even punch.
The general population would be much happier, since the lies of foids couldn't be used against nonchads.
There would also be no inceldom.
With given foids just for them, many men would be constantly loyal to the state.
Cancer that foids are couldn't longer backstab the state with their hypergamy.
Central planing of childbirth would make demographics much better.

Are there any cons? Don't try to come with "human rights" that are "owed" to everybody. There's no such a thing as "being owed", if somebody say people are "owed" rights this would imply there's somebody to make them i.e. God. If I would refuse his existence, it would mean that all humans have natural liberty either for everything or for nothing. In second case I should consider every act, even such as breathing, as injustice, what makes this concept moronic. If I accept the first case, everything is allowed to man from nature. It means, that without a contract (agreement) with another man there could not be any injustice in their deeds against each other. Thus, without the social contract, which was broken, there are no tidings for liberties of nonchads, therefore, if the only right that punish nonchads is based on strenght and if I was to consider such strenght-based law a good thing, the inobedience towards the laws that banish their liberties is an even better thing, since they used the same strength-based right to overpower previous lawmaker. Thus foids being graped or killed isn't injustice, foids aren't owed life nor "autonomy".
 
Last edited:
I want them for myself and myself alone:feelsEhh::feelsthink:
 
I deserve a foid to fuck when i want it's only fair
 
We need eugenics added to this. Every Man can get a foid, but some need to be sterilized for the sake of stability.
 
We need eugenics added to this. Every Man can get a foid, but some need to be sterilized for the sake of stability.
Foids without wide hips are less likely to give a birth to a healthy child, thus they need to be sterilized.
 
Last edited:
Is there any reason for the state to not give foid to every man?
Foid's relatives wouldn't be a problem since in marxism-rodgerism foids are taken to the government found camps just after the birth.
Foids fighting back wouldn't be a problem since they would've removed eyes, tongues and most of muscles, so they couldn't even punch.
The general population would be much happier, since the lies of foids couldn't be used against nonchads.
There would also be no inceldom.
With given foids just for them, many men would be constantly loyal to the state.
Cancer that foids are couldn't longer backstab the state with their hypergamy.
Central planing of childbirth would make demographics much better.

Are there any cons? Don't try to come with "human rights" that are "owed" to everybody. There's no such a thing as "being owed", if somebody say people are "owed" rights this would imply there's somebody to make them i.e. God. If I would refuse his existence, it would mean that all humans have natural liberty either for everything or for nothing. In second case I should consider every act, even such as breathing, as injustice, what makes this concept moronic. If I accept the first case, everything is allowed to man from nature. It means, that without a contract (agreement) with another man there could not be any injustice in their deeds against each other. Thus, without the social contract, which was broken, there are no tidings for liberties of nonchads, therefore, if the only right that punish nonchads is based on strenght and if I was to consider such strenght-based law a good thing, the inobedience towards the laws that banish their liberties is an even better thing, since they used the same strength-based right to overpower previous lawmaker. Thus foids being graped or killed isn't injustice, foids aren't owed life nor "autonomy".
the only reason the US government decided to give FEMALE rights was to destroy the american family.

If the population truely is about 50/50 every man should have a woman counterpart.

With the freak lgbt and hatred of men going on, more and more women who would belong with a man are being taken away for unrighteous reasons.

If we could go back to father's marrying off their of age daughters, I think everything would be better.
 
the only reason the US government decided to give FEMALE rights was to destroy the american family.

If the population truely is about 50/50 every man should have a woman counterpart.

With the freak lgbt and hatred of men going on, more and more women who would belong with a man are being taken away for unrighteous reasons.

If we could go back to father's marrying off their of age daughters, I think everything would be better.
Nobody here is talking about your third world shithole, mutt. Also foids should be property of the state, not of the family. Only then redistribution can be well logistically and administratively organized and thus better.
 
The only counter-arguments I can think of stem from modern day feminism. So as of this moment, no.
 
The only counter-arguments I can think of stem from modern day feminism. So as of this moment, no.
These are appeal to emotions, foids are incapable of reasoning.

:foidSoy:that's teheesogyny, which is bad you silly inkwell! Because... IT JUST IS, OKAY?
 
I can think of two:

1.
It is a pointless and ridiculous fantasy, because it will never happen, because foids are people with agency like men are, and almost no society will accept reducing them the status of goods or property that can be "redistributed."
(The Handmaid's Tale is a rape fantasy for hard left anti-patriarchy radical feminists, not a documentary.)

2.
I don't want a woman who's forced to be with me by the power of the state, like a slave. I want to be wanted and loved.
 
Last edited:
It is a pointless and ridiculous fantasy, because it will never happen, because foids are people with agency like men are, and almost no society will accept reducing them the status of goods or property that can be "redistributed."
No, foids are inhuman animals without free will. Read https://incels.is/threads/considering-hypergamous-devils-as-humans-is-denial-of-blackpill.692664/

You say it's impossible to people to accept it, but you don't seem to consider Afghanistan as a proof it's possible to make it a normality. The only thing it differs is the way in which redistribution is made, in previous societies it was via foid's family, in marxism-rodgerism it would be via state.

2.
I don't want a woman who's forced to be with me by the power of the state, like a slave. I want to be wanted and loved.
It's impossible since you're a nonchad. System I described is the best substitute of it, maybe not necessary for you, but for most people it's enough to make them somehow grateful, and thus loyal for the state. Therefore it's the best system to exist.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Flagellum_Dei
Replies
6
Views
252
Flagellum_Dei
Flagellum_Dei
Based NaziCel
Replies
5
Views
177
Based NaziCel
Based NaziCel
Flagellum_Dei
Replies
6
Views
589
yeetbender.koala
yeetbender.koala
Devoteecel
Replies
59
Views
1K
Devoteecel
Devoteecel
Based NaziCel
Replies
41
Views
1K
AdamfromtheUK
AdamfromtheUK

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top