I don't believe "falling in love" exists or whatever it's supposed to mean. He wants to fuck kids but he either can't, or knows it's not worth the risk trying to do it and can control himself.
Yes, we're in agreement.
It seems you watched the video, or at least enough of it to hear the part where he says "it's not just physical attraction for me, I've actually met a child and then fallen in love with the child, and there's no way I can fulfill that."
The whole falling in love thing is mystification. Really it's that there's this physical sexual desire for pedophiles, the same that us ordinary straight guys feel for women. They simply have the urge to have sex with children where most men have it for women. Then all the talk of emotions or love comes after that, in that order. He's mystifying it by implying the emotional element/love/whatever comes
first, but that obviously doesn't make any sense. Because if he was a guy with a normal sexual orientation like we are, he'd just have the normal physical sexual attraction to adult women like we do. So under no sun does emphasizing emotional elements as the primary thing make sense.
And I'm glad you said this, because I'm someone who thinks a lot which is a double-edged sword because I can write good lengthy comments but I often overthink things and fail to point out basic truths, like this. I would've gotten there if I wrote about the video on my own but only after some analysis that would've likely given the "falling in love" thing too much credence before arriving there.
I don't think there's any difference between him and that 20-year old Chad most of us knew in high school was fucking the little 14-year old girl. Chad can just get away with it. He can do it and society will defend him, as has been proven with content posted here.
I agree with the point you are getting across here. You got to the heart of the hypocrisy with normies here. As you said, the whole pedophile panic thing is just a way to justify kicking disenfranchised men when they're already down, and morally justifying the miserable state they're already in, all while giving Chad and the worst women a free pass to suppress any acknowledgement of the hypocrisy.
Regarding communities like the "virtuous pedophile" website I just brought up, the logical conclusion of what you're saying only demonstrates that by going out of their way to diagnose/medicalize themselves as "pedophiles" they are only supporting the problem in the system/normie society saying "there is something wrong with them" when really the problem is simply that they aren't Chad. If they were Chad and the same in every other way, they wouldn't be "pedophiles." It's really that simple. Things come down to genetics/rote physical appearance more than retarded normies can ever admit. (the vast majority of normies aren't Chad, but exist to run cover for him and foids)
Obviously if Mr. hook hand in that interview video was better looking and living in the Philippines or Thailand, I don't think we'd be hearing about him being a miserable celibate "pedophile" and seeing all these psychiatrists and being a poster-child "virtuous pedophile," because he'd be satiating his desires every day JFL. (look up the French politician
Frédéric Mitterrand — it came out well into his political career he went to Thailand and fucked boy prostitutes for a while, and it was only a minor scandal in France, actually many
praised him for honesty...so it is a cultural thing, especially an Anglo and
American thing, because even in another Western country it isn't a hysteria/problem like it is here)
However, when being objective about actual pedophiles, which are a thing (that the normies you criticized can't properly differentiate) I emphasize pre pubescence and post pubescence because biology is the main factor in determining if someone is literally a pedophile, which I get isn't what you are talking about here, rather normies arbitrary obviously biased standards of who they deem "pedophiles." Because you brought up the example of a 14 year old. But surely an actual pedophile who is sexually attracted to a 7 year old is different.
Anyone would agree that a 20 year old is closer to a 30 year old than a 7 year old.
But a 14 year old is closer to a 20 year old than a 7 year old, right?
Therefore, a 14 year old is past the threshold for pedophilia.
Girls really begin puberty at about age 10. Let's be generous and define a pedophile as a man who actually only experiences sexual attraction to girls under the age of 10 years old. Having a thing for ones on the younger side, say 12, 13, or 14, I could grant as not being pedophilia as they'd be well into puberty, so it's really the low end of ephebophilia if anything. But there are really people with a condition where they can't help experience attraction to
very young prepubescent children, like wanting to fuck a 7 year old. It's not entirely clear why this is the case, and honestly, as long as society broadly is convinced that attraction to pubescent teenagers is anything comparable, I don't think it ever will be.
My grandmother married my grandfather when she was 14 years old, I shit you not. (my grandfather was in his 20's) My father is Iranian, (my mother is a white american, I'm half Iranian) this was in Iran in the 1940's. Needless to say, it was traditional marriage and they remained married until their deaths.
